Case law

United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America

120 F.3d 341 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 11, 1997

The district court affirmed a decision of the Independent Review Board (“IRB”), an investigative and disciplinary body established under the consent decree entered in United States v. … See United States v.

Anastasios Katris A/K/A Stash Katres v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

562 F.2d 866 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 7, 1977

. § 1105a(a), of a final order of deportation entered by the Board of Immigration Appeals on January 28, 1977. … See La Franca v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 413 F.2d 686, 689 (2d Cir. 1969); Vlissidis v. Anadell, 262 F.2d 398, 400 (7th Cir. 1959); Medeiros v.

Gillette v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

76 F.2d 6 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 4, 1935

The Board of Tax Appeals affirmed the Commissioner. … The order of the Board of Tax Appeals is affirmed.

Guardians Ass'n of New York City Police Department, Inc. v. Civil Service Commission of New York

633 F.2d 232 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 25, 1980

Compare Brown v. … Board of Examiners, 458 F.2d 1167 (2d Cir. 1972). In Kirkland v.

Cassidy v. Horan

405 F.2d 230 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 30, 1968

Coleman v. Brotherhood of Ry. & Steamship Clerks, etc., 340 F.2d 206 , 208, 15 A.L.R.3d 933 (2d Cir. 1965); see Horner v. … This claim, however, would seem to be one to be made, if at all, to the local union, through its governing board and members; see Highway Truck Drivers, etc. v. Cohen, 284 F.2d 162 , 164 (3d Cir. 1960); Holdeman v.

Clarke v. Town of Northampton

120 F. 661 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 8, 1903

Parkersburg v. Brown, 106 U. S. 487 , 1 Sup. Ct. 442, 27 L. Ed. 238 ; Cowdrey v. Town of Caneadea (C. C.) 16 Fed. 532 . … Katzenberger v. Aberdeen, 121 U. S. 172, 178 , 7 Sup. Ct. 947, 950, 30 L. Ed. 911 .

Misek-Falkoff v. McDonald

63 F. App'x 551 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 24, 2003

It reads as follows: In Misek-Falkoff v. … See Misek-Falkoff v. American Lawyer Media, Inc., 300 A.D.2d 215 , 752 N.Y.S.2d 647 (1st Dep’t 2002).

Sniado, III v. Bank Austria Ag

378 F.3d 210 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 5, 2004

Hoffman-La Roche Ltd. v. Empagran S.A., ___ U.S. ___, 124 S.Ct. 2359 , 159 L.Ed.2d 226 (2004) (" Empagran "). See Bank Austria v. … See Sniado v.

Bates v. Long Island Railroad

997 F.2d 1028 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 2, 1993

A Public Law Board ultimately affirmed Salva’s termination. … As the Supreme Court noted in School Board v.

Carte Blanche (Singapore) Pte., Ltd. v. Diners Club International, Inc.

2 F.3d 24 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 19, 1993

(emphasis in original); Gartner v. … Kirno Hill Corp. v.

Tebo Yacht Basin Co. v. United States

26 F.2d 964 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 18, 1928

Weston v. Penniman, Fed. Cas., No. 17,455. … Appellant refers to The Steel Inventor v. Woolsey (C. C. A.) 24 F.(2d) 657 , 1928 A. M. C. 513, and U. S. v. Thekla, 266 U. S. 328 , 45 S. Ct. 112 , 69 L.

Gay v. Carlson

60 F.3d 83 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 12, 1995

Co. v. Buell, 480 U.S. 557, 562 , 107 S.Ct. 1410, 1414 , 94 L.Ed.2d 563 (1987). These Boards are composed of members selected by the air carriers and by labor organizations representing their employees. 45 U.S.C. … See Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. v.

United States Ex Rel. Frank Orlando, Relator-Appellant v. District Director of Immigration and Naturalization

222 F.2d 537 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 2, 1955

In Ohio Bell Telephone Company v. … his final classification, Bradley v.

S. E. C. Corporation, Formerly Known as Canaday Cooler Co., Inc. v. United States

241 F.2d 416 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 25, 1957

CORPORATION, formerly known as Canaday Cooler Co., Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee. No. 228. Docket 24175. United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit. … , of Satterlee, Browne & Cherbonnier, New York City (Irving Levine, New York City, on the brief), for plaintiff-appellant. 3 Miriam R.

In the Matter of Instruments for Industry, Inc., Debtor-Appellee v. United States

496 F.2d 1157 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 28, 1974

United States v. Seckinger, 397 U.S. 203, 210 , 90 S.Ct. 880, 884 , 25 L.Ed.2d 224 (1970). … Sturm v. United States, 421 F.2d 723, 727 , 190 Ct.Cl. 691, 697 (1970). There can be no doubt that the interpretation favoring the contractor is “reasonable and practical.” See United States v.

United States v. James

239 F.3d 120 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 22, 2000

United States v. Khan, 53 F.3d 507, 514 (2d Cir.1995). … See United States v. Tipton, 90 F.3d 861 (4th Cir.1996). . Gordon v.

Plummer v. Chemical Bank

668 F.2d 654 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 5, 1982

The district judge also had to satisfy himself that the named plaintiffs were adequate representatives of the entire class in this across-the-board type of settlement. East Texas Motor Freight System, Inc. v. … See, e.g., Armstrong v. Board of School Directors, supra, 616 F.2d at 314-15; Boyd v. Bechtel Corp., 485 F.Supp. 610, 617 (N.D.Cal.1979); Women’s Committee for Equal Employment Opportunity v.

Minkoff v. Scranton Frocks, Inc.

279 F.2d 115 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 8, 1960

Shattuck v. Helvering

119 F.2d 902 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 5, 1941

Int.Rev.Acts, page 707, means the same as “acquired and held” (McFeely v. … Helvering v. San Joaquin Co., 297 U.S. 496 , 56 S.Ct. 569 , 80 L.Ed. 824 . Yet that is a stronger case, since it might be argued that the optionee “holds” what he has in his power to “acquire.” Cf. Sommers v.

United States v. Ivo Martinez-Gonzalez, and Aurora Sanchez-Sanchez, Appellee-Defendants

686 F.2d 93 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 30, 1982

See Taylor v. Alabama, - U.S. -, -, 102 S.Ct. 2664, 2667 , 73 L.Ed.2d 314 (1982); Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. at 603-04 , 95 S.Ct. at 2261-2262 (and eases cited therein). … See, e.g., Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. at 605 , 95 S.Ct. at 2262 ; Taylor v. Alabama, -U.S. at -, 102 S.Ct. at 2669 .