Case law

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Local 638

565 F.2d 31 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 18, 1977

Albemarle Paper Co. v. Moody, 422 U.S. 405, 418 , 95 S.Ct. 2362 , 45 L.Ed.2d 280 (1975). … EEOC v. Local 14, 553 F.2d 251 , 254 (2d Cir. 1977). See also Hazelwood School District v. United States, — U.S. —, n. 17, 97 S.Ct. 2736 , 53 L.Ed.2d 768 (1977).

Guo Liang Chen v. Mukasey

255 F. App'x 584 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 29, 2007

Zhi Wei Pang v. … See Tu Lin v.

Solid 21, Inc. v. Breitling USA, Inc.

96 F.4th 265 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 14, 2024

Kelly-Brown v. Winfrey, 717 F.3d 295, 308 (2d Cir. 2013). … See Kelly-Brown v. Winfrey, 717 F.3d 295, 313 (2d Cir. 2013) (collecting cases).

John J. Barry, Marguerite v. Barry and James Gebhardt, on Their Own Behalf and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. City of New York New York City Board of Ethics Edward I. Koch, as Mayor of the City of New York and David N. Dinkins, as City Clerk, James Slevin, Mary Slevin, Brian Clinton, Joan Clinton, Dr. Stanley C. Fell, and Frank D'amico, on Their Own Behalf and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants v. City of New York New York City Board of Ethics Edward I. Koch, as Mayor of the City of New York Francis T.P. Plimpton, as Chairman of the Board of Ethics Powell Pierpoint and Barbara Scott Preiskel as Members of the Board of Ethics and David N. Dinkins as City Clerk, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees

712 F.2d 1554 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 22, 1983

BARRY, Marguerite V. Barry and James Gebhardt, on their own behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CITY OF NEW YORK; New York City Board of Ethics; Edward I. … Fell, and Frank D'Amico, on their own behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants, v. CITY OF NEW YORK; New York City Board of Ethics; Edward I.

United States v. Peter Matusewitch

481 F.2d 174 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 23, 1973

However the local board was not required to assume the task of eliciting the required information from a subject who refused to cooperate. … See United States v. Guzman, 478 F.2d 759, 762 (2d Cir. 1973). Judgment affirmed; remanded for reconsideration of the sentence.

United States v. Luke Hamilton Jones

444 F.2d 89 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 4, 1971

him time to contact his board. … United States v. Kee Ming Hsu, 424 F.2d 1286, 1291 (2d Cir. 1970); U. S. v. Birnbaum, 402 F.2d 24, 30 (2d Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 922 , 89 S.Ct. 1181 , 22 L.Ed.2d 455 (1969); 2 C.

In re A & S Electric Corp.

379 F.2d 211 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 22, 1967

See e. g., United States v. … The Joint Industry Board also relies on Sulmeyer v. Southern California Pipe Trades Trust Fund, 301 F.2d 768 (9 Cir. 1962), which granted a wage priority to contributions to a Vacation and Holiday Benefit Fund.

Robert Walczak and Karen Walczak v. Florida Union Free School District and Maureen Flaherty

142 F.3d 119 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 16, 1998

B. v. Milford Bd. of Educ., 103 F.3d at 1121 (citing Board of Educ. v. … See Board of Educ. v.

United States ex rel. Accardi v. Shaughnessy

219 F.2d 77 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 7, 1955

Hershey v. Blackesley, 2 Cir., 33 F. 922, 924 . . Crouch v. Hooper, 16 Beav. 182, 185. . Marsh v. Tyrrell, 4 Eng.Ecc. 33, 46. See also Vreeland v. Vreeland, 48 N.J.Eq. 56, 21 A. 627 , 630; Rogers v. … Kramme v. The New England, 14 Fed.Cas. pages 852, 853, No. 7,930. . Haworth v. Stark, 2 Cir., 88 F. 512, 514 . . Murray v. White, D.C., 9 F. 562, 564 ; The Gratitude v.

Schachter v. Whalen

581 F.2d 35 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 19, 1978

Health Law § 230 (10)(k) & (l) (McKinney Supp. 1977), which grants subpoena power to the Executive Secretary of the New York State Board for Professional Medical Conduct (Board). … Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co., 398 U.S. 144 , 90 S.Ct. 1598 , 26 L.Ed.2d 142 (1970). In Whalen v.

Helvering v. Gregory

69 F.2d 809 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 19, 1934

The Board therefore expunged the deficiency, and the Commissioner appealed. … S. v. Isham, 17 Wall. 496, 506 , 21 L. Ed. 728 ; Bullen v. Wisconsin, 240 U. S. 625, 639 , 36 S. Ct. 473 , 60 L. Ed. 830 .

United States v. Jerrold Howard Gottlieb

493 F.2d 987 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 18, 1974

Hardy v. United States, 118 U.S.App.D.C. 253 , 335 F.2d 288 (1964). … United States v. Salazar, 485 F.2d 1272, 1277 (2d Cir. 1973); United States v.

Jewett & Co. v. Commissioner

61 F.2d 471 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 17, 1932

The tax *472 payer attempted to prove this before the Board, but unsuccessfully, though one member dissented. … It was of course possible for the Board to discredit the witness altogether. He was highly interested, and might well stretch the facts in his favor, especially upon a matter of opinion. Uncasville Mfg. Co. v.

Scalisi v. Fund Asset Management, L.P.

380 F.3d 133 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 17, 2004

MLF has a nine-member board of directors. … See Brehm v.

Halstead v. New York City Transit Authority

78 F. App'x 750 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 22, 2003

The arbitration boards were established pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement between the Transit Authority and the plaintiffs union. Id. at 8. The District Court applied our decision in Collins v. … R.Civ.P. 56(c); Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 256 , 106 S.Ct. 2505 , 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986). We review the District Court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. Young v.

Village of Freeport v. Barrella

814 F.3d 594 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 16, 2016

Three  months  later,  the  mayor  recommended,  and  the  Board  confirmed,  Bermudez’s  promotion  to  assistant  chief.  … ,  who  is  black.80  Although Maguire initially suggested that Brown was so unqualified  that race must have played a role in his appointment, Maguire later  admitted that he was unaware of Brown’s qualifications.81  

John J. Cuneo v. Local No. 825, International Union Of Operating Engineers, Afl-Cio

300 F.2d 832 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 20, 1962

CUNEO, Regional Director of the Twenty-Second Region of the National Labor Relations Board, for and on Behalf of the NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. … Schauffler v. United Association of Journeymen, 218 F.2d 476, 480 (3 Cir. 1955); Shore v.

Rudenko v. Costello

286 F.3d 51 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 20, 2002

Brown, 251 A.D.2d 341 , 673 N.Y.S.2d 1012 (2d Dep’t), and the memorandum of law filed by the District Attorney. Brown v. Senkowski, CV-99-723 (E.D.N.Y. dated June 23, 1999, filed June 25, 1999). 2. … Allstate Insurance Co., 194 F.3d 357, 363 (2d Cir.1999); Philbrook v. Ansonia Board of Education, 925 F.2d 47, 53 (2d Cir.1991).

P. Ex Rel. Mr. and Mrs. P. v. Newington Bd. of Ed.

546 F.3d 111 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 9, 2008

See Poolaw v. … Roncker v.

Bagel Bakers Council of Greater New York, Bagel Box, Inc., Bagel Town, Inc., Benson Bagel Bakery, Inc., Culver Bagel Bakery, Inc., Far Rockaway Bagel Bakery, Inc., Golden Bagel Bakery, Inc., Island Park Nassau Bagel Bakery, Inc., Nelson Bagel Bakery, Inc., Neptune Brighton Bagels, Inc., Rubinstein Bagels, Inc., Rubinstein Bagels, Inc., Triboro Bagel Co. Inc., D & H Bagel Bakery, Inc., and Pop's Bagel Bakery, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. Flatlands Bagel Bakery, Inc., Laurelton Bagel Bakery, Golden Bagel Corp., Neptune Bagel Bakers, Inc., and Joseph Rubinstein, Morris Rubinstein, and Herman Reiter, D/B/A Rubinstein Bagels

555 F.2d 304 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 6, 1977

Inc., D & H Bagel Bakery, Inc., and Pop's Bagel Bakery, Inc., Petitioners, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. … The facts of the case are fully set out in a prior opinion of this Court, in which we enforced the National Labor Relations Board's ("Board") finding that the employers had illegally locked out their employees. NLRB v.