Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersca2

10,000+ results

0.71s

  • Twersky v. Yeshiva University

    579 F. App'x 7 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 4, 2014

    See Zumpano v. … Simcuski v.

    Cited 51 timesPublished
  • Brown v. City Of Oneonta

    235 F.3d 769 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 18, 2000

    See Brown v. City of Oneonta, 221 F.3d 329 (2d Cir. 2000). … See Brown v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • United States v. Gregory v. Brown

    937 F.2d 32 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 20, 1991

    United States v. Khan, 787 F.2d 28, 33 (2d Cir.1986). … United States v. Oguns, 921 F.2d 442, 449 (2d Cir.1990).

    Cited 30 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Federal Bureau of Investigation

    658 F.2d 71 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 24, 1981

    Board of Trade of the City of Chicago v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, 627 F.2d 392, 397 (D.C.Cir. 1980). … S. v. Cavallaro (and Brown), 553 F.2d 300 (2nd Cir. 1977).

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • United States v. Charles F. Brown

    602 F.2d 1073 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 13, 1979

    In United States v. … Under United States v. Sanford, 429 U.S. 14 , 97 S.Ct. 20 , 50 L.Ed.2d 17 (1976) (per curiam), and Serfass v.

    Cited 38 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Arroyo

    109 F. App'x 469 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 17, 2004

    Plaintiff Larry Brown brought this § 1983 action, claiming that he had been subjected to an illegal search and to malicious prosecution for speeding and driving under the influence of drugs. … See, e.g., Gierlinger v. Gleason, 160 F.3d 858, 869 (2d Cir.1998). But, even if we assume that he did, the evidence was sufficient to support the jury’s verdict. See Meriwether v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Green v. Brown

    99 F. App'x 320 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 25, 2004

    While this Court reads a pro se litigant’s papers liberally and “interpret[s] them to raise the strongest arguments that they suggest,” Burgos v. Hopkins, 14 F.3d 787, 790 (2d. … Cir.1994), “we need not manufacture claims of error for an appellant proceeding pro se. ” LoSacco v. City of Middletown, 71 F.3d 88, 93 (2d Cir.1995).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United States v. Henry Stuart Brown

    511 F.2d 920 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 20, 1975

    We do not think that what was said in United States v. … United States v. Super, 492 F.2d 319, 323 (2d Cir. 1974).

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Schachter v. Brown

    93 F. App'x 320 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 1, 2004

    “A complaint will be dismissed as ‘frivolous’ when ‘it is clear that the defendants are immune from suit.’ ” Montero v. Travis, 171 F.3d 757, 760 (2d Cir.1999) (quoting Neitzke v. … See Moccio v. New York State Office of Court Admin., 95 F.3d 195, 198 (2d Cir.1996); see also Fed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United States v. Theodore Lawrence Brown

    899 F.2d 189 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 27, 1990

    Third, Brown extracts from Bearden v. … In Gagnon v.

    Cited 36 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Dunbar & Sullivan Dredging Co.

    189 F.2d 871 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 8, 1951

    . § 201 et seq., to pay William Brown and others overtime wages for work performed during the years 1939 through 1944. … Gibbons v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of United States, 2 Cir., 173 F.2d 337, 339 .

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Parkchester South Condo

    232 F. App'x 67 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 17, 2007

    SUMMARY ORDER Plaintiff-Appellant Joel Brown appeals from the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Appellee Parkchester South Condo (“PSC”) on Brown’s claims of employment discrimination under Title VII of … They further conceded that the district court did not compensate for this failure, pursuant to Vital v. Interfaith Med. Ctr., 168 F.3d 615, 620-21 (2d Cir.1999).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Knowlton

    505 F.2d 727 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 30, 1974

    505 F.2d 727 Brown v. Knowlton 74-1513 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Second Circuit 10/30/74 S.D.N.Y., 370 F.Supp. 1119 AFFIRMED

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Lerman

    76 F. App'x 374 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 26, 2003

    The second was brought against Brookwood, alleging breach of its contract with the City (to which Brown was a beneficiary). … See Young v. County of Fulton, 160 F.3d 899, 902 (2d Cir.1998). In doing so, we construe the evidence in the light most favorable to the non-moving party and draw all reasonable inferences in his favor. See Anderson v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United States v. Michael A. Brown

    321 F.3d 347 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 28, 2003

    See United States v. … See United States v.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • In re Petrobras Securities

    Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 7, 2017

    (quoting  Brown  v.  Kelly,  609  F.3d  467,  476  (2d Cir.  2010))).    … v. 

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ramsay v. Brown

    425 F.2d 674 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 24, 1970

    425 F.2d 674 Dorothy Limoges RAMSAY as Guardian of the Person and Estate of Raymond Paul Blow, Appellee, v. C. E. BROWN, a/k/a Clayton E. Brown, or C. E. Brown Agricultural Implement and Machinery Dealer, Appellant. … See Watterlund v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Green v. Brown

    398 F.2d 1006 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 29, 1968

    GREEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. J. Carter BROWN, Henry C. Brunie, L. A. Casler, W. P. Considine, Henry A. Loeb, Royal Little, James E. Robison, Albert H. Rubenstein, Clark Simonds, J. B. … Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. Pataki

    320 F.3d 200 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 13, 2003

    Mfrs’ Ass’n v. … ILGWU v.

    Cited 41 timesPublished
  • Fox v. Brown

    402 F.2d 837 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 24, 1969

    Moreover, where the status of persons within the armed forces has been at issue, rather than the classification of civilians by a local board, courts have followed the Orloff approach, supra; see Brown v. … Selective Service Local Board No. 16, 372 F.2d 817 (2d Cir. 1967) 5 For these reasons, our decision in Hammond v. Lenfest, 398 F.2d 705 (2d Cir.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.