Case law

United States v. Brewer

92 F. 343 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 30, 1899

S. v. Brewer (filed to-day) 92 Fed. 341 . The various documents required by the treasury regulations were presented to the collector. … S. v. Eanlett, 19 Sup.

Elizabeth Robinson v. Transworld Airlines, Inc.

947 F.2d 40 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 17, 1991

See Baylis v. Marriott Corp., 843 F.2d 658, 662 (2d Cir. 1988). Voluntary binding arbitration is the only alternative to resolution by an Adjustment Board. 45 U.S.C. §§ 157-159 . … See Montana v. First Fed. Savings and Loan Ass’n, 869 F.2d 100, 103 (2d Cir.1989).

SSC Corp. v. Town of Smithtown

66 F.3d 502 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 19, 1995

For recyclables, the Board designated the adjacent town recycling center. … By resolution of the Town Board, Smithtown withheld more than $750,000 in contract payments from SSC.

Weiner v. Gutfreund

68 F.3d 554 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 13, 1995

The defendants appealed the Secretary’s decision to the NYSE Board. The Board affirmed in a thorough opinion. … In Luckie v.

Rashid v. Mukasey

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 16, 2008

07-2064-ag Rashid v. … See Johnson v.

Sayers v. Rochester Telephone Corporation Supplemental Management Pension Plan

7 F.3d 1091 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 28, 1993

Seiden Assocs. v. ANC Holdings, Inc., 959 F.2d 425, 428 (2d Cir.1992); accord, Care Travel Co. v. Pan American World Airways, Inc., 944 F.2d 983, 987 (2d Cir.1991); W.W.W. Assocs. v. … Breed v.

Duarte v. Holder

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 6, 2010

Petition for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals denying a motion to reopen removal proceedings. … The Board of Immigration Appeals (the "BIA") affirmed on September 5, 2001. B.

Bennett v. Lucier

239 F. App'x 639 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 5, 2007

Bronx Household of Faith v. Bd. of Educ., 331 F.3d 342, 349 (2d Cir.2003). … Postal Workers Union v. U.S. Postal Serv., 766 F.2d 715 , 722 (2d Cir. 1985); accord Savage v.

Crawford v. Cuomo

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 11, 2015

Brown,  Prindle’s supervisor, as well as others.3  The complaint alleged that Brown,  who  failed  to  take  action  against  Prindle  despite  receiving  more  than  20  inmate  grievances  alleging  similar  abuse,  … See Whitley v. 

Maldonado v. Flynn

671 F.2d 729 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 9, 1982

Gartenberg v. … Oct. 12, 1979); Maldonado v. Flynn, 485 F.Supp. 274 (S.D.N.Y.1980); Maher v. Zapata Corp., 490 F.Supp. 348 (S.D.Texas 1980); Maher v. Zapata Corp., Civ. Action No.

Luria Bros. v. Alliance Assurance Co.

780 F.2d 1082 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 10, 1986

R.Civ.P. 15(b); Browning Debenture Holders’ Committee v. DAS A Corp., 560 F.2d 1078, 1086 (2d Cir.1977). Here, it is clear that the issue of restitution was not tried by the express consent of the parties. … McLean-Behm Steel Erectors, Inc. v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission, 608 F.2d 580, 582 (5th Cir.1979); see Browning Debenture Holders’ Committee, 560 F.2d at 1086 .

Lockheed Martin Corporation, Ace USA v. Lorraine Morganti, Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor

412 F.3d 407 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 24, 2005

(“Board”), reversing the findings of Administrative Law Judge Paul H. … In McCarthy v.

Lesnik v. Public Industrials Corporation

144 F.2d 968 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 7, 1944

The relationship between a stockholder in a corporation and the members of its board of directors is “in a sense fiduciary,” Von Au v. … Co., 7 Cir., 132 F.2d 850, 853-855 , and Thompson v. Cranston, D.C.W.D.N.Y., 2 F.R.D. 270 , which was affirmed by us in Brown v. Cranston, 2 Cir., 132 F.2d 631 , 148 A.L.R. 1178 , certiorari denied Cranston v.

Quinn v. Southgate Nelson Corporation

121 F.2d 190 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 30, 1941

Blumenthal & Co. v. United States, 2 Cir., 1929, 30 F.2d 247, 248, 249 ; Sloan Shipyards v. United States Fleet Corp., 1922, 258 U.S. 549, 567, 568 , 42 S.Ct. 386 , 66 LEd. 762. … We think our opinion in United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp. v.

United States Ex Rel. Phillips v. Downer

135 F.2d 521 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 7, 1943

This claim, together with other claims for deferred classification, was disapproved by the local board, and thereafter by the appeal board, after a hearing conducted by the Department of Justice according to the statute cited … In the recent case of United States v.

Long v. Silver Line, Ltd.

48 F.2d 15 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 6, 1931

When Long came on board he proceeded from the main deek down to the between-decks and thence into tank No. 2. He saw Corris go into tank No. 1. … Hardie v. N. Y. Harbor Dry Dock Corp., 9 F.(2d) 545 (C. C. A. 2).

Federal Trade Commission v. International Paper Company, a Corporation

241 F.2d 372 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 14, 1956

Relying upon Board of Governors of Federal Reserve System v. … Federal Power Comm. v. Metropolitan Edison Co., 304 U.S. 375 , 58 S.Ct. 963 , 82 L.Ed. 1408 ; In re National Labor Relations Board, 304 U.S. 486 , 58 S.Ct. 1001 , 82 L.Ed. 1482 . 2 .

SEIU v. NLRB

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 1, 2011

10-3616-ag SEIU v. … NLRB v.

Oceanic Steam Nav. Co. v. Corcoran

9 F.2d 724 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 27, 1925

It was also argued that, as the contract was to be chiefly performed on board of a British vessel and to be finally completed in Great Britain, and the damage occurred in that country, the contract was governed by English … The decisions which support the exception were both rendered in the District Court for the Southern district of New York, one decided in 1890, and the other in 1894 by Judge Brown.

Mulvana v. The Anchoria

83 F. 847 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 1, 1897

general account of the injury is stated by the district judge as follows: “On the evening of September 22, 1894, about 8 o’clock, the libelant’s son, about ihree years of age, a passenger, with his father and mother, on board … The libelant invokes the proper and rigorous obligations of care and caution which the law imposes upon carriers of- passengers for hire, and which are stated in Pennsylvania Co. v. Roy, 102 U. S. 451 , Steamboat Co. v.