Case law

United States v. Bedell

311 F. App'x 461 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 24, 2009

See, e.g., Richards v. Wisconsin, 520 U.S. 385, 394 , 117 S.Ct. 1416 , 137 L.Ed.2d 615 (1997) United States v. Brown, 52 F.3d 415, 421 (2d Cir.1995). … See, e.g., Brown, 460 U.S. at 739-40 , 103 S.Ct. 1535 (citing United States v. Lee, 274 U.S. 559, 563 , 47 S.Ct. 746 , 71 L.Ed. 1202 (1927)).

Doe v. Pataki

120 F.3d 1263 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 25, 1997

Nixon v. … See, e.g., North Haven Board of Education v. Bell, 456 U.S. 512, 526-27 , 102 S.Ct. 1912, 1920-21 , 72 L.Ed.2d 299 (1982); see also United States v.

New York Trust Co. v. Commissioner

68 F.2d 19 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 18, 1933

The Board held against the petitioner upon both points. … The Board was plainly right on the first point. More is to be said for the taxpayer on the second, in spite of the fact that two eireuits have ruled against him already. Johnson v. Commissioner, 53 F.(2d) 726 (C. C.

Crumpton v. Bridgeport Education Association

993 F.2d 1023 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 17, 1993

In so doing, the district court held that Wygant v. … New York City Employees' Retirement System v.

Morning Mist Holdings Ltd. v. Krys

714 F.3d 127 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 16, 2013

11-4376-cv Morning Mist Holdings Ltd. v. … Id. at 120; 8 see also United States v.

Dyncorp v. Dir., Owcp

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 7, 2011

09-4976-ag Dyncorp v. … We review the Board’s decision for adherence to the Board’s statutory standard of review, Rasmussen v. Gen. Dynamics Corp., Elec. Boat Div., 993 F.2d 1014, 1015-16 (2d.

Ring v. Spina

148 F.2d 647 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 19, 1945

United States, 282 U.S. 30 , 51 S.Ct. 42 , 75 L.Ed. 145 ; Fox Film Corp. v. Muller, 296 U.S. 207 , 56 S.Ct. 183 , 80 L.Ed. 158 ; Youngclaus v. Omaha Film Board of Trade, D.C. Neb., 60 F.2d 538, 540 . … Thomas v. City of Richmond, 79 U.S. 349 , 12 Wall. 349 , 20 L.Ed. 453 ; City of Parkersburg v. Brown, 106 U.S. 487, 503 , 1 S.Ct. 442 , 27 L.Ed. 238 ; Logan County Nat. Bank v.

Cement League v. National Labor Relations Board

688 F. App'x 53 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 21, 2017

16-0495-ag(L) The Cement League, et al. v. NLRB, et al. … In so doing, we afford the Board a degree of legal 21 leeway.” Long Island Head Start Child Dev. Servs. v.

United States v. Lotsch

102 F.2d 35 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 27, 1939

Pointer v. United States, 151-U.S. 396, 400-404, 14 S.Ct. 410 , 38 L.Ed. 208 ; Dolan v. United States, 8 Cir., 133 F. 440 ; Corbin v. United States, 5 Cir., 264 F. 659 ; Clifton v. … That was "indeed held in Commonwealth v. Donovan, 170 Mass. 228 , 49 N.E. 104 ; but State v. Walls, 54 Ind. 561 , is to the contrary, and so is United States v. Green, D.C., 136 F. 618 . Burton v.

Greylock Mills v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

31 F.2d 655 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 1, 1929

See Myers v. De Mier, 52 N. Y. 647 ; Scudder v. Lehman, 142 App. Div. 631 , 127 N. Y. S. 470; Brede v. Rosendale Terrace Co., 216 N. Y. 246, 250 , 110 N. E. 430 ; Boston & Worcester St. Ry. Co. v. … See Bowers v. N. Y. & Albany Lighterage Co., 273 U. S. 346 , 351, 47 S. Ct. 389 , 71 L. Ed. 676 . The order of the Board of Tax Appeals is affirmed.

MHANY Mgmt., Inc. v. Cty of Nassau

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 23, 2016

Smith v.  … Comer v. 

Touche Ross & Co. v. Sec

609 F.2d 570 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 10, 1979

Board of Tax Appeals, 270 U.S. 117 (1926), the Supreme Court upheld the power of the Board of Tax Appeals to adopt rules of practice for professionals appearing before it as a necessary adjunct to the Board's power to protect … Goldsmith v. Board of Tax Appeals,supra. 46 Accordingly, we hold that the district court properly refused to enjoin the Commission from proceeding against Touche Ross pursuant to Rule 2(e).

Husain v. Springer

494 F.3d 108 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 13, 2007

See Board of Regents v. Southworth, 529 U.S. 217, 232-33 , 120 S.Ct. 1346 , 146 L.Ed.2d 193 (2000) (citing Rosenberger, 515 U.S. at 841 , 115 S.Ct. 2510 ). … Loce v.

Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Stevens

78 F.2d 713 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 24, 1935

The Board found that the firm’s books of account recorded the securities regularly inventoried at market. … United States v. United Verde Copper Co., 196 U. S. 207 , 25 S. Ct. 222 , 49 L. Ed. 449 ; In re Clicquot Club Co. v. United States (D. C.) 13 F.(2d) 655 . -Decision affirmed.

North Clymer Farm Service, Inc. v. Agway, Inc.

2 F. App'x 114 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 18, 2001

The complaint failed to state a claim on which relief can be granted, for “[t]he antitrust laws ... were enacted for ‘the protection of competition, not competitors.’ ” Brunswick Corp. v. … Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc., 429 U.S. 477, 488 , 97 S.Ct. 690 , 50 L.Ed.2d 701 (1977) (quoting Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 320 , 82 S.Ct. 1502 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 (1962) (emphasis in Brown Shoe)).

The Fifth Avenue Peace Parade Committee, an Unincorporated Association v. L. Patrick Gray 3rd, Acting Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation

480 F.2d 326 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 12, 1973

Brown v. Thompson, 430 F.2d 1214, 1216 (5th Cir. 1970); Swanner v. United States, 406 F.2d 716 (5th Cir. 1969). … (Plaintiffs’ Complaint ¶¶ 9 & 13, Laird v. Tatum, supra.) . Cases such as Hentoff v.

Williams v. Potter

223 F. 423 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 13, 1915

Williams v. Molther, 180 Fed. 709 , 103 C. C. A. 491 . … Williams v. Molther, 198 Fed. 460 , 117 C. C. A. 220 .

Davis v. Town of Hempstead

167 F. App'x 235 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 24, 2006

See Patterson v. … It is undisputed, however, that the Town Board issued a resolution providing the individual defendants authority to enter plaintiff’s property and destroy the garage and rack. See Gronowski v.

De Coppet v. Helvering

108 F.2d 787 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 15, 1940

Burrall v. Bushwick R. R. Co., 75 N.Y. 211, 216 ; Plimpton v. Bigelow, 93 N.Y. 592, 600 ; Van Brocklen v. Smeallie, 140 N.Y. 70, 78 , 35 N.E. 415 . Though see Flynn v. Brooklyn City R. R. … It is from that background that § 23 (e) (2) speaks, and the Board was right in holding that here there was but a single investment. In Hagerman v.

Pepsico, Inc. v. The Coca-Cola Company

315 F.3d 101 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 24, 2002

See AD/SAT v. Associated Press, 181 F.3d 216 , 226 (2d Cir.1999); cf. Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 325 , 82 S.Ct. 1502 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 (1962). … Brown Shoe, 370 U.S. at 324 , 82 S.Ct. 1502 ; see Areeda & Hovenkamp, supra, ¶5 3a, at 156.