Case law

Salem Products Corporation v. United States

298 F.2d 808 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 31, 1962

Salem did not agree to the reduction and sought review by the Board. … Corp. v.

Raul GONZALEZ, Appellee, v. Albert SHANKER Et Al., Appellants

533 F.2d 832 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 9, 1976

Morgan v. LaVallee, 526 F.2d 221, 224 (2d Cir. 1975). 11 . Lorenz v. Board of Education, 264 N.Y. 591 , 191 N.E. 579 (1934); Frankle v. Board of Education, 285 N.Y. 541 , 32 N.E.2d 830 (1941). … See Kinsella v. Board of Education of Central School District No. 7, 378 F.Supp. 54, 60 (W.D.N.Y.1974) (three-judge court).

40 Fair empl.prac.cas. 639, 39 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 35,983, unempl.ins.rep. Cch 21,789 Clarence C. Hill v. The Coca Cola Bottling Company of New York and John Hurley

786 F.2d 550 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 21, 1986

Sec. 1738 (1982); see also Migra v. … In Board of Education v.

Garden City Golf Club v. Corwin

62 F.2d 246 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 19, 1932

United States v. Ayer, 12 F.(2d) 194 (C. C. A. 1); United States v. Cruikshank (D. C.) 48 F.(2d) 352 . But it may not be said that every sum of money paid by a member to his club is taxable as dues. Foran v. … Thompson v. Wyandanch Club, 70 Misc. 299 , 127 N. Y. S. 195.

Montano v. Lee

384 F.2d 172 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 5, 1967

Ellis v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, 234 F.Supp. 945 (D.Md.1964), aff’d 352 F.2d 323 (4th Cir. 1965); Delozier v. Tyrone Area School Board, 247 F.Supp. 30 (W.D.Pa.1965); Seaman v. … Sailors v. Board of Education, 387 U.S. 105, 110 , 87 S.Ct. 1549, 1553 , 18 L.Ed.2d 650 (1967).

Crouse-Hinds Company, Plaintiff-Counterclaim-Defendant-Appellant v. Internorth, Inc., and in Holdings, Inc., Defendants-Counterclaim-Plaintiffs

634 F.2d 690 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 14, 1980

(Pollitz v. Wabash R.R. … Auerbach v. Bennett, 47 N.Y.2d 619, 629-31 , 419 N.Y.S.2d 920, 926-27 , 393 N.E.2d 994 (1979); compare Sinclair Oil Corp. v. Levien, 280 A.2d 717, 720 (Del.1971). In Treadway Companies v.

Harvey v. Calhoon

324 F.2d 486 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 7, 1963

Co. v. System Federation No. 40, 300 U.S. 515, 552-553 , 57 S.Ct. 592 , 81 L.Ed. 789 (1937); Brown v. Board of Education, 349 U.S. 294, 300 , 75 S.Ct. 753 , 99 L.Ed. 1083 (1955). … We have noted Mamula v. United Steelworkers of America, 304 F.2d 108 (3 Cir.), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 823 , 83 S.Ct. 42 , 9 L.Ed.2d 63 (1962) and Beckman v.

Wesley O. Paddock v. United States

280 F.2d 563 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 29, 1960

Jemison v. … Duffin v.

Pat Wright and Jack Lieberman v. Chief of Transit Police, and Chairman and Members of the Board of the New York City Transit Authority

558 F.2d 67 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 8, 1977

Lovell v. Griffin, 303 U.S. 444 , 58 S.Ct. 666 , 82 L.Ed. 949 (1938); Cantwell v. Connecticut, 310 U.S. 296 , 60 S.Ct. 900 , 84 L.Ed. 1213 (1940); Cox v. Louisiana, 379 U.S. 559 , 85 S.Ct. 476 , 13 L.Ed.2d 487 (1965). … Schneider v. State, 308 U.S. 147 , 60 S.Ct. 146 , 84 L.Ed. 155 (1939); cf. United States v. O’Brien, 391 U.S. 367, 376-77 , 88 S.Ct. 1673 , 20 L.Ed.2d 672 (1968); Shelton v.

Giuliano v. Commercial Stevedoring Co.

32 F.2d 1014 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 3, 1929

United States v. Sullivan, Bilda, Rankin

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 6, 2024

Krafick v. … board’s authorization does not bar criminal prosecution.”); United States v.

Affiliated Hospital Products, Inc. v. Merdel Game Manufacturing Company

513 F.2d 1183 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 31, 1975

The legends “100 Play Game Board,” “100 Play Game Board (Carom & Crokinole),” and “100 Play Carom Board” all appear typewritten on invoices during this period. … Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Safeway Properties, Inc., 307 F.2d 495, 499 (2 Cir. 1962); see also Venetianaire Corp. of America v. A. & P.

Kaster v. Modification Systems, Inc.

731 F.2d 1014 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 27, 1984

See Clark Enterprises, Inc. v. Holywell Corp., 559 F.Supp. 1307, 1309-12 (E.D.Va. 1983) (“Demand is likewise excused where the board of directors is subject to the control of the alleged wrongdoers.”); Abbe v. … The complaint must further indicate that the majority shareholder controls the votes of the board. 3 See Lewis v. Curtis, 671 F.2d 779, 785 (3d Cir.)

Arbeeny v. McRoberts Protective Agency

642 F.2d 672 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 9, 1981

See Warren Bros. v. Nelson, 635 F.2d 552, 556 (6th Cir. 1980); Boudloche v. Howard Trucking Co., Inc., 632 F.2d 1346, 1347 (5th Cir. 1980); Trotti & Thompson v. … The Board recognized that theft along the waterfront is a major problem plaguing the longshoring industry. We are not unmindful that this court en passant in Pittston Stevedoring Corp. v.

United States v. Feliz

467 F.3d 227 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 25, 2006

Specifically, in Ohio v. … See Davis v.

379 Madison Avenue v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

60 F.2d 68 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 5, 1932

See Auburn & Alton Coal Co. v. United States, 61 Ct. Cl. 438, 444 ; Bedell v. Commissioner, 30 F.(2d) 622, 625 (C. C. A. 2). … A. 156; Blair v. Oesterlein Machine Co., 57 App. D. C. 75, 17 F.(2d) 663, 665 ; B. T. A. v. United States, 59 App. D. C. 161, 37 F.(2d) 442, 443 . Cf. Lassen Lumber & Box Co. v. Blair, 27 F.(2d) 17, 19 (C. C. A. 9).

Kevin Bubnis v. Kenneth Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security

150 F.3d 177 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 16, 1998

Ass’n v. Weicker, 46 F.3d 211, 219 (2d Cir.1995); see also Davis v. … Hodge v. Shalala Bubnis invites us to follow the Ninth Circuit’s opinion in Hodge v.

Murphy v. New Milford Zoning Commission

402 F.3d 342 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 25, 2005

Under Connecticut law, a zoning board of appeals is required to hold a hearing “to find the facts and to apply the pertinent zoning regulations to those facts.” Caserta v. … In fact, a zoning board of appeals “ ‘is in the most advantageous position to interpret its own regulations and apply them to the situations before it.’ ” Id. (quoting Doyen v.

Aircraft Mechanics Fraternal Association, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. Atlantic Coast Airlines, Inc., Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellee

55 F.3d 90 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 19, 1995

Hagopian v. … In Virgin Atlantic Airways, Ltd. v.

Skenandoa Rayon Corp. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

122 F.2d 268 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 31, 1941

This motion the Board denied and its refusal is now alleged as error. The granting or denial of such motions rests in the sound discretion of the Board. Commissioner v. Sussman, 2 Cir., 102 F.2d 919, 923 . … The order of the Board is affirmed.