Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersca2

10,000+ results

5.32s

  • General Media Communications, Inc. v. Cohen

    131 F.3d 273 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 21, 1997

    " (the "Board"). … Sys., Inc. v. FCC, 512 U.S. 622, 641 , 114 S.Ct. 2445, 2458 , 129 L.Ed.2d 497 (1994); see also Board of Educ. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Papelino v. Albany College of Pharmacy of Union University

    633 F.3d 81 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 24, 2011

    The three students appealed the decision to the College Honor Code Appellate Board, but the Board declined to hear the appeal. … Wills v. Brown Univ., 184 F.3d 20, 25 (1st Cir.1999). Similarly, a Title IX hostile education environment claim is “governed by traditional Title VII ‘hostile environment’ jurisprudence.” Hayut, 352 F.3d at 744.

    Cited 223 timesPublished
  • Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co. v. Catskill Illuminating & Power Co.

    121 F. 831 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 25, 1903

    Brown and Page. … Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Company v. Saranac Lake Electric Light Company (C. C.) 108 Fed. 221, 222 . Clark Thread Company v. Willimantic Linen Company, 140 U. S. 481 , 11 Sup. Ct. 846, 35 L. Ed. 521 .

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Meredith D. Shattuck and Ulo Vahtra (Ibm), Movants-Appellees v. Helmut Hoegl and Giacomo Barchietto (Xerox)

    523 F.2d 509 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 16, 1975

    The Board then added somewhat cryptically: “It should be further noted in connection with the Shattuck et al. request for the production of witnesses that this Board has no authority to order or force a person to testify … The preliminary statements are then exchanged, and the matter returned to the Board of Patent Interferences for trial. The Board then establishes a time schedule within which the parties must present their cases.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Watts v. Vanderbilt

    45 F.2d 968 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 15, 1930

    Tr the allegations that the board of directora has not functioned for the past five years and that there is no existing board of directors be sufficient to excuse a demand upon the directors, it would but emphasize the necessity … In McClean v.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • AHW Investment Partnership v. Citigroup Inc.

    806 F.3d 695 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 25, 2015

    Roth v. … Albert v. Alex. Brown Mgmt. Servs., Inc., Nos. Civ. A. 762-N, 763-N, 2005 WL 2130607 , at *12 (Del.Ch. Aug. 26, 2005).

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • United States v. DiLapi

    600 F.2d 1027 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 12, 1979

    The Board appealed to this court, which, on January 9, 1979, entered an order dismissing the appeal and denying the Board’s application for mandamus. United States v. DiLapi, 529 F.2d 1209 (2d Cir. 1979). … As noted above, the Board, on January 9, 1979, appealed the district court’s denial of its motion to quash and also petitioned for *1033 mandamus. This court, United States v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Carroll-McCreary Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Rev.

    124 F.2d 303 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 30, 1941

    Co. v. Commissioner, 7 Cir., 47 F.2d 990 , certiorari denied 284 U.S. 618 , 52 S.Ct. 7 , 76 L.Ed. 527 ; Charleston & W. C. Ry. Co. v. Burnet, 60 App.D.C. 192 , 50 F.2d 342 ; Haden Co. v. … Maryland Casualty Co. v. United States, 251 U.S. 342 , 40 S.Ct. 155 , 64 L.Ed. 297 ; Burnet v. Sanford & Brooks Co., 282 U.S. 359 , 51 S.Ct. 150 , 75 L.Ed. 383 ; Helvering v. Am.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • George Hadges v. Yonkers Racing Corporation

    918 F.2d 1079 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 19, 1990

    See id. at 723 , 81 S.Ct. at 860-61 ; see also Moose Lodge No. 107 v. … See id.; see also Bier v. Fleming, 717 F.2d 308 (6th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1026 , 104 S.Ct. 1283 , 79 L.Ed.2d 686 (1984); Fulton v.

    Cited 41 timesPublished
  • Thompson v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

    115 F.2d 661 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 12, 1940

    , Welch v. … The Board’s determination that it became worthless in 1933 was, accordingly, made with clear supporting evidence and, because it was, is to be accepted. Darling v. Commissioner, 4 Cir., 49 F.2d 111, 113 ; Phillips v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Scm Corporation v. Federal Trade Commission

    565 F.2d 807 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 23, 1977

    Thus, citing North Carolina v. … In Protectoseal Co. v.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Miles v. Merrill Lynch & Co.

    471 F.3d 24 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 5, 2006

    In Coopers & Lybrand v. … More recently, in Amchem Products, Inc. v.

    Superseded by statute, as recognized in Attenborough v. Construction & General Building Laborers' Local 79Cited 269 timesPublished
  • United States v. Brennan

    650 F.3d 65 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 5, 2011

    See NYC Board V, 556 F.Supp.2d 202 . … NYC Board V, 556 F.Supp.2d at 209 .

    Cited 108 timesPublished
  • Edward M. Gilbert v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

    552 F.2d 478 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 4, 1977

    See James v. Commissioner, supra at 220, 81 S.Ct. 1052 ; Quinn v. Commissioner, 524 F.2d 617, 624-25 (7th Cir. 1975); Rev.Rul. 65-254, 1965 — 2 Cum.Bul. 50. As we held in Buff v. … Quinn v.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Kay Mfg. Corp.

    122 F.2d 443 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 5, 1941

    The Board allowed the credit on the authority of its own prior decision in Credit Alliance Corp. v. Commissioner, 42 B.T.A. 1020 . … In our opinion the Board and the Fourth Circuit rightly refused to do so in the Credit Alliance case. See, contra, Centennial Oil Co. v. Thomas, 5 Cir., 109 F.2d 359 , 361 with dissenting opinion by Judge Hutcheson.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • McCullough v. Wyandanch Union Free School District

    187 F.3d 272 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 30, 1999

    Pickering v. Board of Education of Township High School District 205, Will County, 391 U.S. 563, 568 , 88 S.Ct. 1731 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968). … Brandt v. Board of Coop. Educ. Servs., 845 F.2d 416 , 417 (2d Cir.1988).

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Murphy v. Travis

    36 F. App'x 679 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 10, 2002

    The New York Supreme Court invalidated the 1998 decision and ordered the Parole Board to conduct a new hearing. The Parole Board reaffirmed its decision in January 2000. … Gomez v. USAA Fed. Sav. Bank, 171 F.3d 794, 795 (2d Cir.1999).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Callahan v. County of Suffolk

    96 F.4th 362 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 19, 2024

    22-969-cv Callahan v. … Brown, District Judge, Presiding. 1 22-969-cv Callahan v.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Slee v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

    42 F.2d 184 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 16, 1930

    That the League is organized for charitable purposes seems to us clear, and the Board did not find otherwise. … Trinidad v. Sagrada Orden, 263 U. S. 578 , 44 S. Ct. 204 , 68 L. Ed. 458 .

    Cited 33 timesPublished
  • Bagel Bakers Council of Greater New York, Bagel Box, Inc., Bagel Town, Inc., Benson Bagel Bakery, Inc., Culver Bagel Bakery, Inc., Far Rockaway Bagel Bakery, Inc., Golden Bagel Bakery, Inc., Island Park Nassau Bagel Bakery, Inc., Nelson Bagel Bakery, Inc., Neptune Brighton Bagels, Inc., Rubinstein Bagels, Inc., Rubinstein Bagels, Inc., Triboro Bagel Co. Inc., D & H Bagel Bakery, Inc., and Pop's Bagel Bakery, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. Flatlands Bagel Bakery, Inc., Laurelton Bagel Bakery, Golden Bagel Corp., Neptune Bagel Bakers, Inc., and Joseph Rubinstein, Morris Rubinstein, and Herman Reiter, D/B/A Rubinstein Bagels

    555 F.2d 304 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 6, 1977

    Inc., D & H Bagel Bakery, Inc., and Pop's Bagel Bakery, Inc., Petitioners, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. … The facts of the case are fully set out in a prior opinion of this Court, in which we enforced the National Labor Relations Board's ("Board") finding that the employers had illegally locked out their employees. NLRB v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.