Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
6.07s
546 F.2d 10 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 2, 1976
As noted, the Army Board’s decision was on June 4, 1976. When our earlier cases, e. g., United States ex rel. Schonbrun v. Commanding Officer, 403 F.2d 371 (2d Cir. 1968), and Roth v. … See Feliciano v. Laird, 426 F.2d 424, 427 (2d Cir. 1970). 8 In Smith v.
Cited 20 timesPublished989 F.2d 603 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 24, 1993
In United States v. Brown, 381 U.S. 437 , 85 S.Ct. 1707 , 14 L.Ed.2d 484 (1965), the Court invalidated a statute denying labor union employment to most members of the Communist Party. … The Ninth Circuit held that the Board’s decision was not supported by substantial evidence. See McMullen v. INS, 658 F.2d 1312 (9th Cir.1981).
Cited 7 timesPublished558 F.3d 137 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 3, 2009
Council v. … At any time beginning on the 121st day after an appellant files a VEOA appeal with the Board, if a judicially reviewable Board decision on the appeal has not been issued, the appellant may elect to terminate the Board proceeding
Cited 251 timesPublished633 F. App'x 15 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 3, 2016
Miller v. Wolpoff & Abramson, LLP, 321 F.3d 292, 300 (2d Cir.2003). … Robinson v. Concentra Health Servs., Inc., 781 F.3d 42, 44 (2d Cir.2015) (quoting Brown v. Eli Lilly & Co., 654 F.3d 347, 358 (2d Cir.2011)).
Cited 1 timesPublishedUnited States ex rel. Marshall v. Snyder
160 F.2d 351 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 25, 1947
Marshall v. Webster, 268 App.Div. 844 , 50 N.Y.S.2d 520 , 521: “Appeal, in part, from an order of the Supreme Court, Clinton County, made - on *352 or about March 16, 1944. … Carruthers v. Reed, 8 Cir., 102 F.2d 933 .
Cited 6 timesPublished690 F.2d 318 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 29, 1982
P 13,804 HILTON INTERNATIONAL COMPANY d/b/a Caribe Hilton Hotel, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. … III 16 On review, the Board's findings are entitled to deference if supported by substantial evidence in the record taken as a whole, Universal Camera Corp. v.
Cited 3 timesPublished703 F.2d 54 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 28, 1983
At Washington, D.C., Robert Sweadner boarded the train, after having purchased a ticket but without an assigned seat. Sweadner asked Harry Baughn, the Amtrak conductor, whether he could board without a reservation. … Putnam v. Broadway & Seventh Avenue R. Co., 55 N.Y. 108, 113, 116-117 (1875). Ostensibly peaceable intoxication does not put a carrier on notice of the possibility of physical danger to other passengers.
Cited 2 timesPublishedSouthside Fair Housing Committee v. City of New York
928 F.2d 1336 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 26, 1991
See also Tilton v. Richardson, 403 U.S. 672, 677 (1971); see generally Everson v. Board of Educ., 330 U.S. 1, 8-16 (1947) (providing history and general background of first amendment). … Zorach v.
Cited 12 timesPublished33 F.3d 134 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 17, 1994
Castellano v. Board of Trustees, et al., 937 F.2d 752 , 758 (2d Cir.1991). … Compare Blank v. Kirwan, [ 39 Cal.3d 311 , 216 Cal. Rptr. 718, 729-30 ] 703 P.2d 58, 70 (Cal. 1985) (relationship between potential club owner and city licensing board).
Cited 169 timesPublished224 F.2d 861 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 16, 1955
The Board, in its opinion, added that Klein, “with some justice, we feel, contends that he, therefore, had no reason to be concerned as to these spreads.” Well it might. … Johnson & Co. v.
Cited 7 timesPublished804 F.2d 239 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 3, 1986
Involved in the arrests were a maroon car, a blue van, and a brown car driven by one of the men Buck had seen in the brown car in the Friendly’s parking lot. … United States v. Davis, 767 F.2d 1025, 1040 (2d Cir.1985); United States v. Martino, 759 F.2d 998, 1002 (2d Cir.1985). The government was not required to exclude every possibility but that of guilt, see Holland v.
Cited 54 timesPublished301 F.2d 420 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 10, 1962
As stated in Passaic Falls Throwing Co. v. … Stewart & Co. v. Rivara, 274 U.S. 614 , 47 S.Ct. 718 , 71 L.Ed. 1234 (1927), affirming Rivara v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedKimes v. United States the William M. Meredith
207 F.2d 60 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 11, 1953
Jacobson v. Panama R. Co., 2 Cir., 266 F. 344 ; The Olockson, 5 Cir., 281 F. 690 ; United States v. Aslaksen, 6 Cir., 281 F. 444 ; Rees v. United States, D.C.N.D.Cal., 134 F. 146 ; Burke v. … Jacobson v. Panama R. Co., supra, 2 Cir., 266 F. 344 ; The Olockson, supra, 5 Cir., 281 F. 690 ; Waterman S. S. Corp. v.
Cited 11 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 3, 2012
Collins v. … New York Executive Law § 259(i) allows the Parole Board to weigh factors militating for and against parole as it sees fit. But the Parole Board must weigh all statutory factors. See King v. New York State Div.
Cited 0 timesPublished14 F.3d 751 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 18, 1994
Q: Did you ever have any information about [Koslosky, Greenip, Brown and Gagliola] growing marijuana in the Park? A: Definitely not. Count V concerned her prior criminal history: Q: Have you ever been arrested? A: No. … United States v. Lighte, 782 F.2d at 373-74 . She claims the statement was true because no one ever told her that Koslosky, Greenip, Brown, and Gag-liola were smoking marijuana in the Park.
Cited 19 timesPublished197 F.3d 41 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 16, 1999
Wessmann v. … Freeman v. Pitts, 503 U.S. 467, 496 , 112 S. Ct. 1430, 1448 , 118 L. Ed. 2d 108 (1992) (emphasis added); see also Board of Educ. v. Dowell, 498 U.S. 237, 246 , 111 S. Ct. 630, 636 , 112 L.
Cited 1 timesPublishedIn re Bankshares Corp. of the United States
50 F.2d 94 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 1, 1931
He maintains that the board of directors had no authority to meet and give consent to the adjudication and refers us to the following authorities: Cavagnaro v. Indian Tire & Rubber Co., 90 N. J. … Bank of Patterson v. New York Silk Mfg. Co., 11 F. 532 (C. C. N. J.); Barthen v. Lodi Corporations, 94 N. J. Eq. 177, 119 A. 189 .
Cited 11 timesPublishedKane v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
100 F.2d 382 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 5, 1938
Foss v. Commissioner, 75 F.2d 326, 328 . We are not persuaded that the taxpayer was engaged directly or indirectly in carrying on a business. City Bank Farmers’ Trust Co. v. … Lloyd v. Commissioner, 7 Cir., 55 F.2d 842 .
Cited 13 timesPublishedAdler v. Education Department of State of New York
760 F.2d 454 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 25, 1985
Moreover, the district court said that in Board of Education v. … See also Flavin v. Connecticut State Board of Education, 553 F.Supp. 827, 831 (D.Conn.1982).
Cited 30 timesPublishedTwinboro Corp. v. Commissioner
149 F.2d 574 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 7, 1945
In Washington Railway & Electric Co. v. … We may of course have been wrong and the Board right, but the attempted distinction is untenable. In Bandes v.
Cited 6 timesPublished
Ask Donna