Case law

Universal Carloading & Distributing Co. v. Pedrick

184 F.2d 64 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 26, 1950

See Despatch Shops v. Railroad Retirement Board, 2 Cir., 154 F.2d 417, 418 . … In Universal Carloading & Distributing Co. v. Railroad Retirement Board, 84 U.S.

Erlanger v. United States

154 F. 949 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 6, 1907

S. v. Godillot & Co., 139 Fed. 1 , 71 C. C. A. 505 . … S. v. Herrman, 91 Fed. 116 , 35 C. C. A. 400 .

The Newton Bay

36 F.2d 729 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 2, 1929

The Coast Guard officers boarded her and found the hatch on the after deck was not sealed. A cargo of 4,113 packages of liquors, valued at $51,000, was on board, and also some rotten fish in the lower hold. … The manifest is for the protection of the ship and the owners of the cargo-, and it is the duty of the master to take it on board and carefully preserve it. New York & Cuba Mail S. S. Co. v. United States (D.

Larsen v. NMU Pension Trust

902 F.2d 1069 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 2, 1990

Krijn v. … In Miles v.

United States v. Calvente

722 F.2d 1019 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 15, 1983

At 11:15 p.m., DEA agents observed Molina-Santiago and Santiago-Colon leaving the Bronx building with a brown paper bag. … United States v. Faruolo, 506 F.2d 490, 495 (2d Cir.1974); United States v.

Singh v. City of New York

524 F.3d 361 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 29, 2008

06-2969-cv Singh v. … IBP, Inc. v.

American Diamond Lines, Inc. v. McAllister Towing & Transportation Co.

101 F.2d 45 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 9, 1939

Line v. … The Leader, supra; Worrall v. Davis Coal & Coke Co., 2 Cir., 122 F. 436 ; Bramble v. Culmer, 4 Cir., 78 F. 497 . In Bramble v.

Lionel Amron, Chana Yampolsky, and David Yampolsky v. Morgan Stanley Investment Advisors Inc. And Morgan Stanley Distributors Inc.

464 F.3d 338 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 26, 2006

each is entitled to a retirement package from Morgan Stanley; and each sits on other corporate, civic, and charitable boards. … Krantz v. Prudential Invs. Fund Mgmt. LLC, 305 F.3d 140, 143 (3d Cir.2002).

Casey v. Seas Shipping Co., Inc

178 F.2d 360 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 12, 1949

Algic, was injured while attempting to board the ship when it was moored at an open dock at Durban, South Africa. … United States v. River Rouge Co., 269 U.S. 411, 421 , 46 S.Ct. 144 , 70 L.Ed. 339 ; Utah Power & Light Co. v. Woody, 10 Cir., 62 F.2d 613 ; Cohen v. Evening Star Newspaper Co., 72 App.D.C. 258 , 113 F.2d 523 . Affirmed.

United States v. City of Yonkers

856 F.2d 444 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 26, 1988

United States v. Yonkers Board of Education, 624 F.Supp. 1276 -1553 (S.D.N.Y.1985). … United States v. Yonkers Board of Education, 635 F.Supp. 1538 (S.D.N.Y.1986). .

James C. Schum v. South Buffalo Railway Co.

496 F.2d 328 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 25, 1974

Similarly, in Nemitz v. … See also De Arroyo v.

Totalplan Corp. of America v. Colborne

14 F.3d 824 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 2, 1994

In Sampson v. … Evans v.

Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,845 Martin Fox v. Reich & Tang, Inc. And Daily Income Fund, Inc.

692 F.2d 250 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 26, 1982

Burks v. Lasker, supra, 441 U.S. at 483-86 , 99 S.Ct. at 1839-1841 . “[W]hen Congress ... intended] to prevent board action from cutting off derivative suits, it said so expressly. … court should defer to the board’s decision not to pursue the action.”

Johnson v. Glick

481 F.2d 1028 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 29, 1973

The first case in the line is Brown v. Brown, 368 F.2d 992 (9 Cir. 1966), where, however, the complaint alleged other deprivations of civil rights. 2 This was followed by Dodd v. … Although this was a case of beating pure and simple, the court, over Judge Chambers' dissent held it to be "indistinguishable from Brown v. Brown," supra. To the same effect is Allison v.

White v. Wellington

627 F.2d 582 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 2, 1980

See also, Buffalo Teachers Association v. Board of Education, 477 F.Supp. 691, 693-94 (W.D.N.Y.1979). … Similarly, the case of Chance v. Board of Examiners, 561 F.2d 1079 (2d Cir. 1977), relied on in the dissent, fails to compel a deferral to state court jurisdiction here.

Retirement Plan of the Unite Here National Retirement Fund v. Kombassan Holding A.S.

629 F.3d 282 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 21, 2010

Fund v. Express Servs., Inc., 426 F.3d 640, 647 (2d Cir. 2005); see also Lowen v. … Saks Int’l, Inc. v. M/V Exp. Champion, 817 F.2d 1011, 1013 (2d Cir. 1987).

Meyer v. Oppenheimer Management Corp.

764 F.2d 76 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 30, 1985

That suit, Meyer v. … The district court relied principally on the approval of the two fees by the Fund’s board of directors, despite the suggestion in Burks v.

O'Connor v. Pierson

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 3, 2009

07-1758-cv O'Connor v. … O'Connor v.

Cinerama, Inc., a New York Corporation v. Sweet Music, S.A., a Swiss Corporation, and Union Bank of Switzerland, a Swiss Corporation

482 F.2d 66 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 14, 1973

Against all this the Bank opposes Brown Shoe Co. v. … In short, the jurisdictional decision in Brown Shoe is not a datum for reasoning in different contexts.

Keen v. Overseas Tankship Corp.

194 F.2d 515 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 5, 1952

The King’s Bench so held in 1811, Tait v. Levi, 14 East 481 (see also Walker v. Maitland, 5 B. & Aid. 172); the Supreme Court assumed as much in 1828, McLanahan v. … In Spellman v.