Case law

Dlc Management Corp. v. Town Of Hyde Park

179 F.3d 63 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 6, 1999

Town Board of The Town of Hyde Park and Planning Board of Hyde Park, Defendants-Appellees-Cross Appellants, Nancy Alden and Evelyn Crispell, Defendants. Nos. 97-7932(L), 97-7934(CON), 97-9004(XAP). … DLC Management Corp. v.

Travis v. Owego-Apalachin School District

927 F.2d 688 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 28, 1991

See, e.g., Deeper Life Christian Fellowship v. Board of Educ., 852 F.2d 676 , 679 (2d Cir.1988); Calash v. City of Bridgeport, 788 F.2d 80, 82 (2d Cir.1986). … See Widmar v. Vincent, 454 U.S. 263, 270-75 , 102 S.Ct. 269, 274-77 , 70 L.Ed.2d 440 (1981), see also Board of Educ. v.

In Re Mandell

69 F.2d 830 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 12, 1934

PALMER v. KENNEDY. No. 336. Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. March 12, 1934. *831 Joseph G. M. Browne, of Brooklyn, N. Y., for appellant. Delatour, Kennedy & Miller, of Brooklyn, N. Y. (Harold M. … General Order No. 44 does not cover the field exclusively; it may be supplemented by local rules (see Weil v. Neary, 278 U. S. 160, 169 , 49 S. Ct. 144 , 73 L. Ed. 243 ), but not contradicted by them.

United States v. Kaibney

155 F.2d 795 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 22, 1946

See Graham v. Pennsylvania Ins. Co., C.C.Pa., 10 Fed.Cas. pages 935, 939, No. 5,674. The original invoices would naturally be in Jacob Kaibney’s files; but he told Brown that he had no records except check stubs. … Brown then went with Kaibney’s permission to the records *797 of Needle Arts Agencies and in its files found copies of its invoices to Kaibney and had photostats made of them.

Howard K. Andrews v. Education Association of Cheshire

829 F.2d 335 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 21, 1987

The decision is reported as Andrews v. Education Ass’n of Cheshire at 653 F.Supp. at 1373 (D.Conn.1987). … Detroit Board of Education, 431 U.S. 209 , 97 S.Ct. 1789 , 52 L.Ed.2d 261 (1977).

County Of Suffolk v. Long Island Lighting Company

728 F.2d 52 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 25, 1984

Consumer Protection Board v. … County of Suffolk v. Long Island Lighting Co., supra, 554 F.Supp. at 408-09 . See N.Y.Civ.Prac.Law Secs. 7801-7806 (McKinney 1981 & Supp.1982); Consumer Protection Board v.

Oceanic Steam Nav. Co. v. Corcoran

9 F.2d 724 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 27, 1925

It was also argued that, as the contract was to be chiefly performed on board of a British vessel and to be finally completed in Great Britain, and the damage occurred in that country, the contract was governed by English … The decisions which support the exception were both rendered in the District Court for the Southern district of New York, one decided in 1890, and the other in 1894 by Judge Brown.

Commack Self-Service Kosher Meats, Inc. v. Weiss

294 F.3d 415 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 21, 2002

McCollum v. … Ran-Dav's County Kosher v.

Cibao Meat Products v. NLRB

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 4, 2008

“Our review is deferential: ‘This court reviews the Board’s legal conclusions to ensure they have a reasonable basis in law. In so doing, we afford the Board a degree of legal leeway.’” Id. (quoting NLRB v. … See DeVito v.

Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,420

991 F.2d 1020 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 1, 1982

Brown v. Hutton Group, 795 F.Supp. 1317 (S.D.N.Y.1992). … Brown, 876 F.2d at 1529 (11th Cir.); Kennedy v. Josephthal & Co., 814 F.2d 798, 804 (1st Cir.1987); Zobrist v.

Valley Disposal, Inc., Palisades Landfill and Recycling Corporation and Robert C. Dowdell, Jr., Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants v. Central Vermont Solid Waste Management District, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. C v. Landfill Inc.

71 F.3d 1053 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 8, 1995

In Brown v. … Sec. 1988 even after it dismissed the underlying complaint. 50 Our decision in Brown v.

United States ex rel. Williams v. Zelker

445 F.2d 451 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 2, 1971

In Brown v. … The decisions in Brown v. Allen and Roberts v. LaVallee, supra, make it clear that the exhaustion doctrine is not based on “the mere possibility of a successful application to the state courts.” 389 U.

Barnes v. Cavazos

966 F.2d 1056 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 5, 1992

See, e.g., Harris v. City of Zion, 927 F.2d 1401, 1419 (7th Cir.1991) (J. Easterbrook, dissenting); Board of Education of the City of Chicago v. Sanders, slip op. no. 90-C-3063 (N.D.Ill. … Barrera v. Wheeler, 531 F.2d 402, 406-07 (8th Cir.1976); see also Schmidt, 699 F.2d at 10 n. 7. School boards may, of course, exceed constitutional limits in their method of allocating funds.

Gill v. Mooney

824 F.2d 192 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 16, 1987

Hewitt v. Helms, 459 U.S. 460, 471 , 103 S.Ct. 864, 871 , 74 L.Ed.2d 675 (1983); see Board of Pardons v. Allen, — U.S. -,- _ n. 10, 107 S.Ct. 2415 , 2421 n. 10, 96 L.Ed.2d 303 (1987). … Olim v. Wakinekona, 461 U.S. 238, 249 , 103 S.Ct. 1741, 1747 , 75 L.Ed.2d 813 (1983) (quoting Connecticut Board of Pardons v. Dumschat, 452 U.S. 458, 466-67 , 101 S.Ct. 2460, 2465 , 69 L.Ed.2d 158 (1981)).

United States v. Bache

59 F. 762 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 9, 1894

The circuit court, upon appeal, reversed the decision of the board of general appraisers. … The cases of Marriott v. Brune, 9 How. 619 , Lawrence v. Caswell, 13 How. 488 , and U. S. v.

Red "R" S. S. Co. v. North American Transport Co.

91 F. 168 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 7, 1898

This construction was apparently approved by both counsel and court in Laing v. Hollway, 3 Q. B. Div. 437, but the decision turned upon the duration of a day, whether 12 or 24 hours. The Glendevon [1893] Prob. … Judge Brown finds as follows in regard to the time spent in loading: “The vessel loaded at Newport News.

Firmanto v. Mukasey

259 F. App'x 366 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 4, 2008

See Yan Chen v. Gonzales, 417 F.3d 268, 271 (2d Cir. 2005). We review de novo questions of law and the application of law to undisputed fact. See, e.g., Secaida-Rosales v. INS, 331 F.3d 297, 307 (2d Cir.2003). … . § 1252 (b)(4)(B); see Too Jiang v. Gonzales, 500 F.3d 137, 140 (2d Cir.2007). But we will vacate and remand for new findings if the agency’s reasoning was sufficiently flawed. Cao He Lin v. U.S.

Scalisi v. Fund Asset Management

380 F.3d 133 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 17, 2004

] in order to maintain their position on the board." … See Brehm v.

Emmanuel D. Patterson v. Thomas A. Coughlin, Iii, Charles P. Hernandez (Sic Charles P. Hermanderz), Harold J. Smith, N. Desantos

761 F.2d 886 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 9, 1985

Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 335 (1976). See also Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill, — U.S. -, -, 105 S.Ct. 1487, 1494 (1985); Hewitt v. Helms, supra, 459 U.S. at 473 . … Monroe, supra, 365 U.S. at 183 ; Patsy v. Board of Regents, 457 U.S. 496, 516 (1982).

Western Union Tel. Co. v. Commissioner of Int. Rev.

68 F.2d 16 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 18, 1933

Central Securities Corp. v. United States, 54 F.(2d) 122, 126 (D. C. S. N. Y.) ; Gifford v. Corrigan, 117 N. Y. 257 , 22 N. E. 756 , 6 L. R. A. 610, 15 Am. St. Rep. 508 ; Butler v. State Mut. Life Assur. … The Board of Tax a 1 ij.ii, * «it. • v -u-i-j. • • Appeals held that “there is a liability m equi- , ,, , „ . , ,, ,, , J ,, ty on the part of this stockholder to pay these taxes of the corporations from its retained share