Case law

Brown v. West Brooklyn

49 F. 688 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 14, 1891

Brown v. City of Oneonta

221 F.3d 329 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 8, 2000

In Terry v. … See Brown v. City of Oneonta, 106 F.3d 1125 (2d Cir.1997). Accordingly, those claims are no longer part of this case. .

United States v. Larry Brown

644 F.2d 101 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 16, 1981

Reynolds v. United States, 98 U.S. 145, 156 , 25 L.Ed. 244 (1878). In Mikus v. … On these bases we choose not to follow United States v. Allsup, supra. Consistent with our decision in Mikus v.

Connell v. Vermilya-Brown Co.

164 F.2d 924 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 28, 1947

Co. v. … De Lima v. Bidwell, 182 U.S. 1 , 21 S.Ct. 743 , 45 L.Ed. 1041 ; Huus v. New York & P. R. S. S. Co., 182 U.S. 392 , 21 S.Ct. 827 , 45 L.Ed. 1146 ; Fourteen Diamond Rings v.

United States v. Brown

70 F. App'x 42 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 23, 2003

Robert Brown v. United States

333 F.2d 723 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 8, 1964

While this would be sufficient reason for affirmance, Thompson v. … United States v. On Lee, 201 F.2d 722 (2d Cir.) cert. denied, 345 U.S. 936 , 73 S.Ct. 798 , 97 L.Ed. 1364 (1953). In the present case, Brown has clearly failed to make the requisite showing. The order is affirmed.

United States v. Brown

152 F. App'x 55 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 18, 2005

Brown’s request. … See United States v. Williams, 260 F.3d 160, 164-65 (2d Cir.2001) (citing United States v. Brown, 232 F.3d 44, 48 (2d Cir.2000), and United States v. Velasquez, 136 F.3d 921 , 923 n. 1 (2d Cir.1998)). .

United States v. Brown

55 F.2d 72 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 18, 1932

There was sufficient evidence to support the finding that Brown and Lieberman were the owner's of the business; that a common nuisance was permitted by the owners to exist at the premises in violation of the Prohibition Act … United States v. Collins and Lawlor (C. C. A.) 55 F.(2d) 70 . Decree modified to vacate the personal injunction against Lieberman and in all other respects affirmed.

Brown v. City of New York

862 F.3d 182 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 5, 2017

Brown v. City of New York, 13-cv-1018, 2016 WL 1611502 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 20, 2016) (“Brown III”). … Brown next cites Bellows v.

United States v. Brown

97 F. App'x 348 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 5, 2004

evidence before the district court did not specify the subsection of § 220.16 under which he was convicted, and because intent to distribute is not an element of every subsection of § 220.16, see generally United States v. … See United States v. King, 325 F.3d 110, 114 (2d Cir.2003). Accordingly, we conclude that Brown properly received the 16-point enhancement to his guideline calculation and hereby AFFIRM the judgment of conviction.

United States v. Wayne Brown

961 F.2d 1039 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 9, 1992

See United States v. … United States v.

Brown v. City of New York

798 F.3d 94 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 19, 2015

(quoting United States v. … See Whitley v.

Thermal Surgical, LLC v. Brown

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 8, 2025

See Loomis v. … Hecht v.

Brown v. City Of Oneonta

106 F.3d 1125 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 14, 1997

As stated in Salim v. … Fay v. South Colonie Cent. Sch.

Brown v. Eli Lilly and Co.

654 F.3d 347 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 18, 2011

10-512-cv Brown v. … Brown v. Noxubee Gen.

United States v. Brown

7 F.3d 221 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 27, 1993

7 F.3d 221 U.S. v. Brown NO. 93-1083 United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Sept 27, 1993 1 Appeal From: E.D.N.Y. 2 AFFIRMED.

Brown v. Johnson & Johnson

60 F.3d 811 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 13, 1995

60 F.3d 811 Brown v. Johnson & Johnson NO. 94-7810 United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. June 13, 1995 Appeal From: S.D.N.Y. 92-cv-7886 1 AFFIRMED.

Brown v. The Advance

73 F. 503 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 6, 1896

The additional facts which are of importance in hoce cases are as follows: The libel-ants are the pa miera composing die banking house of Brown Bros. & Go., of Yew York City, and the Loudon banking house of Brown, Bhiploy … Brown, Bhipley & Co. issued hi New York City, upon the express request, in.

United States v. Brown

22 F.3d 1092 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 28, 1994

22 F.3d 1092 U.S. v. Brown NO. 92-1256 United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Mar 28, 1994 1 Appeal From: E.D.N.Y.; Appealing after remand 990 F.2d 622 2 AFFIRMED.

United States v. Brown

932 F.2d 955 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 12, 1991

932 F.2d 955 U.S. v. Brown NO. 90-1611 United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. APR 12, 1991 1 Appeal From: S.D.N.Y. 2 AFFIRMED.