Case law

Paul A. Dix v. Stanley R. Resor, Secretary of the Army

449 F.2d 317 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 24, 1971

It is settled in this Circuit that a decision of a conscientious objection review board will not be disturbed if there is a basis in fact for its finding. Rosengart v. Laird, 449 F.2d 523 (2 Cir. 1971); Lovallo v. … Compare Lovallo v. Resor, supra, with Helwick v. Laird, 438 F.2d 959 (5 Cir. 1971).

Zahra v. Town Of Southold

48 F.3d 674 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 21, 1995

Zahra v. Southold Town Board of Appeals, No. 7725-88, slip op. at 3 (N.Y.Sup.Ct. Nov. 17, 1988). … Brady, 863 F.2d at 211 -12 (citing Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 576-77 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2708-09 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972)).

Loeb v. United States

150 F. 327 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 4, 1906

The Board of General Appraisers and the Circuit Court sustained the classification upon the ground that it was very plain that the chief use to which this merchandise was put was that of embroidery cotton in connection with … machines, and that the case was controlled by Magone v.

United States v. Isiah Williams and Michael Manning

583 F.2d 1194 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 20, 1978

See United States v. Baller, supra note 6. … A distinction is required, also, between founding broad legal principles on current scientific “truths,” See generally, Buck v. Bell, 274 U.S. 200 , 47 S.Ct. 584 , 71 L.Ed. 1000 (1972); Brown v.

United States v. Harold Cattouse

846 F.2d 144 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 5, 1988

Later, at about 3:10 p.m., however, they saw a man matching the informant’s description of Cattouse entering the apartment house carrying a brown paper bag. … See Cardwell v.

Joe L. Barr, A/K/A Joseph L. Barr, (Re: 88-7230) v. United Parcel Service, Inc. And Local 804 of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, Local 804 of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, (Re: 88-7230), United Parcel Service, Inc., (Re: 88-7230), Joe L. Barr, A/K/A Joseph L. Barr, (Re: 88-7244) v. United Parcel Service, Inc., and Local 804 of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, United Parcel Service, Inc., (Re: 88-7244)

868 F.2d 36 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 10, 1989

Barr, Plaintiff-Appellee (re: 88-7230), v. … See DelCostello v.

Graves v. The W. F. Babcock

85 F. 978 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 2, 1898

Magee v. The Moss, Gilp. 219 , Fed. Cas. No. 8,944. The historical review by the supreme court in Robertson v. Baldwin, 165 U. S. 275 , 17 Sup. … Co. v. Ohio State Auditor, 165 U. S. 194 , 17 Sup. Ct. 305).

United States v. Jules Saint Prix, Glenn H. Hutchison, John Bennett, James T. Blakley and James R. Blakley

672 F.2d 1077 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 22, 1982

Petty Officer Jesus Vega boarded the shrimper and smelled marijuana. … United States v. Viserto, 596 F.2d 531, 536 (2d Cir. 1979). The tax evidence may include the failure to file tax returns. United States v.

Elliott H. Velger v. Donald F. Cawley, Police Commissioner, City of New York,defendants-Appellees

525 F.2d 334 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 9, 1975

Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972); Perry v. Sindermann, 408 U.S. 593 , 92 S.Ct. 2694 , 33 L.Ed.2d 570 (1972). 1. … The Requirements of Procedural Due Process: In light of the rationale behind both Board of Regents v. Roth, supra, and Perry v. Sindermann, supra, we must reverse the lower court’s judgment.

Seaboard Equipment Corp. v. Red Star Towing & Transportation Co.

270 F. 42 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 10, 1919

A. 431 ; Aldrich v. Penn. R. R. Co., 255 Fed. 330 , 166 C. C. A. 500 . The evidence here stands uncontradicted that the tow was made up in the usual way. … In Mulvaney v. King Paint Mfg. Co. 256 Fed. 621 , 167 C. C.

Cain v. Alpha SS Corporation

35 F.2d 717 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 20, 1929

Roberts v. Skolfield, Fed. Cas. No. 11,917; Anderson v. Ross, Fed. Cas. No. 361; Backstack v. Banks, Fed. Cas. No. 711; Hanson v. Fowle, Fed. Cas. No. 6,042; Thomas v. Lane, Fed. Cas. No. 13,902; Murray v. … Judge Brown, in The City of Alexandria, 17 F. 390 (D. C. S. D. N. Y.), recognized the absence of authority as strong evidence that the maritime law did not compel payment of indemnity for injuries due to negligence.

Pathe Exchange, Inc. v. Commissioner

77 F.2d 306 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 6, 1935

The Commissioner determined a deficiency which the Board has confirmed. … As the Board found that the duties were not reflected in the inventory, the return in question was proper and the deduction should have been allowed. *308 Le Bolt & Co. v. United States, 67 Ct.

In re Blumlein

55 F. 383 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 18, 1893

The importers appealed to the board of general appraisers, protesting that the entire importation was subject to duty only at 35 cents per pound. … There is nothing in the decision of the supreme court in Falk v. Robertson, 137 U. S. 225 , 11 Sup. Ct. Rep. 41, which conflicts with this *387 iüiírrpretation of the statute.

Allen v. Katz Agency, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan

677 F.2d 193 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 8, 1982

Allen argues that the Plan should be strictly construed in favor of the employee, *197 see Hoefel v. … See, e.g., Owens v. Haas, 601 F.2d 1242, 1250 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 980 , 100 S.Ct. 483 , 62 L.Ed.2d 407 (1979).

Magassouba v. Bondi

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 19, 2026

23-7221 Magassouba v. … See Punin v.

Alton Jones Foundation v. Chevron

97 F.3d 29 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 27, 1996

Shapiro, Mayer, Brown & Platt, New York City, Banks Brown, McDermott, Will & Emery, New York City, William I. Edlund, Craig E. Stewart, Pillsbury Madison & Sutro, San Francisco, CA, of counsel), for Defendant-Appellant. … Line, Inc. v.

United States v. John Doe, A/K/A Francisco Rodriquez, A/K/A Juan Velez S.

472 F.2d 982 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 7, 1973

A short time thereafter, customs agents arrested him as he was about to board a train to New York City. … United States v.

In Re Riggi Bros. Co.

42 F.2d 174 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 9, 1930

See First National Bank of Chelsea v. Fitts, 67 Vt. 57 , 30 A. 697 ; Symes v. Fletcher, 95 Vt. 431 , 115 A. 502 ; Wells v. Blodgett, 92 Vt. 330 , 104 A. 146 ; Niles v. Fuller, 101 Vt. 471 , 144 A. 375 . … If an act is done in this state in behalf of a foreign corporation and such act is authorized by the board of directors, or similar officers, or such act is done within the scope of authority given by such board, such act

United States Industrial Alcohol Co. v. Calmar S. S. Corp.

57 F.2d 182 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 4, 1932

The suit was to recover-for the loss of part of a deck cargo of dmms of lacquer thinner, which went by the board during heavy weather on a voyage from Baltimore to Los Angeles. … A.) 298 F. 935 ; Cudahy v. Munson Line (C. C. A.) 22 F.(2d) 898 ; Gerli v. Cunard S. S. Co. (C. C. A.) 48 F.(2d) 115 .

United States v. Arthur J. Fisher

387 F.2d 165 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 4, 1968

United States v. Gibson, 310 F.2d 79, 80 (2 Cir. 1962). … This warning complies with that approved in Miranda v.