Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersca2

10,000+ results

1.01s

  • Freda v. Lavine

    494 F.2d 107 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 29, 1974

    See Zwickler v. Koota, supra, 389 U.S. at 244 n. 4, 88 S.Ct. 391 (1967); Reid v. Board of Education, supra, 453 F.2d at 244. 1 The regulation reads in pertinent part: '352.31 Estimate of need and application of income. … See Reid v. Board of Education, 453 F.2d 238 , 241 (2d Cir. 1971); Note, Federal-Question Abstention: Justice Frankfurter's Doctrine in an Activist Era, 80 Harv.L.Rev. 604, 606 (1967). But cases like Reetz v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Kamagate v. Ashcroft

    385 F.3d 144 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 21, 2004

    See Kuhali v. Reno, 266 F.3d at 99 (citing INS v. St. … See, e.g., Brown v. Ashcroft, 360 F.3d 346, 353 (2d Cir.2004). C.

    Cited 37 timesPublished
  • Ernst v. Carrigan

    814 F.3d 116 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 22, 2016

    On April 11, 2011, an anonymous nine-page letter was sent to numerous Addison residents, including all members of the Selectboard, school board, planning board, and development review board, as well as local newspapers. … For example, the Ninth Circuit, in Batzel v.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • In Re Ettinger

    76 F.2d 741 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 1, 1935

    Mason v. Dean, 31 F.(2d) 945 (C. C. A. 9). … Ramsey v. Home Mortg. Co. (D. C.) 47 F.(2d) 621 ; Smith v. Brown, 3 F.(2d) 926 (C. C. A. 5).

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • United States v. Diaz

    577 F.2d 821 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 27, 1978

    In Curci’s subsequent applications, the Board found no new evidence of error and rejected them. … E. g., United States v.

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • The Pendragon Castle

    5 F.2d 56 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 15, 1924

    The latter vessel had started with 6,154 tons on board. Her pumps being clogged, the water did rise high enough to completely spoil 199 tons. … As Holmes, J., remarked in Oelwerke v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Stanbury v. Mukasey

    271 F. App'x 14 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 20, 2008

    Ming Xia Chen v. BIA, 435 F.3d 141, 144 (2d Cir.2006). … Kambolli v. Gonzales, 449 F.3d 454, 464-65 (2d Cir.2006) (per curiam).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Pirozzi v. The City Of New York

    117 F.3d 722 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 30, 1997

    117 F.3d 722 John PIROZZI, Frank Rotundi, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. … Pirozzi v. City of New York, 950 F.Supp. 90 (S.D.N.Y.1996).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Xia Fan Huang v. Holder

    591 F.3d 124 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 12, 2010

    PER CURIAM: This case calls upon us in principal part to determine whether the opinion of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) in In re M-F-W & L-G, 24 I. & N. … Thus, she was, under the Board’s own use of a standard English definition, sterilized. Pet’r Br. 22.

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • United States v. Zvonko Busic

    549 F.2d 252 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 27, 1977

    See Travis v. United States, 364 U.S. 631 , 81 S.Ct. 358 , 5 L.Ed.2d 340 (1961) (non-Communist affidavit “on file” in Washington, D.C.); United States v. … S. v. Stallworth, 543 F.2d 1038 (2d Cir. 1976).

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Crosland v. Safir

    54 F. App'x 504 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 20, 2002

    See Ormiston v. Nelson, 117 F.3d 69, 71 (2d Cir.1997). … Accordingly, he argues that, under our “continuing violation doctrine,” see Weeks v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters

    19 F.3d 816 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 24, 1994

    . § 1964 , against the IBT, its General Executive Board (Board), the eighteen members of the Board, the Commission of La Cosa Nostra (LCN) and individual members and associates of LCN. See United States v. … In 1989, the government’s claims against the IBT, the Board, and the Board members were settled by means of a Consent Decree, which instituted a wholesale reform of the IBT’s electoral and disciplinary processes.

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • Carroll v. United States

    133 F.2d 690 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 9, 1943

    Blamberg Bros. v. … . -, the same reasoning would have led also to the dismissal of the libel as against the Waterman Steamship Agency, for United States Shipping Board Merchant Fleet Corporation v.

    Cited 57 timesPublished
  • Qun Yang v. Edward J.. Mcelroy

    277 F.3d 158 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 7, 2002

    Some courts have strictly adhered to the record before the Board. E.g., Sivaainkaran v. … Cordero-Trejo v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Serra v. United States General Services Administration

    847 F.2d 1045 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 27, 1988

    Relying on Board of Education v. Pico, supra, Serra contends that he is entitled to a trial to determine whether in fact the removal was impermissibly content-based. … Pico v. Board of Education, 638 F.2d 404 (2d Cir.1980), aff'd, 457 U.S. 853 , 102 S.Ct. 2799 , 73 L.Ed.2d 435 (1982). But he has not done so.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Rumsey Mfg. Corp. v. United States Hoffman MacHinery Corp.

    187 F.2d 927 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 29, 1951

    Section 13(c) sets out the procedure both before the Appeal Board or a court. … United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp., 2 Cir., 291 F. 23, 28 ; Todd Dry Dock, etc., Corp. v. Sumner Iron Works, 9 Cir., 289 F. 217, 220 . 7 . 273 U.S. 227 , 47 S.Ct. 409 , 71 L.Ed. 621 . 8 .

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Powell v. Maldonado

    Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 2, 2026

    25-259-cv Powell v. … See id.; Windward Bora LLC v. Browne, 110 F.4th 120, 129 (2d Cir. 2024).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Rajinder Singh Sachdev v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

    788 F.2d 912 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 22, 1986

    We give great deference to the Board’s reasonable interpretation of the notice requirements of section 205, particularly in view of the absence of contrary authority. See INS v. … For support, petitioner cites our holding in Corniel-Rodriguez v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Prince Line, Ltd. v. American Paper Exports, Inc.

    55 F.2d 1053 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 8, 1932

    Pressprich v. Elwell & Co., 250 F. 939 (C. C. A. 2); Owens v. Breitung, 270 F. 190, 193 , (C. C. A. 2); Cory Bros. v. U. S., 51 F.(2d) 1010 , (C. C. A. 2). The warrant for this doctrine was discussed in U. S. ex rel. … Bank of Columbia v. Okely, 4 Wheat. 235 , 4 L. Ed. 559 ; U. S. v. National City Bank, 281 P. 754 , 757 (C. C. A. 2); Maytag v. Meadows Mfg. Co., 45 F.(2d) 299 , (C. C. A. 7).

    Cited 31 timesPublished
  • Carter v. Incorporated Village of Ocean Beach

    Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 21, 2014

    13‐815‐cv Carter v.  … Lore v. 

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.