Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersca2

10,000+ results

1.60s

  • Martin v. Campanaro

    156 F.2d 127 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 5, 1946

    We agree that the action of the National War Labor Board did not create rights, enforceable by the claimants, which will support their claims. 1 3. … Mediation Board, the hearings before the National War Labor Board, and the wartime no-strike pledge given by organized labor (of which we may take judicial notice), we think that a “reasonable man” would not believe that,

    Cited 59 timesPublished
  • Goetz v. Windsor Central School District

    698 F.2d 606 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 24, 1983

    See also White v. Mississippi State Oil and Gas Board, 650 F.2d 540, 542 (5th Cir. Unit A 1981); Beitzell v. … Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. at 572 , 92 S.Ct. at 2706 . Under the Constitution its meaning must be "broad indeed." Id.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Martin Fine v. Bellefonte Underwriters Insurance Co.

    758 F.2d 50 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 20, 1985

    Eutectic Corp. v. Metco Inc., 597 F.2d 32, 34 (2d Cir.1979); United States v. Fernandez, 506 F.2d 1200, 1202 (2d Cir.1974). See also Seese v. … See NLRB v. Brown & Root, Inc., 206 F.2d 73, 74 (8th Cir.1953). In the interest of finality of litigation, a panel will ordinarily recall its mandate only in exceptional circumstances.

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Hattem v. Schwarzenegger

    449 F.3d 423 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 23, 2006

    Comm'n v. … The first, Mackey v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Panama R. v. Johnson

    289 F. 964 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 15, 1923

    This was made very plain by Judge Addison Brown in The City of Alexandria (D. C.) 17 Fed. 390 . The same doctrine was applied in Quebec Steamship Co. v. Merchant, 133 U. S. 375, 378 , 10 Sup. Ct. 397, 399 ( 33 L. … In cases of an aggravated character, it may involve, also, an absolute forfeiture of his clothing and effects on board the ship.

    Cited 52 timesPublished
  • Defending Education v. Croton-Harmon Union Free School District

    Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 15, 2026

    24-1900 Defending Education v. … Board Trustees of Croton-Harmon Board of Education, Defendants-Appellees. ∗ ∗ The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to amend the official caption as set forth above

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Schweizer Aircraft Corporation v. Local 1752, International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America

    29 F.3d 83 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 11, 1994

    Implement Workers v. … Significantly, other provisions of the Plan also gave Schweizer's Board of Directors unlimited power over the Plan.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Edward Vega v. Floyd H. Miller, James C. Desimone, Howard L. English, Carolyn D. Jones, and G. Peter Cooney

    273 F.3d 460 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 29, 2001

    Board of Regents, 385 U.S. 589 , 87 S.Ct. 675 , 17 L.Ed.2d 629 (1967), and Dube v. … See Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 573 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). The charges must be made “public” by the government employer, Brandt v.

    Cited 38 timesPublished
  • Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., and Subsidiaries v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

    386 F.3d 464 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 28, 2004

    See Zenz v. … Comm’r, 72 T.C. 751 , 1979 WL 3746 (1979), aff'd, 647 F.2d 169 (9th Cir.1981); Paparo v. Comm’r, 71 T.C. 692 , 1979 WL 3754 (1979); Benjamin v.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • MacIo Ennis v. E. Lefevre, Superintendent, Clinton Correctional Facility, Respondent

    560 F.2d 1072 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 9, 1977

    Brown v. Warden, 417 F.Supp. 970, 973 (N.D.Ill.1976). … Brown v.

    Cited 33 timesPublished
  • Powell v. Maldonado

    Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 2, 2026

    25-259-cv Powell v. … See id.; Windward Bora LLC v. Browne, 110 F.4th 120, 129 (2d Cir. 2024).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Shattuck v. Helvering

    119 F.2d 902 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 5, 1941

    Int.Rev.Acts, page 707, means the same as “acquired and held” (McFeely v. … Helvering v. San Joaquin Co., 297 U.S. 496 , 56 S.Ct. 569 , 80 L.Ed. 824 . Yet that is a stronger case, since it might be argued that the optionee “holds” what he has in his power to “acquire.” Cf. Sommers v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Carter v. Incorporated Village of Ocean Beach

    Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 21, 2014

    13‐815‐cv Carter v.  … Lore v. 

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Anna Mahramas v. American Export Isbrandtsen Lines, Inc., and House of Albert, Inc.

    475 F.2d 165 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 22, 1973

    ’s] legitimate interests,” Kermarec v. … Mahramas, was a seaman entitled to the benefits of the Jones Act and maintenance and cure because she was engaged in employment on board a ship.

    Cited 74 timesPublished
  • De La Rosa v. Holder

    598 F.3d 103 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 25, 2010

    09-3099-ag De La Rosa v. … See Xian Tuan Ye v. Dep’t of Homeland Sec., 446 F.3d 289 (2d Cir. 2006). “The Board will not engage in de novo review of findings of fact determined by an immigration judge.

    Cited 76 timesPublished
  • Scott A. Taber v. Robert S. Maine, and United States of America

    45 F.3d 598 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 5, 1995

    Roberto v. … Brown, 348 U.S. at 112 , 75 S.Ct. at 143 .

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Rhodes-Bradford v. Keisler

    507 F.3d 77 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 7, 2007

    of the period in which the alien is permitted to seek review of such order by the Board of Immigration Appeals.” 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (a)(47)(B). … Ashton v. Gonzales, 431 F.3d 95, 97 (2d Cir.2005).

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Main Street Legal Services., Inc. v. National Security Council

    811 F.3d 542 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 26, 2016

    The Board for Low Intensity Conflict In 1986, Congress amended the National Security Act to provide for the President’s “establish[ment]” within the NSC System of “a board to be known as the ‘Board for Low Intensity Conflict … It is not clear that the statutory board or committees presently exist.

    Cited 69 timesPublished
  • Anthony Canizzo, and Cross-Appellant v. Farrell Lines, Inc., and Cross-Appellee, and Universal Terminal and Stevedoring Corp., and Third Party Farrell Lines, Inc., Third Party v. Frank J. Holleran, Inc., Third Party

    579 F.2d 682 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 2, 1978

    See 29 C.F.R. §§ 1918.2 (a); 1918.3(c); Brown v. Mitsubishi Shintaku Ginko, 550 F.2d 331, 333 (5 Cir. 1977). … In Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Carte Blanche (Singapore) Pte., Ltd. v. Diners Club International, Inc.

    2 F.3d 24 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 19, 1993

    (emphasis in original); Gartner v. … Kirno Hill Corp. v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.