Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.85s
Firth Carpet Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
129 F.2d 633 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 21, 1942
B. v. Condenser Corp., 3 Cir., 128 F.2d 67 ; Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. N. L. R. B., 4 Cir., 127 F.2d 109 . Both of these are cases involving so-called “illegal” strikes. … The showing of delay is not sufficient to establish unreasonableness by the Board. N. L. R. B. v. Electric Vacuum Cleaner Co., 315 U.S. 685 , 62 S.Ct. 846 , 86 L.Ed.-; N. L. R. B. v. Isthmian S. S.
Cited 14 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Universal Camera Corp.
190 F.2d 429 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 13, 1951
Just where the Board’s specialized experience ends it may no doubt be hard to say; but we are to find the boundary and beyond it to deem ourselves as competent as the Board to pass upon issues of fact. … B. v. Universal Camera Corp., 2 Cir., 179 F.2d 749 . . Universal Camera Corp. v. N. L. R. B., 340 U.S. 474 , 71 S.Ct. 456 . . Phelps Dodge Corporation v. N. L. R.
Cited 58 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. American Mfg. Co.
106 F.2d 61 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 26, 1939
We held the procurement of just such a contract an unfair labor practice in National Labor Relations Board v. National Licorice Company, decided June 12, 1939. We also held in National Labor Relations Board v. … We therefore hold, as we did in National Labor Relations Board v.
Cited 24 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Chautauqua Hardware Corp.
192 F.2d 492 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 2, 1951
The Board’s decision is reported in 92 N.L.R.B.-(No. 232). 2 . … B. v. Sun Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co., 3 Cir., 135 F.2d 15, 20 . 4 . See N. L. R. B. v. Brezner Tanning Co., 1 Cir., 141 F.2d 62 ; N. L. R. B. v. Alco Feed Mills, 5 Cir., 133 F.2d 419, 421 .
Cited 10 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. National Broadcasting Co.
150 F.2d 895 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 27, 1945
Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 313 U.S. 146 , 61 S.Ct. 908 , 85 L.Ed. 1251 ; National Labor Relations Board v. … See National Labor Relations Board v. Isthmian S. S. Co., 2 Cir., 126 F.2d 598, 599 ; National Labor Relations Board v. John Engelhorn & Sons, 3 Cir., 134 F.2d 553, 557-8 ; South Atlantic S. S. Co. v.
Cited 21 timesPublishedCounty of Sullivan v. Civil Aeronautics Board
436 F.2d 1096 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 4, 1971
Justice Burton said, dissenting in Pan-Atlantic Steamship Corp. v. … demonstrated by CAB v.
Cited 5 timesPublished79 F.3d 256 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 14, 1996
Pension Plan v. … Meagher v. Pension Fund, No. 89 Civ. 8364 (MJL), 1992 WL 75128 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 30, 1992) ("Meagher I ").
Cited 0 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. International Brotherhood
228 F.2d 83 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 2, 1955
228 F.2d 83 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, CHAUFFEURS, WAREHOUSEMEN AND HELPERS OF AMERICA, LOCAL 182, UTICA, NEW YORK, AND VICINITY, AFL, Respondent. … , Universal Camera Corp. v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedABC Air Freight Co. v. Civil Aeronautics Board
391 F.2d 295 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 13, 1968
The Board’s decision does not measure up to the standards required by § 8(b) of the APA, as recently applied in Northeast Airlines, Inc. v. … We need not quarrel with the Board’s previously cited decision, sustained by the Seventh Circuit, American Airlines, Inc. v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedCohen v. West Haven Board of Police Commissioners
638 F.2d 496 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 23, 1980
See, e.g., United States v. City of Chicago, 549 F.2d 415, 439-40 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 875 , 98 S.Ct. 225 , 54 L.Ed.2d 155 (1977); Brown v. New Haven Civ. Serv. … See, e.g., Brown v. New Haven Civ. Serv. Bd., supra note 4; United States v. New York, 475 F.Supp. 1103 (N.D.N.Y.1979) (detailed findings of fact and conclusions of law reported at 21 Empl.Prac.Dec. 30, 314).
Cited 61 timesPublished243 F.3d 93 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 15, 2001
See Byrnie v. Town of Cromwell Pub. Schs., 73 F.Supp.2d 204 (D.Conn.1999). In the spring of 1995, the Cromwell Board of Education decided to hire a part-time art teacher for Cromwell High School. … Brown v. Coach Stores, Inc., 163 F.3d 706, 712 (2d Cir.1998).
Cited 595 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. National Container Corp.
211 F.2d 525 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 10, 1954
Under the Board’s Midwest Piping rule, as this Court pointed out in N. L. R. B. v. … Katz v. N. L. R. B., 9 Cir., 196 F.2d 411 ; N. L. R. B. v. F. H. McGraw & Co., 6 Cir., 206 F.2d 635 . The order of the Board will be enforced. 1 .
Criticized by Surprenant Mfg. Co. v. Bernard L. Alpert, as Regional Director, First Region, National Laborrelations Board, 318 F.2d 396 (1963)Cited 46 timesPublishedCivil Aeronautics Board v. Modern Air Transport, Inc.
179 F.2d 622 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 6, 1950
Brown & Sons Lumber Co. v. Louisville & N. R. Co., 299 U.S. 393 , 57 *625 S.Ct. 265, 81 L.Ed. 301 ; Texas & P. R. Co. v. Gulf, C. & S. F. R. … Corp. v.
Cited 59 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Moench Tanning Co.
121 F.2d 951 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 17, 1941
This case comes up upon a petition of the National Labor Relations Board for an order of this court to enforce an order of the Board against the respondent, a wholly owned subsidiary corporation of the Brown Shoe Company, … The clause which incorporates, verbatim et literatim, the contents of § 7 the court, as now constituted, thinks contrary to National Labor Relations Board v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. A.P.W. Products Co.
316 F.2d 899 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 25, 1963
B. v. … B. v.
Cited 52 timesPublishedIwachiw v. New York City Board of Elections
126 F. App'x 27 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 17, 2005
Plaintiff-appellant Walter Iwachiw appeals from two decisions of the District Court: (1) a memorandum and order, entered August 29, 2002, dismissing for lack of subject matter jurisdiction his claims against the New York State Board … of Elections and New York State (“the State Defendants”), and dismissing without prejudice his claims against the New York City Board of Elections and New York City (“the City Defendants”), for failure to comply with Rule
Cited 69 timesPublishedPrecision Fabricators, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
204 F.2d 567 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 22, 1953
As Judge Magruder said in National Labor Relations Board v. … See also National Labor Relations Board v. North Carolina Granite Corp., 4 Cir., 201 F.2d 409 . 4 . Paragraph 1(e) reads as follows: 5 . See National Labor Relations Board v.
Cited 44 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Mastro Plastics Corp.
214 F.2d 462 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 16, 1954
United States v. Boisdore’s Heirs, 8 How. 113 , 12 L.Ed. 1009 ; Duparquet Huot & Moneuse Co. v. Evans, 297 U.S. 216 , 56 S.Ct. 412 , 80 L.Ed. 591 . … In Local No. 3 etc. v. National Labor Relations Board, 8 Cir., 210 F.2d 325 , it was held that the employer had not been guilty of an unfair labor practice in the discharge of employees.
Cited 9 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board. v. Syracuse Stamping Co
208 F.2d 77 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 10, 1953
B. v. Chautauqua Hardware Corp., 2 Cir., 192 F.2d 492, 494 . … We agree with the court in John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. N. L. R. B., 89 U.S.App.D.C. 261 , 191 F.2d 483 , that “otherwise discriminate” includes discrimination in regard to the rehiring of an employee.
Cited 19 timesPublishedBonwit Teller, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
197 F.2d 640 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 17, 1952
N.L.R.B. v. American Furnace Co., 158 F.2d 376 . Similarly, in N.L.R.B. v. … In its brief, Bonwit Teller requests that we also review this action of the Board. But it is clear that we have no power to do so, A. F. L. v. N. L. R. B. 308 U.S. 401 , 60 S.Ct. 300 , 84 L.Ed. 347 ; N. L. R. B. v.
Cited 34 timesPublished
Ask Donna