Case law

DiLorenzo v. Murphy

443 F.3d 224 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 28, 2006

Kern County Land Co. v. Occidental Petroleum Corp., 411 U.S. 582, 595 , 93 S.Ct. 1736 , 36 L.Ed.2d 503 (1973). … See also Booth v.

Chen v. Garland

43 F.4th 244 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 5, 2022

Board of Immigration Appeals.” … 6 Board’s prior conclusion that he should be considered credible.”

United States Ex Rel. Bradley v. Watkins

163 F.2d 328 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 23, 1947

Ling Yee Suey v. Spar, 2 Cir., 149 F.2d 881 ; Blumen v. Haff, 9 Cir., 78 F.2d 833 ; United States ex rel. Fitleberg v. McCandless, 3 Cir., 47 F.2d 683 . Each of these authorities we think distinguishable. … Ling Yee Suey v. Spar, 2 Cir., 149 F.2d 881, 883 ; United States ex rel. Consola v. Karnuth, D.C., W.D.N.Y., 25 F.Supp. 902 . The third authority, United States ex rel. Fitleberg v.

Creasey v. Metro-North Commuter

269 F. App'x 75 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 13, 2008

To establish that the Board exceeded its jurisdiction, Creasey must show that it failed to construe the CBA. See CSX Transp., Inc. v. United Transp. … ; and (3) fraud or corruption); see also Shafii v.

Greene v. Brentwood Union Free School District

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 21, 2014

BROWN GREENE,             Plaintiff‐Appellant,         ‐v.‐            No. 13‐3532‐cv    BRENTWOOD UNION FREE SCHOOL DISTRICT, BOARD OF EDUCATION … Tomassi v. Insignia Fin. Grp., Inc., 478 F.3d  111, 115 (2d Cir. 2007).  

Hanson Trust Plc v. Ml Scm Acquisition Inc.

781 F.2d 264 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 6, 1986

Harris v. … Thompson v.

United States v. Haug

150 F.2d 911 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 16, 1945

Bartchy v. United States, 319 U.S. 484 , 63 S.Ct. 1206 , 87 L.Ed. 1534 . Indeed, the Institute appears to have held for him both the questionnaire and the “notice of delinquency” for a period of six months. … United States v. Trypuc, 2 Cir., 136 F.2d 900 ; Rule 10 of this court. The conviction fipon both counts will be reversed, and the second count will be dismissed.

United States v. Vincent James Houston

433 F.2d 939 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 28, 1970

In United States v. … Similarly, in United States v.

Bianchi v. Griffing

393 F.2d 457 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 5, 1968

Ambro v. Board of Supervisors etc., Sup.Ct., 287 N.Y.S.2d 458 (February 13, 1968). Compare Iannucci v. Board of Supervisors etc., 20 N.Y.2d 244 , 282 N.Y.S.2d 502 (1967) ; Seaman v. … See Ambro v. Board of Supervisors, supra; cf. Seaman v. Fedourich, supra.

Hughes v. Bricklayers & Allied Craftworkers Local 45

386 F.3d 101 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 6, 2004

Rosario v. Amalgamated Ladies’ Garment Cutters’ Union, Local 10, 605 F.2d 1228, 1238-39 (2d Cir.1979); accord Reyes v. … Sim v. New York Mailers’ Union No. 6, 166 F.3d 465 , 470 (2d Cir.1999); Fulk v. United Transp. Union, 160 F.3d 405, 408-09 (7th Cir.1998); Newell v. Int’l Bhd. of Elec.

Mr. v. Sloan

449 F.3d 405 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 18, 2006

The threshold question presented on this appeal is whether the holding of Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. … A.R. v. N.Y.

Grover William Sims, Second Lieutenant, United States Air Force Mam-Vj-Cxulfv v. Cecil E. Fox, Brigadier General, Etc., and Dr. John L. McLucas Secretary Ofthe Air Force

505 F.2d 857 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 30, 1974

See Cafeteria Workers v. McElroy, supra, 367 U.S. at 898, 81 S.Ct. at 1750. In the present case, however, this principle does not come into play.' Board of Regents v. … See Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners, 353 U.S. 232 , 77 S.Ct. 752 , 1 L.Ed.2d 796 and Willner v. Committee on Character, 373 U.S. 96 , 83 S.Ct. 1175 , 10 L.Ed.2d 224 .

Bridgeport Guardians, Inc. v. Arthur J. Delmonte, City of Bridgeport

248 F.3d 66 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 26, 2001

Chance v. Board of Examiners, 561 F.2d 1079, 1088 (2d Cir.1977). … V.

Time Inc. v. United States Postal Service

710 F.2d 34 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 8, 1983

(Act), a proceeding which has spawned two lengthy decisions by this Court, see Time, Inc. v. United States Postal Service, 685 F.2d 760 (2d Cir.1982); Newsweek, Inc. v. … See National Association of Greeting Card Publishers v.

Bosquet v. Holder

346 F. App'x 635 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 18, 2009

Liu v. Gonzales, 439 F.3d 109, 111 (2d Cir.2006) (per curiam). Motions to reconsider must be filed •within thirty days of the date on which the BIA decision is mailed. 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (b)(2). … See Rashid v. Mukasey, 533 F.3d 127, 132 (2d Cir.2008); Ali v. Gonzales, 448 F.3d 515, 517 (2d Cir.2006) (per curiam).

Watson v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

124 F.2d 437 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 8, 1942

Dalton v. Bowers, 287 U.S. 404 , 53 S.Ct. 205 , 77 L.Ed. 389 ; Burnet v. Clark, 287 U.S. 410 , 53 S.Ct. 207 , 77 L.Ed. 397 ; Burnet v. Commonwealth Improvement Co., 287 U.S. 415 , 53 S.Ct. 198 , 77 L.Ed. 399 . … In distinguishing the case of Burnet v.

The Herald Company v. National Labor Relations Board, and Building Service Employees International Union, Local 200, Afl-Cio, and Syracuse Mailers Union, No. 73, Intervenors. Building Service Employees International Union, Local 200, Afl-Cio, and Syracuse Mailers Union, No. 73 v. National Labor Relations Board, and the Herald Company, Intervenors

444 F.2d 430 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 11, 1971

Accordingly we grant enforcement of the Board's orders. 8 Since N.L.R.B. v. … B. v.

Hertz Corp. v. City of New York

1 F.3d 121 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 2, 1993

The board calculated the annual, general rent adjustments and processed individual claims for variances. … Brown, held that the Sherman Act does not apply when anticompetitive restraints are imposed by the states “as an act of government”. 317 U.S. 341, 352 , 63 S.Ct. 307, 314 , 87 L.Ed. 315 (1943).

Seymour Kloner v. United States

535 F.2d 730 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 10, 1976

The decision of the Board specified the former two grounds as the bases for revocation, while disregarding the subsequent arrests for which proceedings in state court remained pending. 1 The Board ordered appellant re-incarcerat … The Regional Director of the Board of Parole and the National Appeals Board upheld the revocation ruling. In separate pro se habeas corpus applications, appellant petitioned for relief on a variety of grounds.

Joseph v. Gonzales

221 F. App'x 63 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 20, 2007

See Secaida-Rosales v. INS, 331 F.3d 297, 307 (2d Cir.2003). … See Wu Biao Chen v. INS, 344 F.3d 272, 275 (2d Cir.2003); see also Yun-Zui Guan v.