Case law

Motorola Credit Corp. v. Uzan

561 F.3d 123 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 31, 2009

Jason Brown, Ropes & Gray LLP, New York, NY, and David D. … MAY ORENSTEIN , Brown Rudnick LLP, New York, NY (David Molton, Brown Rudnick LLP, New York, NY and R.

Adler v. Education Department of New York

760 F.2d 454 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 25, 1985

Moreover, the district court said that in Board of Education v. … See also Flavin v. Connecticut State Board of Education, 553 F.Supp. 827, 831 (D.Conn.1982).

Eugene Rodriguez, and the United States of America Ex Rel. Eugene Rodriguez v. Paul D. McGinnis Commissioner of Correction, United States Ex Rel. Michael Katzoff v. Paul D. McGinnis Commissioner of Correction of the State of New York and John T. Deegan, Warden of Auburn State Prison, Auburn, New York, John Kritsky, and United States of America Ex Rel. John Kritsky v. Paul D. McGinnis Commissioner of Correction, Russell G. Oswald, Chairman of the Board of Parole, J. Edwin Lavallee, Warden of Clinton State Prison, New York State Board of Parole and New York State Department of Correction

456 F.2d 79 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 25, 1972

See England v. Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners, 375 U.S. 411 , 84 S.Ct. 461 , 11 L.Ed.2d 440 (1963); Lackawanna Police Benevolent Ass'n v. … I had thought that this was reasonably plain from McNeese v. Board of Education, 373 U.S. 668, 672 , 83 S.Ct. 1433 , 10 L.Ed.2d 622 (1963), Damico v.

Swedenburg v. Kelly

358 F.3d 223 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 12, 2004

In State Board of Equalization v. … In Brown-Forman Distillers Corp. v.

United States v. Lewis

111 F. App'x 52 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 5, 2004

See United States v. … United States v.

Samuel Grafton and Lyle Silversmith, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Brooklyn Law School

478 F.2d 1137 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 24, 1973

Board of Bar Examiners of New Mexico, 353 U.S. 232 , 77 S.Ct. 752 , 1 L.Ed.2d 796 (1957); Konigsberg v. … As that term is used in ordinary speech, this is precisely what the Board of Regents is not.

United States v. Walter Dennis Thomas, Also Known as Dennis Thomas

6 F.3d 960 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 8, 1993

In United States v. … See, e.g., Brown, 899 F.2d at 97-98 .

Frankel v. Slotkin

984 F.2d 1328 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 25, 1993

Frankel v. … In Kaster v. Modification Sys., Inc., 731 F.2d 1014 , 1019 (2d Cir.1984), this court held that a plaintiff could not simply assert futility of demand because the board was controlled by the alleged wrongdoer.

Hyman-Michaels Co. v. Fox

298 F. 440 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 7, 1924

Harper v. Hochstim (C. C. A.) 278 Fed. 102 , 20 A. L. R. 1232. … Even if it is true that a “received for transport” bill is the equivalent for the purposes of .this case to a “received on board” bill, the word “received” must mean in possession or within the custody and control of the

Vumi v. Gonzales

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 31, 2007

05-6185-ag Vumi v. … See INS v.

Pietrzak v. Mukasey

260 F. App'x 337 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 15, 2008

See INS v. … When one Board member decides to affirm the IJ’s decision without opinion, the regulation provides that "the Board shall issue an order that reads as follows: ‘The Board affirms, without opinion, the result of the decision

United States v. Mario Biaggi, Stanley Simon, Richard Biaggi, Peter Neglia, John Mariotta, and Bernard Ehrlich

909 F.2d 662 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 29, 1990

United States v. … Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274 , 97 S.Ct. 568 , 50 L.Ed.2d 471 (1977).

Gaf Corporation v. Circle Floor Co., Inc.

463 F.2d 752 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 5, 1972

In Apex Hosiery Co. v. … Similarly, in Perkins v.

United States v. Arthur J. Fisher

387 F.2d 165 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 4, 1968

United States v. Gibson, 310 F.2d 79, 80 (2 Cir. 1962). … This warning complies with that approved in Miranda v.

Winooski Hydroelectric Co. v. Five Acres of Land in East Montpelier & Berlin

769 F.2d 79 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 30, 1985

Farr v. State Highway Board, 122 Vt. 156, 161 , 166 A.2d 187, 190 (1960). … See Sharp v. Transportation Board, 141 Vt. 480, 486 , 451 A.2d 1074, 1076 (1982). While this alone would be enough to sustain the ruling, we also affirm the ruling as a matter of law.

Washington Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Massachusetts Municipal Wholesale Electric Co.

922 F.2d 92 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 18, 1990

VDPS supervises the utilities by reviewing proposed changes in rate schedules and by representing the consuming public before the Vermont Public Service Board (“Board”). Id. § 2(a)(6). … See Cambridge v.

Insurance Co. of North America v. S/S "Globe Nova"

820 F.2d 546 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 2, 1987

Courts generally hold that the same methods of measurement should be used at delivery and offloading, and that offloading measurements should be made on board the vessel. See, e.g., Unilever/Lever Bros. (PTY) Ltd. v. … M/V Stolt Spur, 583 F.Supp. 139, 142-43 (S.D.Tex.1984); Wesco International, Inc. v.

Gomez Heredia v. Sessions

865 F.3d 60 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 27, 2017

Hoxquelin Gomez Heredia seeks review of two decisions of the Board of Immigration Appeals denying him relief. … where the Board has acted in an arbitrary or capricious manner.” Indradjaja v. Holder, 737 F.3d 212, 218 (2d Cir. 2013) (internal quotation marks omitted). “Underlying questions of law are reviewed de novo.”

Soderberg v. Atlantic Lighterage Corporation

19 F.2d 286 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 2, 1927

Co. v. Rahn, 132 U. S. 518 , 10 S. Ct. 175 , 33 L. Ed. 440 ; Casement v. Brown, 148 U. S. 615, 622 , 13 S. Ct. 672 , 37 L. Ed. 582 ; Weinman v. De Palma, 232 U. S. 571 , 34 S. Ct. 370 , 58 L. Ed. 733 ; Ch., R. I. & Pac. … Ry. v. Bond, 240 U. S. 449, 456 , 36 S. Ct. 403 , 60 L. Ed. 735 ; Metcalf & Eddy v. Mitchell, 269 U. S. 514, 521 , 46 S. Ct. 172 , 70 L. Ed. 384 ; The Satilla, 235 F. 58 (C. C. A. 2); Foard v. Maryland, 219 F. 827 (C.

Yan Yue Chen v. Holder

446 F. App'x 383 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 30, 2011

10-4039-ag Chen v. … See Qin Wen Zheng v.