Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
4.02s
United States Ex Rel. Medeiros v. Watkins
166 F.2d 897 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 9, 1948
On June 22, 1945, after several hearings before an Immigration Board of Special Inquiry, he was ordered excluded. This order was affirmed by the Board of Immigration Appeals, July 16, 1945. … Brown, and his place of birth as Bermuda. He was released in 1923.
Cited 11 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Niagara Machine & Tool Works
746 F.2d 143 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 12, 1984
NLRB v. … We will defer to a Board conclusion that particular conduct "adversely affects protected employee interests," Metropolitan Edison Co. v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedKaplan v. Board of Education of the City School District
759 F.2d 256 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 8, 1985
E.g., Sperry International Trade, Inc. v. Government of Israel, 670 F.2d 8, 11 (2 Cir.1982); Jackson Dairy, Inc. v. H.P. Hood & Sons, Inc., 596 F.2d 70, 72 (2 Cir.1979). … While recognizing that the employees did have a protectable “interest in avoiding disclosure of personal matters”, Nixon v. Administrator of General Services, 433 U.S. 425, 457 (1977); Whalen v.
Cited 15 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Volney Felt Mills, Inc.
162 F.2d 204 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 2, 1947
Tony Cincotta, the respondent’s plant superintendent, had been one of its most important witnesses, and had denied the statements which the respondent’s employees charged against him, and which were a large factor in the Board
Cited 1 timesPublishedD.D. ex rel. V.D. v. New York City Board of Education
465 F.3d 503 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 12, 2006
Dist. v. … The New York City Board of Education has been renamed the "New York City Department of Education.” See A.R. ex rel. R.V. v. New York City Dep't. of Educ., 407 F.3d 65 , 67 n. 2 (2d Cir.2005). .
Cited 101 timesPublished595 F. App'x 12 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 11, 2014
13-4080-cv Dekom v. … Although the question whether other individuals are similarly situated to a plaintiff is ordinarily a question of fact, see Brown v. Daikin Am.
Cited 7 timesUnpublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Master Touch Dental Laboratories, Inc.
405 F.2d 80 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 16, 1968
International Brotherhood of Teamsters, v. … This court stated in Bourne v.
Cited 11 timesPublishedHang Chen v. Board of Immigration Appeals
285 F. App'x 816 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 14, 2008
See Majidi v. … See Paul v. Gonzales, 444 F.3d 148, 156 (2d Cir.2006); Xue Hong Yang v. U.S.
Cited 0 timesPublishedJ. P. Stevens & Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
380 F.2d 292 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 7, 1967
However, the Fourth and Sixth Circuits have disagreed with the Board, see Wellington Mill Div., West Point Mfg. Co. v. … Co. v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Halben Chemical Co., Inc.
279 F.2d 189 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 9, 1960
This is one of the growing list of cases in which the courts are required to pass on the propriety of the Board’s imposing the so-called Brown-Olds remedy of dues reimbursement, 115 N.L.R.B. 594 (1956), for unfair labor practices … But it contends that imposition of the Brown-Olds remedy in this case is arbitrary.
Cited 1 timesPublishedUnited States v. James Leonard, Robert Seyfert, John Papajohn and Donald M. Brown
50 F.3d 1152 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 28, 1995
See United States v. Leonard, 817 F.Supp. 286, 305 (E.D.N.Y.1992). … United States v.
Cited 35 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. St. Joe Paper Co.
319 F.2d 819 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 25, 1963
The Board found that St. … B. v. Jarka Corp., 198 F.2d 618, 621 (3 Cir. 1952). Had the union been innocent of any intent to cause Rotolo’s •discharge, no violation of § 8(b) (2) with respect to this incident could have been found.
Cited 1 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Masters-Lake Success, Inc.
287 F.2d 35 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 15, 1961
the Board’s wide discretion in determining the appropriate bargaining unit. … In these circumstances, application of the Brown-Olds remedy is unduly harsh. See Building Material Teamsters, Local 282, International Broth, of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America v. N. L. R.
Cited 1 timesPublished155 F.2d 978 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 31, 1946
Our decision to the contrary in Marshall v. United States, 2 Cir., 197 F. 511 , was almost immediately in substance overruled by two of the same judges who made it (Farmer v. … United States, 2 Cir., 223 F. 903, 911 ), and, as we said in National Labor Relations Board v. National Seal Corporation, 2 Cir., 127 F.2d 776, 778 , the cases to the contrary “are legion.”
Cited 3 timesPublishedZao Sun v. Board of Immigration Appeals
292 F. App'x 156 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 16, 2008
See Li Yong Zheng v. U.S. … Melnitsenko v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedThe Connecticut Light & Power Company v. National Labor Relations Board
476 F.2d 1079 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 6, 1973
Cross & Co. v. NLRB, 174 F.2d 875, 878 (1 Cir. 1949); Inland Steel Co. v. … NLRB v. Brown, 380 U.S. 278, 291 (1965).
Cited 19 timesPublished634 F. App'x 806 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 15, 2015
14-3497-cr United States v. … United States v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedCocker Saw Company, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
446 F.2d 870 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 7, 1971
In Ray Brooks v. … But the Board has broad sanction powers. NLRB v. Gissel Pack *873 ing Co., 395 U.S. 575 (1969).
Cited 3 timesPublishedYan Chen v. Board of Immigration Appeals
277 F. App'x 68 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 7, 2008
See Yan Chen v. Gonzales, 417 F.3d 268, 271 (2d Cir.2005). … See, e.g., Secaida-Rosales v. I.N.S., 331 F.3d 297, 307 (2d Cir.2003).
Cited 0 timesPublishedInternational Longshoremen's Association, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board
537 F.2d 706 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 29, 1976
The Board recognized in its opinion that a labor contract that seeks to preserve work traditionally done in the bargaining unit does not violate section 8(e). National Woodwork Mfrs. Ass'n v. … Therefore, I would not enforce the Board's order. * Senior District Judge of the District of Massachusetts, sitting by designation 1 Compare Intercontinental Container Transport Corporation v.
Cited 6 timesPublished
Ask Donna