Case law

Regals Realty Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

127 F.2d 931 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 8, 1942

The Board had before it other evidence in conflict with taxpayer’s assertion that the property was held for investment. … The Board’s finding as to intention is not “a conclusion of law,” as in Midwood Associates, Inc., v. Commissioner, 2 Cir., 115 F.2d 871, 872 . Nor is this a case like Blackmer v.

Westchester Lodge 2186 v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.

329 F.2d 748 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 1, 1964

See Rutland Railway Corp. v. … If a minor dispute is not pending before the Adjustment Board, the District Court has no power to grant injunctive relief. Manion v. Kansas City Terminal Ry.

Theodore Kavowras v. The New York Times Co. And Newspaper & Mail Deliverers' Union

328 F.3d 50 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 1, 2003

See Demchik v. Gen. … Local Lodge No. 1424 v.

Garnett v. Undercover Officer C0039

838 F.3d 265 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 30, 2016

Cintron, and Roper—“left Quincy Brown’s house and headed to Lexington Avenue together.” … See Uzoukwu v. City of New.

Van Siclen v. Bush

78 F.2d 662 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 15, 1935

Wilkins v. M. Ascher Silk Corporation, 207 App. Div. 168 , 201 N. Y. S. 739, affirmed *664 237 N. Y. 574 , 143 N. E. 748 ; People v. Central Fish Co., 117 App. Div. 77 , 101 N. Y. S. 1108. •Section 77B, subsec. … , for the board of directors is the representative of the stockholders.

United States v. Ronald Ames Mayersohn

413 F.2d 641 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 23, 1969

The local board received the fraudulent Form DD 44 on October 21. … Costello v. United States, 350 U.S. 359 , 76 S.Ct. 406 , 100 L.Ed. 397 (1956). Moreover, the admonition of United States v.

Carrier Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board, Local Union No. 5895, United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio, Interveners

332 F.2d 563 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 25, 1964

332 F.2d 563 CARRIER CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. Local Union No. 5895, United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO, et al., Interveners. Docket No. 27079. … PER CURIAM. 1 This action was remanded to us by the Supreme Court of the United States pursuant to the opinion and judgment of the Court in United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO v.

Schonfeld v. Penza

477 F.2d 899 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 23, 1973

In Calhoon v. … Robins v.

Fusco v. Connecticut

815 F.2d 201 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 26, 1987

Mennonite Board of Missions v. Adams, 462 U.S. 791 , 103 S.Ct. 2706 , 77 L.Ed.2d 180 (1983), on which plaintiffs place reliance, is distinguishable. … See Bridgeport Bowl-O-Rama, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 195 Conn. 276 , 280 & n. 5, 487 A.2d 559 (1985). Therefore, there is a legitimate question whether failure of Conn.

In the Matter of the New York Stock Exchange Arbitration Between, Fahnestock & Co., Inc., Cross-Appellee v. Joseph J. Waltman, Cross-Appellant

935 F.2d 512 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 10, 1991

Sciences v. Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Jr. Univ., 489 U.S. 468, 477 , 109 S.Ct. 1248, 1254 , 103 L.Ed.2d 488 (1989). … Browning-Ferris Indus. v. Kelco Disposal, Inc., 492 U.S. 257, 278 , 109 S.Ct. 2909, 2922 , 106 L.Ed.2d 219 (1989).

John Mikus v. United States

433 F.2d 719 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 6, 1970

The robber with the accent had a brown paper grocery bag with a red “A & P” label on it, into which he instructed Mrs. McMahon to put the money entrusted to her. … As to the wife of the bank board chairman, in particular, we are cited to Sims v.

Nambiar v. the Central Orthopedic Group, LLP

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 28, 2025

Seema V. … Judge Brown orally granted defendants’ summary judgment motion on these claims during a pre-motion conference.

Neuberger v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

104 F.2d 649 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 12, 1939

. § 23 note, if construed to prevent such offsetting, as the Board held it did, is unconstitutional. Both questions must be answered in the negative upon the authority of prior decisions by this court. Johnston v. … Relying upon this court’s decision in Winmill v.

O'Connor v. Pierson

426 F.3d 187 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 11, 2005

Although the Board correctly notes that mootness goes to fedei*al subject-matter jurisdiction, see Muhammad v. City of N.Y. … Compare Martz v. Inc.

Freedom Holdings, Inc. v. Cuomo

624 F.3d 38 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 18, 2010

Id. at 227 (citing Parker v. Brown, 317 U.S. at 351-52 , 63 S.Ct. 307 ). … First, in Brown-Forman Distillers Corp. v.

Choate v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

129 F.2d 684 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 24, 1942

The facts were stipulated before the Board, and were found by it as stipulated. … The Board has made no finding as to that figure. Such a finding is for the Board, not for us, to make.

Collins v. New York City Transit Authority

305 F.3d 113 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 20, 2002

before the board. … See Alexander v.

Walczyk v. Rio

496 F.3d 139 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 1, 2007

Moreover, as this court observed in Brown v. … Montero v. Travis, 171 F.3d 757, 760 (2d Cir.1999) (extending absolute immunity to parole board officials performing a quasi-judicial function in making parole decisions); see also Butz v.

New York Health and Human Service Union, 1199/seiu, Afl-Cio v. Nyu Hospitals Center

343 F.3d 117 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 8, 2003

See Equal Employment Opportunity Comm’n v. J.B Hunt Transp., Inc., 321 F.3d 69, 73 (2d Cir.2003). … must apply the Board’s Rules and Regulations.”

King v. American Airlines, Inc.

284 F.3d 352 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 22, 2002

. § 41705 et seq., insofar as it was founded on actions that took place on board the aircraft); Brandt v. Am. Airlines, No. C 98-2089, 2000 WL 288393 , at *4 (N.D.Cal. … See Wolgel v.