Case law

Albert J. Wahba v. New York University and Severo Ochoa

492 F.2d 96 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 11, 1974

of Regents v. … See Russell v. Hodges, 470 F.2d 212, 210-217 (2 Cir. 1972); Simard v. Board of Education, 473 F.2d 988, 992 (2 Cir. 1973). 3 .

Lembcke v. United States (Lembcke, Third-Party-Defendants)

181 F.2d 703 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 1, 1950

Restatement, Conflict of Laws, § 121; Brown v. United States, 3 Cir., 164 F.2d 490 ; but compare Woodward v. United States, 8 Cir., 167 F.2d 774 . … Such was the decision in Brown v. United States, 3 Cir., 164 F.2d 490 . We agree also ■ with this case, and see no inconsistency between it and the Woodward case, supra.

In re Franklin Brewing Co.

249 F. 333 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 29, 1918

Mitchell v. Clark, 110 U. S. at page 643, 4 Sup. Ct. 170, 312, 28 L. Ed. 279 ; Canada, etc, Ry. v. Gebhard, 109 U. S. at page 539, 3 Sup. Ct. 363, 27 L. Ed. 1020 . … In Re Roger Brown & Co, 196 Fed. 758 , 116 C. C.

West Pub. Co. v. Lawyers' Co-Operative Pub. Co.

79 F. 756 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 8, 1897

Brown v. Winehill, 29 Pac. 927 . The question was as to propriety of allowing an item paid for stenographer’s minutes, as part of the costs of appeal. … Stimson Mill Co. v. Board of Harbor, 29 Pac. 938 .

Sperry Rand Corporation, John Presper Eckert, Jr., and John W. Mauchly v. Bell Telephone Laboratories, Inc.

317 F.2d 491 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 10, 1963

. § 146 ), 1 to review a decision of the Board of Patent Interferences determining the issue of priority of inven *492 tíon in favor of the defendant. … The district court reversed the decision of the Board and authorized the Commissioner of Patents to issue a patent to the plaintiffs.

Watson v. Geren

587 F.3d 156 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 30, 2009

Ward v. Brown, 22 F.3d 516, 522 (2d Cir.1994); see also Florida Power & Light Co. v. … Specifically, a Benefit Re *166 view Board misconstrued a fee statute despite established Supreme Court precedent. On such a point of law, courts owe agencies no deference. See INS v.

Molinari v. Bloomberg

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 28, 2009

See id. at 251. 5 In Mehiel v. County Board of Legislators, 571 N.Y.S.2d 808 (App. … Id. 5 The Board also cited Golden v. New York City Council, 762 N.Y.S.2d 410 (App.

American Sulphite Pulp Co. v. De Grasse Paper Co.

157 F. 660 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 7, 1907

Belting Co. v. N. J. Rubber Co., 137 U. S. 445 , 11 Sup. Ct. 193, 34 L. Ed. 741 . Mr. … Facts which may thus be considered without proof are such as are referred to by the Supreme Court in Brown v. Piper, 91 U. S. 37 , 23 L.

Joe L. Barr, A/K/A Joseph L. Barr, (Re: 88-7230) v. United Parcel Service, Inc. And Local 804 of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, Local 804 of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, (Re: 88-7230), United Parcel Service, Inc., (Re: 88-7230), Joe L. Barr, A/K/A Joseph L. Barr, (Re: 88-7244) v. United Parcel Service, Inc., and Local 804 of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, United Parcel Service, Inc., (Re: 88-7244)

868 F.2d 36 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 10, 1989

Barr, Plaintiff-Appellee (re: 88-7230), v. … See DelCostello v.

In Re Riggi Bros. Co.

42 F.2d 174 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 9, 1930

See First National Bank of Chelsea v. Fitts, 67 Vt. 57 , 30 A. 697 ; Symes v. Fletcher, 95 Vt. 431 , 115 A. 502 ; Wells v. Blodgett, 92 Vt. 330 , 104 A. 146 ; Niles v. Fuller, 101 Vt. 471 , 144 A. 375 . … If an act is done in this state in behalf of a foreign corporation and such act is authorized by the board of directors, or similar officers, or such act is done within the scope of authority given by such board, such act

United States v. Cambrelen

5 F. App'x 30 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 6, 2001

Brown, 776 F.2d 397, 403 (2d Cir.1985), cert. denied 475 U.S. 1141 , 106 S.Ct. 1793 , 90 L.Ed.2d 339 (1986). … United States v. Mowad, 641 F.2d 1067, 1073 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 817 , 102 S.Ct. 94 , 70 L.Ed.2d 86 (1981); see, e.g., United States v.

United States v. Guy Porter Gillette

420 F.2d 298 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 9, 1970

He expressly refused to rule that the board had denied the request for exemption because Gillette’s views were non-religious. … See United States v. Henderson, supra; United States v. Bolton, supra. Contra, United States v. Sisson, supra, 297 F. Supp. at 906-911 .

Vandell v. United States

6 F.2d 188 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 2, 1925

Gompers v. Buck’s Stove Co., 221 U. S. 418 , 31 S. Ct. 492 , 55 L. Ed. 797 , 34 L. R. A. (N. S.) 874; Duplex Printing Co. v. Deering, 254 U. S. 443 , 41 S. Ct. 172 , 65 L. Ed. 349 , 16 A. L. R. 196; United States v. … Ed. 1092 ; United States v. Cassidy (D. C.) 67 F. 698 ; United States v. Elliott (C. C.) 64 F. 27 . Indeed, the Sherman Act makes the conspiracy an offense against the national law. Knauer v.

Wanamaker v. Columbian Rope Company

108 F.3d 462 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 10, 1997

In March 1987, he informed the Columbian Board that he felt compelled to sue for age discrimination. … See Barber v. CSX Distrib. Svcs., 68 F.3d 694, 701 (3d Cir.1995) (retaliation claim under ADEA); Tomka v.

United States v. Village of Highland Falls

154 F.2d 224 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 11, 1946

Hurley, wrote a letter to the Board of Trustees of the Village, the Town Board, and the Board of Education, the material part of which appears in the margin. 1 The War Department has never made any effort to acquire the water … Reynolds, 50 App.Div. 575 , 64 N.Y.S. 199 ; Matter of Board of Water Commissioners, 71 App.Div. 544 , 76 N.Y.S. 11 ; Matter of Manhattan Ry. Co. v.

North American Soccer League v. National Football League

670 F.2d 1249 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 27, 1982

As we stated in Eiberger v. Sony Corp. of America, 622 F.2d 1068, 1076 (2d Cir. 1980) (quoting Chicago Board of Trade v. … As the Supreme Court noted in Brown Shoe Co. v.

Marvin v. Goord

255 F.3d 40 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 19, 2001

of Parole (“Board”) violated the ex post facto and due process clauses of the Constitution by denying his applications for work release and parole based on the Board’s classification of the crime for which he was convicted … In Nussle v.

Qin Wen Zheng v. Gonzales

500 F.3d 143 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 31, 2007

In Siewe v. … In Zhen Nan Lin v. U.S.

Jian Qiu Liu v. Holder

632 F.3d 820 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 24, 2011

09-5258-ag Jian Qui Liu v. … See Ivanishvili v. U.S.

Franklin Castillo, Relator-Appellant v. United States

391 F.2d 710 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 11, 1968

A parole violation warrant was. issued by the United States Board of Parole on October 10, 1966 but was not executed until April 28, 1967. … Section 4205 , 2 see Buchanan v. Blackwell, 372 F.2d 451 (5th Cir. 1967); Taylor v.