Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
5.30s
Yi Shun Jiang v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
148 F. App'x 42 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 7, 2005
Secaida-Rosales v. INS, 331 F.3d 297, 307 (2d Cir.2003) (quoting Diallo v. INS, 232 F.3d 279, 287 (2d Cir.2000)). … Shi v. BIA 374 F.3d 64, 66 (2d Cir.2004) (per curiam). For the foregoing reasons, the petition for review of the order of the Board of Immigration Appeals is hereby DENIED.
Cited 1 timesPublished284 F. App'x 837 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 8, 2008
United States v. Brown, 352 F.3d 654, 660 (2d Cir.2003) (citing Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 97-98 , 106 S.Ct. 1712 , 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986)). … Snyder v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedQi Hang Guo v. U.S. Dept. Of Justice, Attorney General Gonzales
422 F.3d 61 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 7, 2005
“The order of the immigration judge, then, is not final when a timely appeal is taken to the Board.” Castillo-Rodriguez v. Immigration & Naturalization Serv., 929 F.2d 181, 183 (5th Cir.1991). … See Twum v.
Cited 8 timesPublished104 F. 219 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 25, 1900
McKnight v. Dunlop, 5 N. Y. 537 ; Sprague v. Blake, 20 Wend. 63 . … In Hallenbeck v.
Cited 5 timesPublished791 F.2d 255 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 23, 1986
See Board of Education v. Califano, 584 F.2d 576 , 584 n. 29 (2d Cir.1978). Moreover, modern statistical approaches have been employed by other courts in jury selection cases. … Young, Constitutional Law 602 (2d ed. 1983); see Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443 , 73 S.Ct. 397 , 97 L.Ed. 469 (1953).
Cited 1 timesPublishedS. E. C. Corporation, Formerly Known as Canaday Cooler Co., Inc. v. United States
241 F.2d 416 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 25, 1957
CORPORATION, formerly known as Canaday Cooler Co., Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee. No. 228. Docket 24175. United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit. … , of Satterlee, Browne & Cherbonnier, New York City (Irving Levine, New York City, on the brief), for plaintiff-appellant. 3 Miriam R.
Cited 0 timesPublishedLin Zhong v. United States Department of Justice, Attorney General Gonzales
480 F.3d 104 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 17, 2007
. § 1105a(c), a court lacks jurisdiction to consider a claim which has not first been presented to the Board ....”); Ravindran v. … INS, 976 F.2d 754, 761 (1st Cir.1992) (“Issues not raised before the Board may not be raised for the first time upon judicial review of the Board’s decisions.... [This] requirement is jurisdictional.”); Rivera-Zurita v.
Abrogated on other grounds by Santos-Zacaria v. Garland, 598 U.S. 411 (2023)Cited 1,135 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Appeals
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 8, 2023
Schad v. Borough of Mount Ephraim, 452 U.S. 61, 68 (1981). In this vein, a number of courts have noted that “despite the temptation it is not the province of a federal court to act as a super-zoning board.” … Carter v.
Cited 0 timesPublished147 F. 199 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 7, 1906
The Board of General Appraisers decided; and the court below affirmed that decision, that the importations should have been classified for duty under paragraph 699, of the present tariff act (Act July 24, 1897, c. 11, § 2 … It is sufficient to refer to the decision of this court in Hiller v. United States, 106 Fed. 73 , 45 C. C. A. 229 . But rossed pulp wood is not a manufactured timber in anytime sense.
Cited 12 timesPublished668 F.2d 654 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 5, 1982
The district judge also had to satisfy himself that the named plaintiffs were adequate representatives of the entire class in this across-the-board type of settlement. East Texas Motor Freight System, Inc. v. … See, e.g., Armstrong v. Board of School Directors, supra, 616 F.2d at 314-15; Boyd v. Bechtel Corp., 485 F.Supp. 610, 617 (N.D.Cal.1979); Women’s Committee for Equal Employment Opportunity v.
Cited 108 timesPublishedCommissioner of Internal Revenue v. Smith
136 F.2d 556 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 9, 1943
In Brown v. … In view of the decisions of Higgins v. Smith and Brown v. Commissioner, supra, the Commissioner is entitled to consolidate the income of the taxpayer with that of Innisfail for the years in question.
Cited 13 timesPublished224 F. App'x 37 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 16, 2007
Rojas-Reyes v. INS, 235 F.3d 115, 126 (2d Cir.2000). … We cannot conclude that the Board abused its discretion in concluding that no such authority was demonstrated. See Gully v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNew York & Porto Rico S. S. Co. v. United States
29 F.2d 1014 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 10, 1928
In Baxter v. … Co. v. United States, 58 Ct.
Cited 2 timesPublished168 F.2d 649 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 20, 1948
Eq. 429, 176 A. 101 . 22 Paul v. … Co. v. Concrete Steel Bridge Co., 4 Cir., 37 F.2d 695 ; Manning v. Furr, 62 App. D.C. 281 , 66 F.2d 807 ; Feldman Inv. Co. v. Connecticut General Life Ins. Co., 10 Cir., 78 F.2d 838 ; Jos. Riedel Glass Works, Inc., v.
Modified by Marcus v. Otis, 169 F.2d 148 (1948)Cited 32 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 22, 2009
07-2721-cv Sassaman v. … of Elections (the “Board”) as an Elections Administrator, working under defendant- appellee David Gamache, the Republican Commissioner of the Board.
Cited 0 timesPublishedSniado, III v. Bank Austria Ag
378 F.3d 210 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 5, 2004
Hoffman-La Roche Ltd. v. Empagran S.A., ___ U.S. ___, 124 S.Ct. 2359 , 159 L.Ed.2d 226 (2004) (" Empagran "). See Bank Austria v. … See Sniado v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedIn the Matter of Instruments for Industry, Inc., Debtor-Appellee v. United States
496 F.2d 1157 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 28, 1974
United States v. Seckinger, 397 U.S. 203, 210 , 90 S.Ct. 880, 884 , 25 L.Ed.2d 224 (1970). … Sturm v. United States, 421 F.2d 723, 727 , 190 Ct.Cl. 691, 697 (1970). There can be no doubt that the interpretation favoring the contractor is “reasonable and practical.” See United States v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedCerbone v. International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union
768 F.2d 45 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 17, 1985
To support this assertion, it points out that, by the summer of 1981, the Joint Board’s deficit exceeded $1 million. . … O’Malley v.
Cited 96 timesPublished347 F.2d 86 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 17, 1965
In Powell v. … Likewise in Spampinato v. M.
Cited 65 timesPublishedShugrue v. Air Line Pilots Ass'n (In re Ionosphere Clubs, Inc.)
922 F.2d 984 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 21, 1990
Brown v. Pennsylvania State Employees Credit Union, 851 F.2d 81, 84 (3 Cir.1988). Accordingly, we review conclusions of law de novo, and findings of fact under a clearly erroneous standard. … In re *989 Manville, supra, 896 F.2d at 1388 ; Brown, supra, 851 F.2d at 84 . III.
Cited 61 timesPublished
Ask Donna