Case law

Ex parte Ver Pault

86 F.2d 113 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 2, 1936

Bissell v. Bissell, 55 Barb. (N.Y.) 325; Imboden v. St. Louis Union Trust Co., 111 Mo.App. 220 , 86 S.W. 263 ; Farley v. Farley, 94 Ala. 501 , 10 So. 646 , 33 Am.St.Rep. 141 . … Tod v. Waldman, 266 U.S. 113 , 45 S.Ct. 85 , 69 L. Ed. 195 ; United States ex rel. Zaffarano v. Corsi, supra; United States ex rel. Friedman v. Tod, 296 F. 888 (C.C.A.2).

Grune v. Rodriguez

176 F.3d 27 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 26, 1999

See Siegert v. … See Doe v.

Truitt v. Salisbury Bank and Trust Co.

52 F.4th 80 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 27, 2022

McCavitt v. Swiss Reinsurance Am. Corp., 89 F. … See Reeves v.

Edwards v. Wabash Ry. Co.

264 F. 610 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 18, 1920

United States v. Hill, 120 U. S. 169, 182 [7 Sup. Ct. 510, 30 L. Ed. 627 ]; United States v. Philbick, 120 U. S. 52, 59 [7 Sup. Ct. 413, 30 L. Ed. 559 ]; Brown v. United States, 113 U. S. 568, 571 [5 Sup. Ct. 648, 28 L. … Bank v. Shire, 88 App. Div. 401 , 84 N. Y. Supp. 810 , affirmed 179 N. Y. 587 , 72 N. E. 1141 . And in American Pig Iron Storage Co. v. State Board of Assessors, 56 N. J.

Ring v. Spina

148 F.2d 647 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 19, 1945

United States, 282 U.S. 30 , 51 S.Ct. 42 , 75 L.Ed. 145 ; Fox Film Corp. v. Muller, 296 U.S. 207 , 56 S.Ct. 183 , 80 L.Ed. 158 ; Youngclaus v. Omaha Film Board of Trade, D.C. Neb., 60 F.2d 538, 540 . … Thomas v. City of Richmond, 79 U.S. 349 , 12 Wall. 349 , 20 L.Ed. 453 ; City of Parkersburg v. Brown, 106 U.S. 487, 503 , 1 S.Ct. 442 , 27 L.Ed. 238 ; Logan County Nat. Bank v.

Montesa v. Schwartz

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 12, 2016

v.  … See Lemon v. 

United States v. Garcia

164 F. App'x 176 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 1, 2006

See United States v. Brown, 402 F.3d 133, 137 (2d Cir.2005). *178 In consideration of the record and the nature of the crime of conviction, we conclude that it was not an abuse of discretion, see United States v. … See Brown, 402 F.3d at 137-38 .

United States v. Alexander Rogers

209 F.3d 139 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 10, 2000

Citing Cuyler v. … See Wood v. Georgia, 450 U.S. 261, 271 , 101 S.Ct. 1097 , 67 L.Ed.2d 220 (1981) (citing Cuyler v. Sullivan, 446 U.S. 335 , 100 S.Ct. 1708 , 64 L.Ed.2d 333 (1980) and Holloway v.

Planet Line, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

89 F.2d 16 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 5, 1937

Aluminum Castings Co. v. Rout-zahn, supra. … See Miller & Vidor Lumber Co. v. Commissioner (C.C.A.) 39 F.(2d) 890 .

Stanton v. Astrue

370 F. App'x 231 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 24, 2010

Poupore v. … See Halloran v.

Atlantic Transport Co. v. Coneys

82 F. 177 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 26, 1897

The cases of Casement v. Brown, 148 U. S. 615 , 13 Sup. Ct. 672, and Railroad Co. v. … In Casement v. Brown, supra, the court, by Mr. Justice Brewer, said: “The will of the companies [the owners] was represented only in the result of the work, and not in the means by- which it was accomplished.

Stevenson v. Holstein-Friesian Ass'n of America

30 F.2d 625 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 4, 1929

See Richards v. Morison, 229 Mass. 458 , 118 N. E. 868 ; Lewis v. Wilson, 121 N. Y. 284 , 24 N. E. 474 ; Haebler v. N. Y. Produce Exchange, 149 N. Y. 434 , 44 N. E. 87 ; Pitcher v. Board of Trade, 121 Ill. 412 , 13 N. … It has been definitely decided that meetings of the association and its board of directors may legally be held without the state of New York. Matter of George v. Holstein-Friesian Ass’n, supra.

Perez v. Ortiz

849 F.2d 793 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 27, 1988

Not only were they ordered both sua sponte and without notice to plaintiffs, but they were also imposed across-the-board by this particular district judge on five separate civil rights cases. … Brandon v.

Cheng Kai Fu v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

386 F.2d 750 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 16, 1967

As Judge Mansfield said in Lam Leung Kam v. Esperdy, “If such were the law, all deportations could be permanently frustrated by the mere filing of successive petitions to reopen.” Lam Leung Kam v. … Lam Leung Kam v. Esperdy, 274 F.Supp. 485 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 7, 1967) (Mansfield, J.); Chan Chung Yin v. Esperdy, 276 F.Supp. 882 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 30, 1967) (Wyatt, J.); Kwong Chau v. Esperdy, 276 F.Supp. 897 (S.D.N.Y.

International Society For Krishna Consciousness, Inc. v. J. Roger Barber

650 F.2d 430 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 3, 1981

Brown, 366 U.S. 599 , 81 S.Ct. 1144 , 6 L.Ed.2d 563 (1961), or upon Mormons to practice polygamy, United States v. … Brown, supra (Sunday closing law does not prevent Orthodox Jew from observing the Sabbath); Corporation of Presiding Bishop v.

Mexican Radio Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 15, 2019

18-1509 (L) Mexican Radio Corporation v. … The Company’s bare factual assertions to the contrary fail to refute the Board’s finding of pretext. V.

Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. William C. Dunn and Delta Consultants, Inc., Delta Options, Ltd. And Nopkine Co., Ltd.

58 F.3d 50 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 23, 1995

We addressed this question in Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. American Board of Trade, 803 F.2d 1242 (2d Cir.1986), and interpreted “transactions in foreign currency” to exclude options. … We acknowledge that our interpretation of the phrase “transactions in foreign currency” in American Board of Trade conflicts with that of the Fourth Circuit in Salomon Forex, Inc. v.

Rock-Hill-Uris, Inc. v. McLeod

344 F.2d 697 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 20, 1965

. § 159 (b)(3), which bars the National Labor Relations Board from certifying any labor organization “as the representative of employees in a bargaining unit of guards if such organization admits to membership, or is affiliated … See Leedom v. Kyne, 358 U.S. 184 , 79 S.Ct. 180 , 3 L.Ed. 2d 210 (1958); Boire v. Greyhound Corp., 376 U.S. 473, 481 , 84 S.Ct 894 , 11 L.Ed. 2d 849 (1964); Local 130, I. U. E. W. v. McCulloch, 345 F.2d 90 (D.C.Cir.

Compagnie Generale Transatlantique v. American Tobacco Co.

31 F.2d 663 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 1, 1929

In Meeker v. L. V. R. Co., 236 U. S. 412 , 35 S. Ct. 328 , 59 L. Ed. 644 , Ann. … In ease of a violation, the person injured may make a complaint to the Shipping Board and ask for reparation, and after a hearing the board has the authority to make findings and an order directing such reparation, and the

Isiah M. Doolen v. Christine Wormuth

5 F.4th 125 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 20, 2021

Doolen v. … Jones v. N.Y.