Case law

Carroll v. County of Monroe

712 F.3d 649 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 12, 2013

See, e.g., Altman v. City of High Point, 330 F.3d 194, 204-05 (4th Cir. -4- 2003); Brown v. Muhlenberg Twp., 269 F.3d 205, 211 (3d Cir. 2001); Fuller v. … See, e.g., Altman, 330 F.3d at 205-06; Brown, 269 F.3d at 210-11.

Krinsk v. Fund Asset Management

875 F.2d 404 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 31, 1989

P 94,437 Jeffrey KRINSK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. … Manning, New York City (Paul Windels III, Brown & Wood, New York City, of counsel), for defendant-appellee CMA Money Fund. Philip L. Kirstein, Sr.

Ad Hoc Committee of Concerned Teachers ex rel. Minor & Under-Age Students Attending Greenburgh Eleven Union Free School District v. Greenburgh 11 Union Free School District

873 F.2d 25 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 17, 1989

Each member of the Greenburgh Eleven School Board also serves on the Board of Directors of Children’s Village. … Rogers v. Paul, 382 U.S. 198 , 86 S.Ct. 358 , 15 L.Ed.2d 265 (1965); Bradley v. School Board of Richmond, 382 U.S. 103 , 86 S.Ct. 224 , 15 L.Ed. 2d 187 (1965) (per curiam); see generally 3 A.L.R.Fed. 325, § 3(b) (1970).

Distiso v. Town of Wolcott

352 F. App'x 478 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 5, 2009

Young v. … The court likewise did not consider this Court’s decision in Gant v. Wallingford Board of Education, 195 F.3d 134 (2d Cir.1999).

Simon Junger v. Hertz, Neumark & Warner

426 F.2d 805 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 6, 1970

See Smith v. Bear, 237 F.2d 79 (2d Cir. 1956); Remar v. Clayton Securities Corp., 81 F.Supp. 1014 (D. Mass.1949); Note, Federal Margin Requirements as a Basis for Civil Liability, 66 Colum.L.Rev. 1462, 1467-71 (1966). … See Sutro Bros. & Co., 41 SEC at 451-52; Meisel v. New Jersey Trust Co., 218 F. Supp. 274, 277 (S.D.N.Y.1963).

Qing Song Lin v. United States Department of Homeland Security

355 F. App'x 451 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 22, 2009

See Yan Chen v. Gonzales, 417 F.3d 268, 271 (2d Cir.2005). We review the agency’s factual findings under the substantial evidence standard. 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (b)(4)(B); see Corovic v. … See Niang v. Mukasey, 511 F.3d 138, 147 (2d Cir.2007).

Hendricks v. Gonzalez

67 F. 351 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 16, 1895

Little v. Bareme, 2 Cranch, 170 ; Otis v. Bacon, 7 Cranch, 589 . It is provided by statute (Rev. St. U. … S. v. Trumbull, 48 Fed. 99 . . There was no error prejudicial to the defendant in the rulings of the trial judge.

Oneida Nav. Co. v. L. Richardson & Co.

282 F. 241 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 29, 1922

Adams v. Bortz, 279 Fed. 521 . … Bowring v. Thebaud, 56 Fed. 520 , 5 C. C. A. 640 ; The Eugene Vesta (D. C.) 28 Fed. 762 ; Cohn v. Davidson, 2 Q. B. D. 455; The_ Caledonia, 157 U. S. 124 , 15 Sup. Ct. 537, 39 L. Ed. 644 .

Okin v. Securities & Exchange Commission

134 F.2d 333 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 10, 1942

National Labor Relations Board v. Friedman-Harry Marks Clothing Co., 2 Cir., 83 F.2d 731 .

Ad-Hoc Committee of the Baruch Black & Hispanic Alumni Ass'n v. Bernard M. Baruch College

835 F.2d 980 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 22, 1987

See Perry Education Ass’n v. … See also Searcey v.

United States v. Theron Clark

498 F.2d 535 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 5, 1974

On May 24, 1972, appellant attempted to board a domestic flight at LaGuardia Airport. 1 At the boarding gate a marshal and an airline supervisor, who had already been informed that there was a “selectee” on this flight, noted … In United States v.

Hudson Transit Lines, Inc., Hudson Transit Corp. v. United States of America, Interstate Commerce Commission and Pine Hill-Kingston Bus Corp., Hudson Transit Lines, Inc., Hudson Transit Corp. v. United States of America, Interstate Commerce Commission and Adirondack Transit Lines, Inc., American Bus Association, Intervenor. State of New Jersey, Dept. Of Transportation v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America

765 F.2d 329 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 17, 1985

Hudson appealed the Board's determination to the Interstate Commerce Commission, which summarily affirmed the Board's decisions. 24 Hudson then petitioned the ICC for extraordinary relief. … See, e.g., Port Norris Express Co. v. ICC, 751 F.2d 1280 (D.C.Cir.1985); Port Norris Express Co. v. ICC, 746 F.2d 69 (D.C.Cir.1984); Erickson Transport Corp. v.

Mortgage Lenders Network, USA v. Sensenich

393 F.3d 97 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 14, 2004

The United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Vermont (Brown, /.) awarded summary judgment to the trustee, and the United States District Court for the District of Vermont (Murtha, J.) affirmed. … See Mortgage Lenders Network, USA v. Sensenich, 2004 Vt. 107 , 2004 WL 2415880 (Vt.

Randolph Phillips v. Securities and Exchange Commission

388 F.2d 964 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 16, 1968

Perhaps most important was the absence of the common provision whereby a purchaser of stock from those in control of a corporation could secure a majority of the board of directors, see Essex Universal Corp. v. … On December 4, 1963, they installed a new board of directors with Kirby as chairman. 5 .

Patrickson v. U.S. Department of Labor

303 F. App'x 904 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 18, 2008

Sprout, Inc. v. United States, 8 F.3d 118, 123 (2d Cir.1993). … Because Patrickson does not contest the Board’s de novo review of the ALJ’s findings, however, we deem any such challenge waived. See Robinson v.

John F. Curran, Jr. v. Richard C. Lee, Mayor, City of New Haven the City of New Haven, and Its Agents

484 F.2d 1348 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 3, 1973

McNair, 413 U.S. 734 , 93 S.Ct. 2868 , 37 L.Ed.2d 923 (1973); Tilton v. Richardson, 403 U.S. 672 , 91 S.Ct. 2091 , 29 L. Ed.2d 790 (1971); Board of Education v. … New Haven, Conn., Charter, vol. 1, § 62 (1971) : “The board of finance, upon recommendation of the board of aldermen, may make appropriations for public receptions, parades, concerts, and celebrations to an amount not exceeding

Joseph Franza, Cross-Appellee v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 671 and Thomas Robidoux, Cross-Appellants

869 F.2d 41 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 14, 1989

Board of Trustees of the Plan. … See Duncan v.

Chenango Textile Corp. v. Commissioner of Int. Rev.

148 F.2d 296 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 23, 1945

In Carroll-McCreary v. … In Commissioner of Internal Revenue v.

Michel v. Yale University

110 F.4th 551 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 7, 2024

23-222 Michel v. … See Anderson v.

In re Franklin Brewing Co.

249 F. 333 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 29, 1918

Mitchell v. Clark, 110 U. S. at page 643, 4 Sup. Ct. 170, 312, 28 L. Ed. 279 ; Canada, etc, Ry. v. Gebhard, 109 U. S. at page 539, 3 Sup. Ct. 363, 27 L. Ed. 1020 . … In Re Roger Brown & Co, 196 Fed. 758 , 116 C. C.