Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersca2

10,000+ results

3.06s

  • LeBlanc-Sternberg v. Fletcher

    143 F.3d 765 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 13, 1998

    Vertullo became a member of the ACA board following the resignations of several board members who opposed ACA’s discriminatory agenda. … In AFSCME v.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • DLC Management Corp. v. Town of Hyde Park

    179 F.3d 63 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 6, 1999

    PER CURIAM The Appellees-Cross-Appellants, the Town of Hyde Park and the Planning Board of Hyde Park (collectively the *64 “Town”), filed a motion for a bill of costs related to the appeal of the district court’s decision … DLC Management Corp. v. Town of Hyde Park, 163 F.3d 124 (2d Cir.1998).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Peña Garcia v. Department of Labor

    Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 5, 2026

    23-8066 Peña Garcia v. … Indeed, in Gonzales v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Yan Chen v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General, 1

    417 F.3d 268 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 2, 2005

    the case to the Board for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. … In Palavra v. INS, the Eighth Circuit found that “the Board did not merely fail to discuss [the petitioner’s] affidavit.

    Cited 2,728 timesPublished
  • Nelson v. Nordlinger

    67 F. 356 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 22, 1895

    The libelants shipped on board the British ship Timor, an iron steamship, 325 feet in length, at Fiume, Austria, 3,700 sacks of beans, for safe transportation to New York, damage from vetmin excepted. … Clark v. Barnwell, 12 How. 272 ; Transportation Co. v. Downer, 11 Wall. 129 . The libel averred that the negligence consisted in not fumigating the vessel for her voyage.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • United States v. Cecil Robinson

    560 F.2d 507 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 28, 1977

    Second, the evidence was of minimal relevance or materiality on the issue of possible access to Brown’s automobile since there was no evidence that Simon knew that Brown owned a car, much less the getaway car. … “Simon would also testify that he saw Brown from a distance at Harlem Hospital on a subsequent occasion.”

    Cited 224 timesPublished
  • Nucifora v. Glass

    36 F. App'x 472 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 13, 2002

    See Nucifora v. Bridgeport Bd. of Educ., 188 F.Supp.2d 197 (D.Conn.2001). … See Colwell v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • A/s Atlantica, M/v Hoegh Traveller v. Moran Towing & Transportation Co., Inc., Tug Alice A. Moran, Inc., and Tug Claire A. Moran, in Rem

    498 F.2d 158 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 4, 1974

    Sun Oil Co. v. … Co. v. Grant Bros. Co., 228 U.S. 177, 188 , 33 S.Ct. 474, 478 , 57 L.Ed. 787 (1913) Transpacific Carriers Corp. v. Tug Ellen F.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Salvatore and Hilda Laurenzano v. Alvin H. Einbender, Defendants-Respondents, and Retail Centers of the Americas, Inc.

    448 F.2d 1 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 3, 1971

    National’s plans for the money received from the G.E.S. sale, however, cannot reasonably be said to meet the test of materiality employed in this circuit, as stated in General Time Corp. v. … Plaintiffs’ third claim of material misrepresentation concerns the participation of Einbender at the Bargain Town Board meeting of November 11, 1964, at which time the Board approved the purchase of G.E.S.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • United States v. Hoeninghaus & Curtiss

    137 F. 478 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 24, 1905

    In Seeberger v. Hardy, 150 U. S. 420 , 14 Sup. Ct. 170, 37 L. … The court below based its opinion upon the decision in Seeberger v. Hardy. We fully concur in the opinion, and deem it unnecessary to add anything to it.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • United States v. Norton

    179 F.2d 527 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 19, 1950

    See Warren v. United States, 10 Cir., 177 F.2d 596 . 4 . “§ 613.16 Recalcitrants. … Connally v. General Construction Co., 269 U.S. 385, 391 , 46 S.Ct. 126 , 70 L.Ed. 322 ; Kraus & Bros. v. United States, 327 U.S. 614, 621 , 66 S.Ct. 705 , 90 L.Ed. 894 . 6 . Cf. Lowenburg v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Gang Zhang v. Mukasey

    262 F. App'x 311 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 23, 2008

    Diallo v. INS, 232 F.3d 279, 285-86 (2d Cir.2000). … See Xiao Ji Chen v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice, 471 F.3d 315, 335 (2d Cir.2006); Cao He Lin v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice, 428 F.3d 391, 395 (2d Cir.2005).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Vumi v. Gonzales

    502 F.3d 150 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 31, 2007

    The Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA” or “the Board”) affirmed this determination on the same basis. Petitioner subsequently sought our review of the BIA’s decision. … Osorio v. INS, 18 F.3d 1017, 1028 (2d Cir.1994).

    Cited 63 timesPublished
  • Zheng Fen Ou v. Holder

    322 F. App'x 60 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 15, 2009

    See Yueqing Zhang v. Gonzales, 426 F.3d 540 , 545 n. 7 (2d Cir.2005). … See Shi Liang Lin v. U.S.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lillian Mondshein, as Administratrix of the Estate of Benjamin Mondshein, and Lillian Mondshein v. United States

    469 F.2d 1394 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 8, 1973

    469 F.2d 1394 73-1 USTC P 9179 Lillian MONDSHEIN, as Administratrix of the Estate of Benjamin Mondshein, and Lillian Mondshein, Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. No. 201, Docket 72-1125. … Brown, Atty., Tax Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C. (Fred B. Ugast, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., Meyer Rothwacks, Richard W. Perkins, Attys., Tax Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., Robert Morse, U. S.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • United States v. Frank Crisona, Anthony Delyra, John Delyra, and Frank Lloyd Parks

    416 F.2d 107 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 25, 1969

    Earle Brown, the owner of Sunrise Mountain, a development corporation which was in Chapter XI reorganization; Brown was seeking a $3,000,000 loan for a real estate project in Las Vegas. … United States v. Dibrizzi, 393 F.2d 642, 646 (2d Cir. 1968); see United States v. Evanchik, supra, 413 F.2d at 954 ; United States v.

    Cited 79 timesPublished
  • Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Morris

    90 F.2d 962 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 14, 1937

    Speaking first a§ to the grievance of the taxpayer based on the Board’s inclusion of the ordinary trust income, it is necessary to state that one of these New York trusts was construed in Morris v. Morris, 272 N. … As we cannot find in the plain language of the law any justification for' taxing these capital gains to the settlor instead of to the trustees, we affirm the decision of the Board on this point. Sawtell v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Sanders v. Air Line Pilots Association, International

    473 F.2d 244 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 4, 1972

    Both ALPA and Airlift refused, contending that the merger had extinguished the Joint Grievance Board and had established in its place the System Board of Adjustment. … See, e.g., Stark v. New York Stock Exchange, 466 F.2d 743 , 744 (2 Cir.1972); Checker Motors Corp. v.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Commissioner of Internal Rev. v. Schmoll Fils Associated

    110 F.2d 611 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 18, 1940

    Jewel Tea Co. v. United States, 2 Cir., 90 F.2d 451 , 112 A.L.R. 182 . In Commissioner v. O. P. P. … In Kentucky River Coal Corporation v.

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Lancashire Shipping Co. v. Elting

    70 F.2d 699 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 30, 1934

    United States v. Winchester Co., supra. … Oklahoma v. Texas, 268 U. S. 252 , 45 S. Ct. 497 , 69 L. Ed. 937 ; Brant v. Virginia Coal & Iron Co., 93 U. S. 326 , 23 L. Ed. 927 ; Commercial Investment Trust v. Bay City Bank, 62 F.(2d) 735 (C. C. A. 6).

    Cited 8 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.