Case law

Harvey v. Calhoon

324 F.2d 486 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 7, 1963

Co. v. System Federation No. 40, 300 U.S. 515, 552-553 , 57 S.Ct. 592 , 81 L.Ed. 789 (1937); Brown v. Board of Education, 349 U.S. 294, 300 , 75 S.Ct. 753 , 99 L.Ed. 1083 (1955). … We have noted Mamula v. United Steelworkers of America, 304 F.2d 108 (3 Cir.), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 823 , 83 S.Ct. 42 , 9 L.Ed.2d 63 (1962) and Beckman v.

Parker Rust-Proof Co. v. Western Union Telegraph Co.

105 F.2d 976 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 20, 1939

Sechler Carriage Co. v. … See Jolliffe v. Waldo, 1917 C.D. 15; Fanslow v. Whitney, 1919 C.D. 93; Nash v. Reeder, 1920 C.D. 72. Compare Milburn Co. v.

Bosquet v. Holder

346 F. App'x 635 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 18, 2009

Liu v. Gonzales, 439 F.3d 109, 111 (2d Cir.2006) (per curiam). Motions to reconsider must be filed •within thirty days of the date on which the BIA decision is mailed. 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (b)(2). … See Rashid v. Mukasey, 533 F.3d 127, 132 (2d Cir.2008); Ali v. Gonzales, 448 F.3d 515, 517 (2d Cir.2006) (per curiam).

EDRO Corp. d/B/a Dynawash v. National Labor Relations Board

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 31, 2016

Further, the Board “has ‘broad discretion’ in fashioning remedial orders.”   Mohave Elec. Co‐op., Inc. v. N.L.R.B., 206 F.3d 1183, 1192 (D.C. Cir. 2000) (quoting  ABF Freight System, Inc. v.  … We lack jurisdiction “to review  objections that were not urged before the Board.”  Woelke & Romero Framing, Inc.  v. NLRB, 456 U.S. 645, 666 (1982); accord Elec. Contractors, Inc. v. 

Methven v. Staten Island Light, Heat & Power Co.

66 F. 113 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 5, 1895

The board promised to protect his claim. … In Judson v.

Xiang Jin Zheng v. Holder

355 F. App'x 499 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 7, 2009

See Alibasic v. Mukasey, 547 F.3d 78, 83-84 (2d Cir.2008); see also Arias Chupina v. Holder, 570 F.3d 99, 103-05 (2d Cir.2009)(per curiam). … See INS v. Abudu, 485 U.S. 94, 104-05 , 108 S.Ct. 904 , 99 L.Ed.2d 90 (1988).

Det Forenede Dampskibs Selskab v. Insurance Co. of North America

31 F.2d 658 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 1, 1929

Ed. 35 ; Leggett v. 500 Cases of Tomatoes, 15 F.[2d] 270 [C. C. A. 2]; Cargo ex Galam, Browning & L. 167), and the master can enforce it only by retaining the goods. … C.) 29 F. 159 , is scarcely even a dictum, and Judge Brown’s in The Allianca (D. C.) 64 F. 871 , although we accepted his opinion in (C. C. A.) 79 F. 989 , is at variance with the decision in Dupont de Nemours v.

Barry v. City of New York

712 F.2d 1554 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 22, 1983

See J.P. v. … Nothing in the statute requires the Board *1563 of Ethics to consider the identity of the person seeking access, but nothing appears to bar the Board from doing so either.

Immediato v. Rye Neck School District

73 F.3d 454 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 2, 1996

See Murphy v. Arkansas, 852 F.2d 1039 (8th Cir.1988); Cornwell v. State Board of Educ., 428 F.2d 471 (4th Cir.1970) *462 (adopting per curiam the full opinion in Cornwell v. … See Brown v. Board of Educ., 347 U.S. 483, 493 , 74 S.Ct. 686, 691 , 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954) (“education is perhaps the most important function of state and local governments”); Ambach v.

Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,345 Anita B. Brody v. Chemical Bank, and Pennsylvania Company

482 F.2d 1111 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 3, 1973

Gottesman v. General Motors Corp., 268 F.2d 194, 197 (2d Cir. 1959); Dopp v. American Elec. Labs, Inc., 55 F.R.D. 151 , 155 n. 10 (S.D.N.Y.1972). … Co. v. Coblentz, 381 F.2d 185 , 189 n. 5 (5th Cir. 1967); Bartlett-Collins Co. v. Surinam Navigation Co., 381 F.2d 546, 550 (10th Cir. 1967).

Weissman v. Officer of the Day

444 F.2d 1326 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 2, 1971

When a local board fails to identify the ground upon which it based its decision to deny the requested classification, see United States v. … United States v. French, 429 F.2d 391 (9 Cir. 1970).

No. 484

403 F.2d 800 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 21, 1968

Brown v. United States, 263 U.S. 78 , 44 S.Ct. 92 , 68 L.Ed. 171 (1923) (entire town) (dictum); United States v. Certain Land in Borough of Brooklyn, supra (playground); United States v. … Board of Education of Mineral County, 253 F.2d 760 (4 Cir. 1958) (school grounds); State of Washington v.

United States v. Albers

115 F.2d 833 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 9, 1940

In Hamilton v. … Similarly in Rees v.

Raymond Argro v. United States

505 F.2d 1374 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 8, 1974

See Morrissey v. … Jones v. Cunningham, 371 U.S. 236 , 83 S.Ct. 373 , 9 L.Ed.2d 285 (1963). He seeks outright release if the parole board fails to comply with the procedural conditions sought to be imposed.

Hui Chen v. Holder

340 F. App'x 734 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 12, 2009

See Yan Chen v. Gonzales, 417 F.3d 268, 271 (2d Cir.2005). 2 We review the agency’s findings of fact under the substantial evidence standard. 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (b)(4)(B); see also Corovic v. … See Jian Xing Huang v. INS, 421 F.3d 125, 129 (2d Cir.2005).

Winston v. City of New York

759 F.2d 242 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 5, 1985

See Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. Engman, 527 F.2d 1115, 1119 (2d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 2237 , 48 L.Ed.2d 837 (1976). 7 The City relies heavily on Brady v. … Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. at 577 , 92 S.Ct. at 2709 .

Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Auto Strop Safety Razor Co., Inc.

74 F.2d 226 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 10, 1934

On the question of capital contribution, see United *227 States v. Oregon-Washington R. & Nav. Co., 251 F. 211 (C. C. A. 2). … Our attention has been called to general language used by way of illustration in our opinion in Commissioner v.

Friedberg v. Resor

453 F.2d 935 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 29, 1971

Hammond v. Lenfest, 398 F.2d 705 , 715. See also Hollingsworth v. Balcom, 441 F.2d 419, 421 (6th Cir. 1971); United States ex rel. Donham v. Resor, 436 F.2d 751, 754 (2d Cir. 1971); Smith v. … Donham v.

Salem Products Corporation v. United States

298 F.2d 808 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 31, 1962

Salem did not agree to the reduction and sought review by the Board. … Corp. v.

Teresa De Jesus Blanco v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

68 F.3d 642 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 20, 1995

See Mattis v. INS, 774 F.2d 965, 967 (9th Cir.1985) (failure to address all factors relevant to claim of hardship is abuse of discretion); Dhine v. … The Board’s ruling was an abuse of discretion.