Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
3.19s
64 F.2d 107 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 3, 1933
Co. v. Commissioner (C. C. A.) 50 F.(2d) 394 . Our decision was entered June 8, 1931, and our mandate was issued June 24, 1931. … If the question was before us and the deficiency for 1921, as redetermined by the Board, was in any respect affected by our mandate, the best position the Commissioner can take is that the Board made one decision and within
Cited 1 timesPublished166 F.3d 45 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 7, 1999
Kurlan v. Callaway, 510 F.2d 274, 280 (2d Cir.1974); see also Smith, 406 F.2d at 145 ; Fox v. Brown, 402 F.2d 837, 840 (2d Cir.1968); cf. … See Patsy v. Board of Regents, 457 U.S. 496, 516 , 102 S.Ct. 2557 , 73 L.Ed.2d 172 (1982).
Cited 185 timesPublishedNutritional Health Alliance v. Food & Drug Administration
318 F.3d 92 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 21, 2003
See Brown & Williamson, 529 U.S. at 132-33 , 120 S.Ct. 1291 ; Oncale v. … v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedFreedman v. Value Health, Inc.
34 F. App'x 408 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 1, 2002
Herman & MacLean v. Huddleston, 459 U.S. 375, 382 , 103 S.Ct. 683 , 74 L.Ed.2d 548 (1983); see also Wilson v. Saintine Exploration and Drilling Corp., 872 F.2d 1124, 1126 (2d Cir.1989). … Plaintiffs first contend that the June 27, 1995, prospectus was materially misleading because the Value Health Board of Directors stated that the merger was in the “best interests” of Value Health even though the board did
Cited 3 timesPublishedUnited States v. Adrian Cuevas
510 F.2d 848 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 10, 1975
Indeed, relying on Brown v. United States, 245 F.2d 549 (8th Cir. 1957), defense trial counsel moved for a judgment of acquittal. … In Brown information elicited referred only to offenses in Missouri, not Nebraska, the site of the grand jury. Nor is it like United States v.
Cited 16 timesPublishedRobinson v. Concentra Health Services, Inc.
781 F.3d 42 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 24, 2015
Brown v. … Brown, 654 F.3d at 358 .
Cited 561 timesPublishedElectric Boat Corp. v. DeMartino
495 F.3d 14 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 1, 2007
06-2465-ag Electric Boat v. … See Lawson v.
Cited 12 timesPublished782 F.2d 1094 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 22, 1986
See, e.g., Grand Light & Supply Co., Inc. v. Honeywell, Inc., 771 F.2d 672, 680-81 (2d Cir. 1985); Browning Debenture Holders’ Committee v. DASA Corp., 560 F.2d 1078, 1086 (2d Cir.1977). C. … See, e.g., Ezell v. Mobil Housing Board, 709 F.2d 1376 , 1381 (11th Cir.1983). . But see, Hodge v. McLean Trucking Co., 607 F.2d 1118 (5th Cir.1979); Inda v.
Cited 133 timesPublishedCheney Bros. v. Doris Silk Corporation
35 F.2d 279 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 21, 1929
Board of Trade v. Christie, 198 U. S. 236 , 25 S. Ct. 637 , 49 L. … They are like Board of Trade v. Christie.
Cited 63 timesPublishedCommissioner of Internal Revenue v. Tyng
106 F.2d 55 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 3, 1939
We think the Board was right in holding that the transaction was a reorganization rather than a sale. In Cortland Specialty Co. v. … In Helvering v.
Cited 9 timesPublished957 F.3d 122 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 20, 2020
Brown, 937 F.2d 32. See Br. of Appellant at 18, 20. We disagree. … Brown, 937 F.2d at 37.
Cited 9 timesPublished492 F.2d 998 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 21, 1974
A third may be furnished by the portion of Greene County Planning Board v. … Our recent decision in Greene County Planning Board v. FPC (Greene County II), 490 F.2d 256 , *1002 258 (2 Cir. 1973), implies the contrary.
Cited 42 timesPublished823 F.2d 35 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 13, 1987
As the Supreme Court stated in Calhoon v. … In Local 82, Furniture Moving Drivers v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedCommissioner of Internal Revenue v. Le Gierse
110 F.2d 734 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 25, 1940
This the Board set aside, following its prior decision in Estate of Anna M. Keller v. Comm. of Int. Rev., 39 B.T.A. 1047 . For a discussion of the Keller decision see 49 Yale L.J. 946 . … The correctness of the Board’s action is the question presented to the court. The facts as found by the Board are briefly as follows: On December 6, 1935 Mrs.
Reversed on other grounds by Helvering v. Le Gierse, 312 U.S. 531 (1941)Cited 11 timesPublished329 F.2d 32 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 14, 1964
See Railroad Yardmasters v. Pennsylvania R. R., 224 F.2d 226 (3 Cir. 1955); Chicago, R. I. & P. R. R. v. … B. v. Reed & Prince Mfg. Co., 205 F.2d 131, 136 (1 Cir.), cert. denied, 346 U.S. 887 , 74 S.Ct. 139 , 98 L.Ed. 391 (1953); cf. Switchmen’s Union of North America v. Southern Pac.
Disagreed with by International Association of MacHinists & Aerospace Workers, Afl-Cio (Iam), Iam District Lodge 143 v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., 843 F.2d 1119 (1988)Cited 49 timesPublished545 F.3d 114 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 2, 2008
See Brown v. Cara, 420 F.3d 148, 154 (2d Cir.2005); Adjustrite, 145 F.3d at 549 . We find no such reservation here. The April 9 agreement is six pages long and titled a “letter agreement.” … Brown v. Cara, 420 F.3d 148, 154 (2d Cir.2005).
Cited 110 timesPublished310 F.2d 169 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 5, 1962
Co. v. … Brown, Personal Property (2d ed. 1955), 390; The Winkfield, L. R. [1902] page 42. Cf. Robins Dry Dock & Repair Co. v. Flint, 275 U.S. 303 , 48 S.Ct. 134 , 72 L.Ed. 290 (1927).
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States v. New York City Transit Authority
97 F.3d 672 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 8, 1996
The Transit Authority, relying on Tawwab v. … The Transit Authority also relies on Armstrong v.
Cited 46 timesPublishedHenry Gillen's Sons Lighterage, Inc. v. Fernald
294 F. 520 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 19, 1923
A supply of boards, and a saw, ax, hammer, and nails to repair broken boards, was kept on hand on the lighter, and it was the duty of the chief deckhand, Thompson, to make these repairs. … Roebling’s Sons Co. of New York v. Erickson (C. C.
Cited 7 timesPublished639 F. App'x 44 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 27, 2016
Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 , 127 S.Ct. 1955 , 167 L.Ed.2d 929 (2007); see also Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 , 129 S.Ct. 1937 , 173 L.Ed.2d 868 (2009). … Because conditions attached to a variance are entrusted to th'e planning board’s discretion, see Village of Mamaroneck, N.Y., Code § 186-6(A)(5), the Appellants had no protected interest in a conditions-free variance.
Cited 36 timesPublished
Ask Donna