Case law

National Labor Relations Board v. Matros Automated Electrical Construction Corp.

366 F. App'x 184 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 11, 2010

09-2249-ag(L), 09-2591-ag(XAP), 09-2885-ag(XAP) National Labor Relations Board v. Matros Automated Electrical Construction Corp. … v.

United Aircraft Corporation v. Canel Lodge No. 700, International Association of MacHinists and Aerospace Workers, Afl-Cio

436 F.2d 1 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 11, 1970

B. v. Strong, 393 U.S. 357 , 89 S.Ct. 541 , 21 L.Ed.2d 546 (1969); N. L. R. B. v. C. & C. Plywood Corp., 385 U.S. 421 , 87 S.Ct. 559 , 17 L.Ed.2d 486 (1967); Carey v. … It is clear that an employer may not resist contract arbitration on the ground that it prefers the Board as a forum. Carey v. Westinghouse Electric Corp., supra, 375 U.S. at 268 , 84 S.Ct. 401 ; Smith v.

Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,143

608 F.2d 64 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 12, 1979

Santa Fe Industries, Inc. v. Green, 430 U.S. 462, 474-80 , 97 S.Ct. 1292 , 51 L.Ed.2d 480 (1977); Browning Debenture Holders' Committee v. … Segal v.

Local 814, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers v. J & B Systems Installers & Moving, Inc.

878 F.2d 38 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 13, 1989

Corp. v. New York City Dist. Council Carpenters Benefit Funds, 748 F.2d 79 , 84 (2d Cir.1984). … To prevail on this point, appellants must point to some prejudice they suffered as a result of the Joint Board’s action. This they have failed to do. Cf. Kirkland v.

Wesley O. Paddock v. United States

280 F.2d 563 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 29, 1960

Jemison v. … Duffin v.

Stetzer v. Logistec of Connecticut, Inc.

547 F.3d 459 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 28, 2008

Connors v. … Programs v.

Air Line Pilots Ass'n International v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.

713 F.2d 940 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 1, 1983

Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 290-94 , 99 S.Ct. 1705, 1711-1714 , 60 L.Ed.2d 208 (1979) (Chrysler cannot sue under FOIA, a disclosure statute, to force non disclosure); Von Aulock v. … Cf. 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(c)(3) (Title VII); Stamford Board of Education v. Stamford Education Association, 697 F.2d 70, 73 (2d Cir.1982).

Affiliated Hospital Products, Inc. v. Merdel Game Manufacturing Company

513 F.2d 1183 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 31, 1975

The legends “100 Play Game Board,” “100 Play Game Board (Carom & Crokinole),” and “100 Play Carom Board” all appear typewritten on invoices during this period. … Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Safeway Properties, Inc., 307 F.2d 495, 499 (2 Cir. 1962); see also Venetianaire Corp. of America v. A. & P.

Garrett Aiden Cannon v. United States

288 F.2d 269 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 27, 1961

. § 1426 (a) (effective December 24, 1952), a section interpreted by the Supreme Court in Ceballos v. … Ceballos v. Shaughnessy, supra. *271 Appellant’s case and that of Hoellger are remarkably similar.

379 Madison Avenue v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

60 F.2d 68 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 5, 1932

See Auburn & Alton Coal Co. v. United States, 61 Ct. Cl. 438, 444 ; Bedell v. Commissioner, 30 F.(2d) 622, 625 (C. C. A. 2). … A. 156; Blair v. Oesterlein Machine Co., 57 App. D. C. 75, 17 F.(2d) 663, 665 ; B. T. A. v. United States, 59 App. D. C. 161, 37 F.(2d) 442, 443 . Cf. Lassen Lumber & Box Co. v. Blair, 27 F.(2d) 17, 19 (C. C. A. 9).

Thomas J. Kerrigan v. Gerald A. Boucher

450 F.2d 487 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 14, 1971

The court below relied on Powell v. … Heumann et al. v. Board of Educ. of City of New York, 320 F.Supp. 623, 625 (S.D.N.Y.1970).

Gaston Lafaille v. Benefits Review Board, United States Department of Labor Director Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor, General Dynamics Corporation, and Insurance Company of North America

884 F.2d 54 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 22, 1989

Hole v. … Similarly, in Randall v.

Charry v. Hall

709 F.2d 139 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 19, 1983

See, e.g., Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). If not, the complaint would be dismissible as a matter of law. … Board of Regents v. Roth, supra, 408 U.S. at 577 , 92 S.Ct. at 2709 . See in accord Pence v.

Vartelas v. Holder

620 F.3d 108 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 9, 2010

The Board also rejected the contention that the IIRIRAamended version of INA § 101(a)(13) was impermissibly retroactive as applied to Vartelas, noting that Vartelas cited only Camins v. … Accord De Vega v. Gonzales, 503 F.3d 45, 48 (1st Cir.2007); Camins v. Gonzales, 500 F.3d at 880 ; Malagon de Fuentes v. Gonzales, 462 F.3d 498, 501-02 (5th Cir.2006); Tineo v.

Thomas McKee v. David Harris, Superintendent, Green Haven Correctional Facility, Stormville, New York

649 F.2d 927 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 28, 1981

Brown v. United States, 264 F.2d 363, 369 (D.C.Cir.) (in banc), cert. denied, 360 U.S. 911 , 79 S.Ct. 1299 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1262 (1959) (Burger, J., concurring). … In Brown v.

Léone Meyer v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma

597 F. App'x 27 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 12, 2015

14-2044 Léone Meyer v. … See Minnett v. Time Warner, 997 F.2d 1023, 1026 (2d Cir. 1993).

The Bouker No. 2

241 F. 831 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 20, 1917

Judge Betts’ earlier decisions (Nevitt v. Clarke, Olc. 316 ; The Atlantic, 1 Abb. Adm. 451 ; Ringgold v. Crocker, 1 Abb. Adm. 344 ) were reviewed by Judge Addison Brown in The City of Alexandria (D. … On the other hand, the opinion of Justice (then District Judge) Brown in The J. F. Card (D.

American Patents Development Corp. v. Carbice Corp. of America

38 F.2d 62 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 3, 1930

Justice Brown’s citation of *67 Wilson v. Simpson, 9 How. 109 , 13 L. Ed. 66 , in support of the decision. A somewhat similar view is expressed by Mr. Justice McKenna in Leeds & Catlin Co. v. … Justice Brown’s opinion did not sanction such a reconstruction is clearly implied from his citation of American Cotton Tie Co. v. Simmons, 106 U. S. 89 , 1 S. Ct. 52 , 27 L.

The Niel Maersk

91 F.2d 932 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 2, 1937

Clark v. Barnwell, 12 How. 272, 283, 284 , 13 L.Ed. 985 ; Monnier v. United States (D.C.) 16 F.(2d) 812 , affirmed 16 F.(2d) 815 (C.C.A.2); Pan-American Hide Co. v. … But in Schnell v.

Hannevig v. R. W. J. Sutherland & Co.

256 F. 445 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 15, 1919

Case v. Ferris, 2 Hill (N. Y.) 75, 76. … Ott v. Schroeppel, 5 N. Y. 482 .