Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.48s
591 F.3d 72 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 7, 2010
States v. Brown, 352 F.3d 654, 663 (2d Cir. 2003). However, the Supreme Court observed in Johnson v. … v.
Cited 12 timesPublished778 F.2d 925 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 3, 1985
See, e.g., United States v. Gottlieb, 493 F.2d 987, 994 (2d Cir.1974); United States v. Brown, 456 F.2d 293, 295 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 407 U.S. 910 , 92 S.Ct. 2436 , 32 L.Ed.2d 684 (1972). … See United States v. Mohabir, 624 F.2d 1140, 1146 (2d Cir.1980); see also United States v.
Cited 37 timesPublished902 F.2d 204 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 1, 1990
See Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). See also Lopez v. Henry Phipps Plaza South, Inc., 498 F.2d 937 (2d Cir.1974) (Friendly, J.) … See Davis v. Starr, 88 Misc.2d 210 , 387 N.Y.S.2d 351 (App.Div.1976); cf. Liotta v.
Cited 22 timesPublishedGraselli Chemical Co. v. Ætna Explosives Co.
252 F. 456 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 24, 1918
The existing board disputed Ihe power of the stockholders to hold the election. … In Hayes v. Pierson, 65 N. J.
Cited 29 timesPublished712 F. App'x 78 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 23, 2018
17-1086 Paul v. … (emphasis added)); Walczyk v.
Cited 2 timesUnpublishedNew London Northern R. v. Smith
141 F.2d 219 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 2, 1944
It, however, was strictly limited in Edwards v. Chile Copper Co., 270 U.S. 452 , 46 S.Ct. 345 , 70 L.Ed. 678 ; Magruder v. Washington, B. & A. Realty Corp., 316 U. … S. 69 , 62 S.Ct. 922 , 86 L.Ed. 1278 , and in our own decision in Argonaut Consolidated Mining Co. v. Anderson, 2 Cir., 52 F.2d 55, 56 . Compare also Von Baumbach v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedSecurities And Exchange Commission v. Fifth Avenue Coach Lines, Inc.
435 F.2d 510 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 8, 1970
Herpich v. Wallace, 430 F.2d 792 (5th Cir. 1970); Shell & Love v. Hensley, 430 F.2d 819 (5th Cir. 1970); Schoenbaum v. … Bankers Security Corp. v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedSuresh v. U.S. Dept. of Justice
204 F. App'x 935 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 8, 2006
See Kaur v. BIA, 413 F.3d 232, 233 (2d Cir.2005) (per curiam); Jin Ming Liu v. Gonzales, 439 F.3d 109, 111 (2d Cir. 2006). … Kaur v. BIA, 413 F.3d 232, 233-34 (2d Cir.2005); Ke Zhen Zhao v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice, 265 F.3d 83 , 93 (2d Cir.2001) (internal citations omitted).
Cited 1 timesPublishedIsrael v. Luckenbach S. S. Co.
6 F.2d 996 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 9, 1925
Efforts were made by the appellant to complete the transportation of the balance of the coffee contracted for by appealing to the Shipping Board, and this failed. … Texas Co. v. Hogarth Shipping, 256 U. S. 619 , 41 S. Ct. 612 , 65 L. Ed. 1123 ; Quina Export Co. v. Seebold (C. C. A.) 287 F. 626 ; Allanwilde Corporation v. Vacuum Oil Co., 248 U. S. 377 , 39 S. Ct. 147 , 63 L.
Cited 5 timesPublished128 F.4th 433 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 13, 2025
22-1377-cv Hoffer v. … MITCHELL HENDY, Mayer Brown LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff–Appellant. BRIAN D.
Cited 26 timesPublishedAhmad v. United States Immigration & Naturalization Service
39 F. App'x 681 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 16, 2002
SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED the judgment of the Board of Immigration Appeals be AFFIRMED. … INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 322 , 112 S.Ct. 719 , 116 L.Ed.2d 823 (1992).
Cited 1 timesPublished90 F.2d 622 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 14, 1937
The Board thought that the income was not “strictly compensation derived from the State or for services performed for the State” and affirmed the ruling. … It was repudiated in Bettman v. Warwick, 108 F. 46 (C.C.A.6), and-we refused to base our decision upon it in McLoughlin v. Commissioner, 89 F.(2d) 699 .
Cited 5 timesPublished76 F.2d 741 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 1, 1935
Mason v. Dean, 31 F.(2d) 945 (C. C. A. 9). … Ramsey v. Home Mortg. Co. (D. C.) 47 F.(2d) 621 ; Smith v. Brown, 3 F.(2d) 926 (C. C. A. 5).
Cited 19 timesPublished638 F. App'x 108 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 18, 2016
13-3881 Lin v. … FOR PETITIONER: Michael Brown, Law Office of Michael A.O. Brown, New York, New York. FOR RESPONDENT: Stuart F.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedSamuel M. Rizzitelli v. Federal Labor Relations Authority
212 F.3d 710 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 17, 2000
See Turgeon v. … Contractors Ass'n v. Ordman, 366 F.2d 776, 776 (2d Cir.1966) (per curiam); see also Vaca v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedAirline Pilots Ass'n v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.
765 F.2d 377 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 21, 1985
See Air Cargo, Inc. v. … Airline Pilots Association, International v. Pan American World. Airways, Inc., consolidated with the appeal of FEIA v.
Cited 4 timesPublished140 F.2d 592 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 31, 1944
Such as were merely reports of accountants addressed to the board, the board was charged with the duty of examining; such as were disseminated among the shareholders, the board presumably authorized to be sent out. … Judgment affirmed. * Foster v. United States, 6 Cir., 178 F. 165, 175, 176 ; Smith v. Moore, 9 Cir., 199 F. 689, 697 ; Cullen v. United States, 9 Cir., 2 F.2d 524 ; Arnold v.
Cited 86 timesPublishedBakelite Corporation v. National Aniline & Chem. Co.
83 F.2d 176 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 13, 1936
This statute was construed in Greenough v. … Rea v. Keller, 215 Ala. 672 , 112 So. 211, 212 ; Citizens’ Trust & Savings Bank of South Bend v.
Cited 17 timesPublished284 F.2d 317 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 21, 1960
See Merrill v. Beaute Vues Corporation, 10 Cir., 235 F.2d 893 . … United States v. Lefkowitz et al., 2 Cir., 284 F.2d 310, 316 .
Cited 4 timesPublishedYan Fang Wang v. United States Department of Justice
161 F. App'x 130 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 30, 2005
SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION of this petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decision, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the petition for review is DENIED. … See Arango-Aradondo v. INS, 13 F.3d 610, 613 (2d Cir.1994). We review factual findings under the substantial evidence standard. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (b)(4)(B); Zhou Yun Zhang v. INS, 386 F.3d 66, 73 (2d Cir.2004).
Cited 2 timesPublished
Ask Donna