Case law

Chris-Craft Industries, Inc. v. Piper Aircraft Corporation

516 F.2d 172 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 9, 1975

Brown, Inc., 310 F.2d 420, 426 (1 Cir. 1962); United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. … See Mitchell v. Evelyn C. Brown, Inc., 310 F.2d 420, 425 (1 Cir. 1962) The instant case is quite different. Here the critical evidence is largely documentary.

United States Ex Rel. Frank Orlando, Relator-Appellant v. District Director of Immigration and Naturalization

222 F.2d 537 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 2, 1955

In Ohio Bell Telephone Company v. … his final classification, Bradley v.

Birnbaum v. Trussell

347 F.2d 86 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 17, 1965

In Powell v. … Likewise in Spampinato v. M.

Sehtam Corp. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

125 F.2d 655 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 2, 1942

The Board has sustained the commissioner. … Helvering v. Walbridge, 2 Cir., 70 F.2d 683 , certiorari denied 293 U.S. 594 , 55 S.Ct. 109 , 79 L.Ed. 688 ; Helvering v. Archbald, 2 Cir., 70 F.2d 720 , certiorari denied 293 U.S. 594 , 55 S.Ct. 109 , 79 L.Ed. 688 .

United States v. Pierce

147 F. 199 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 7, 1906

The Board of General Appraisers decided; and the court below affirmed that decision, that the importations should have been classified for duty under paragraph 699, of the present tariff act (Act July 24, 1897, c. 11, § 2 … It is sufficient to refer to the decision of this court in Hiller v. United States, 106 Fed. 73 , 45 C. C. A. 229 . But rossed pulp wood is not a manufactured timber in anytime sense.

Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 90,328 in Re International Business MacHines Corporate Securities Litigation Charles Kowal, Peter R. Herold, Albert Ominsky, Douglas Ominsky, Andrew Ominsky, Steven Horowitz, Dina Horowitz, Joan Howard, Mark Gardy, M.E. Lifshitz, Wai Chinn, Alexander Sands, Donald Lewis, Bruce Murphy, Barnett Stepak, and William Steiner v. International Business MacHines Corporation and Frank A. Metz, Jr.

163 F.3d 102 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 17, 1998

Moreover, the power to declare dividends is traditionally vested in a corporation's board of directors. See Burton v. Exxon Corp., 583 F.Supp. 405, 415 (S.D.N.Y.1984); Swinton v. W.J. … Partnership v.

Gargiul v. Tompkins

790 F.2d 265 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 14, 1986

Soucy v. Board of Education, 51 A.D.2d 628 , 378 N.Y.S.2d 500 (1976); Wolfson v. Board of Education, 47 A.D.2d 748 , 365 N.Y.S.2d 30 (1975). … See Lombard v. Board of Education, supra.

Rose Francis v. Elmsford School District

442 F.3d 123 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 22, 2006

442 F.3d 123 Rose FRANCIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ELMSFORD SCHOOL DISTRICT, Wayne Harders, Dr. Carol Franks-Randall and Board of Education Elmsford School District, Defendants-Appellees. Docket No. 05-0865 CV. … KEARSE, Circuit Judge. 1 Plaintiff Rose Francis, an employee of defendants Elmsford School District (the "District") and Board of Education Elmsford School District (the "Board"), appeals from so much of a judgment of the

STMicroelectronics, N v. v. Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC

648 F.3d 68 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 2, 2011

See SEC v. … Brown v. E.F. Hutton Grp., Inc., 991 F.2d 1020, 1032 (2d Cir.1993).

Lin Zhong v. United States Department of Justice, Attorney General Gonzales

461 F.3d 101 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 8, 2006

. § 1105a(c), a court lacks jurisdiction to consider a claim which has not first been presented to the Board .... ”); Ravindran v. … INS, 976 F.2d 754, 761 (1st Cir.1992) (“Issues not raised before the Board may not be raised for the first time upon judicial review of the Board’s decisions.... [This] requirement is jurisdictional.”); Rivera-Zurita v.

Neu v. Corcoran

869 F.2d 662 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 3, 1989

Id. 12 The Court again considered the issue of what constitutes a constitutional deprivation the following year in Board of Regents v. … Davis, supra, 424 U.S. at 709 , 96 S.Ct. at 1164 (quoting Board of Regents v. Roth, supra, 408 U.S. at 573 , 92 S.Ct. at 2707 )) (emphasis added). 24 Like Huntley, Brandt v.

United States v. Wallace

284 F. App'x 837 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 8, 2008

United States v. Brown, 352 F.3d 654, 660 (2d Cir.2003) (citing Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 97-98 , 106 S.Ct. 1712 , 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986)). … Snyder v.

United States Industrial Alcohol Co. v. Calmar S. S. Corp.

57 F.2d 182 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 4, 1932

The suit was to recover-for the loss of part of a deck cargo of dmms of lacquer thinner, which went by the board during heavy weather on a voyage from Baltimore to Los Angeles. … A.) 298 F. 935 ; Cudahy v. Munson Line (C. C. A.) 22 F.(2d) 898 ; Gerli v. Cunard S. S. Co. (C. C. A.) 48 F.(2d) 115 .

United States v. Earle R. Shepardson, Iii, Derek P. St. Don, David Maxwell

196 F.3d 306 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 4, 1999

See United States v. Brown, 169 F.3d 89, 93 (1st Cir.1999); United States v. Turnipseed, 159 F.3d 383, 385-86 (9th Cir.1998); United States v. Luna, 165 F.3d 316, 323-25 (5th Cir.1999). … See United States v. Stephenson, 183 F.3d 110, 119 (2d Cir.1999) (citing United States v. Brown, 98 F.3d 690, 692 (2d Cir.1996)).

Graves v. The W. F. Babcock

85 F. 978 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 2, 1898

Magee v. The Moss, Gilp. 219 , Fed. Cas. No. 8,944. The historical review by the supreme court in Robertson v. Baldwin, 165 U. S. 275 , 17 Sup. … Co. v. Ohio State Auditor, 165 U. S. 194 , 17 Sup. Ct. 305).

New Colonial Ice Co. v. Commissioner

66 F.2d 480 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 17, 1933

Hill v. Firemen’s Ins. Co. (D. C.) 25 F.(2d) 1007 . The petitioner could not prosecute an appeal from the Board of Tax Appeals with respect to the deficiency asserted against its predecessor. Carnation Milk Products v. … Woolford Realty Co. v. Rose, supra; Dalton v. Bowers, supra. Pioneer Pole & Shaft Co. v. Comm’r, 55 F.(2d) 861 (C. C. A. 6), and H. H. Miller Industries Co. v. Comm’r, 61 F.(2d) 412 (C. C.

Cole v. Hall

339 F.2d 881 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 7, 1965

See Vars v. International Bhd. of Boilermakers, 320 F.2d 576 (2 Cir. 1963). … We accepted arguendo the finding of the union trial board and the district court in that ease that the state *883 ment had been false and libelous, but we held this to be irrelevant: “The Trial Board * * * consisted of union

Time, Incorporated Newsweek, Inc. The Reuben H. Donnelley Corporation Mail Advertising Service Association International Direct Mail/marketing Association, Inc. Mail Order Association of America National Association of Greeting Card Publishers American Business Press, Inc. Associated Third Class Mail Users American Retail Federation Council of Public Utility Mailers United Parcel Service of America, Inc. v. United States Postal Service, Direct Mail/marketing Association, Inc. Dow Jones & Company the National Association of Greeting Card Publishers Association of American Publishers the Recording Industry Association of America, Inc. United Parcel Service of America, Inc. American Newspaper Publishers Association Advertisers Distribution Services Advertisers Postal Service Corp. Magazine Publishers Association Classroom Publishers Association March of Dimes Birth Defects Foundation National Newspaper Association Mail Order Association of America Parcel Shippers Association Time, Incorporated Newsweek, Inc. Council of Public Utility Mailers American Retail Federation American Bankers Association, Intervenors. Direct Mail/marketing Association, Inc. And Associated Third Class Mail Users v. United States Postal Service

685 F.2d 760 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 9, 1982

In Newsweek, Inc. v. … Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v.

Neu v. Corcoran

869 F.2d 662 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 3, 1989

Id. *666 The Court again considered the issue of what constitutes a constitutional deprivation the following year in Board of Regents v. … Davis, supra, 424 U.S. at 709 , 96 S.Ct. at 1164 (quoting Board of Regents v. Roth, supra, 408 U.S. at 573 , 92 S.Ct. at 2707 )) (emphasis added). Like Huntley, Brandt v.

Vander Malle v. Ambach

673 F.2d 49 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 4, 1982

Stemple v. Board of Education, 623 F.2d 893 , 898 (4th Cir. 1980). Moreover, Bruce has requested in writing that his parents retain the lawyer who filed this suit. … See Monahan v. Nebraska, 491 F.Supp. 1074 (D.Neb.1980), aff'd in part and vacated in part, 645 F.2d 592 (8th Cir. 1981); Stemple v. Board of Education, 623 F.2d 893 (4th Cir. 1980); Zvi D. v.