Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.59s
National Labor Relations Board v. Local 46
149 F.3d 93 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 26, 1998
(BNA) 2684 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. … However, because substantial evidence does not support the Board's denial to Local 46 of an affirmative defense under NLRB v. Transportation Mgmt.
Cited 0 timesPublishedM.D., Mr. & Mrs. D. v. Southington Board of Education
16 F. App'x 70 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 6, 2001
(collectively, “D family”) appeal from a judgment of the District Court granting the motion to dismiss of defendant-appellee Southington Board of Education (“Board of Education”), and dismissing the D family’s complaint. … D. v. Southington Bd. of Educ., 119 F.Supp.2d 105, 107 (D.Conn.2000).
Cited 2 timesPublishedZelnik v. Fashion Institute of Technology
464 F.3d 217 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 14, 2006
Brown explained, however, that she had considered the nomination “anew” and found “nothing in it that would persuade [her], at [that] time, to recommend the elevation of Professor Zelnik to emeritus status to FIT’s Board … Garcetti v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. J. Coty Messenger Service, Inc.
763 F.2d 92 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 29, 1985
Coty’s claims are almost entirely factual and must be rejected if there is substantial evidence in the record to support the board’s conclusions. N.L.R.B. v. … The findings of the board cannot be lightly overturned, particularly when they are based upon the board’s assessment of witness credibility. N.L.R.B. v.
Cited 36 timesPublishedReid v. Board of Education of City of New York
453 F.2d 238 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 14, 1971
In Devine v. … McMillan v. Board of Education, 331 F.Supp. 302 (S.D.N.Y.1971). 10 See note 9 supra
Cited 22 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Greater New York Broadcasting Corp.
147 F.2d 337 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 6, 1945
B. v. Standard Oil Co., 2 Cir., 138 F.2d SS5, 889. Cf. Fiddelke v. United States, 9 Cir., 47 F.2d 751 , 752: Thompson v. United States, 3 Cir., 283 F. 895, 897 ; Bryant v. … B. v. Yale & Towne Mfg. Co., 2 Cir., 114 F.2d 370, 379 ; M. H. Ritzwoller Co. v. N. L. R. B., 7 Cir., 114 F.2d 432, 434, 435 ; Fort Wayne, etc., Co. v. N. L. R. B., 7 Cir., 111 F.2d 869, 873 ; N. L. R. B. v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedSecurities & Exchange Commission v. American Board of Trade, Inc.
751 F.2d 529 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 26, 1984
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Commonwealth Chemical Securities, Inc., 574 F.2d 90 (2d Cir.1978). Securities and Exchange Commission v. American Board of Trade, 593 F.Supp. 335, 338 (S.D.N.Y.1984). … SEC v. American Board of Trade, 593 F.Supp. at 342 . The same has been true in this court, despite the SEC’s assertion in a footnote to its brief that it has not abandoned the issue. .
Cited 2 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Park Edge Sheridan Meats, Inc.
323 F.2d 956 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 30, 1963
We-therefore grant enforcement of the Board’s order. Issues regarding the extent of respondents’ back pay liability are properly deferred to the compliance stage of Board proceedings. See N. L. R. B. v. … Brown & Root, Inc., 203 F.2d 139, 147 (8 Cir. 1953).
Cited 16 timesPublishedLaborers' International Union Of North America, Afl-Cio, Local 104 v. National Labor Relations Board
945 F.2d 55 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 24, 1991
Id. at 64 (quoting N.L.R.B. v. … See NLRB v. Radio and Television Broadcast Engineers Union, Local 1212, 364 U.S. 573, 576-77 , 81 S.Ct. 330, 332-33 , 5 L.Ed.2d 302 (1961); NLRB v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Office Towel Supply Co., Inc
201 F.2d 838 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 6, 1953
B. v. Dinion Coil Co., 2 Cir., 201 F.2d 484 . … This case is unlike Cusano v. N. L. R.
Cited 11 timesPublished629 F.2d 773 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 24, 1980
March 10, 1980); Auburn School District v. HEW, No. 78-154 (D.N.H. March 29, 1979), appeal dismissed, No. 79-1261 (1st Cir. 1980); Board of Education of Bowling Green City District v. HEW, No. … See Caulfield v. Board of Education of th e City of New York, 583 F.2d 605, 610-11 (2d Cir. 1978); United States v.
Cited 16 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Everett Van Kleeck & Co., Inc
189 F.2d 516 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 31, 1951
Van Kleeck’s statements to them. *517 The facts are stated in the Board’s opinion, 88 N.L.R.B. 785 , and need not be here repeated. The decision of the Board was not unanimous. Mr. … Bd. v. Consolidated Mach. Tool Corp., 2 Cir., 163 F.2d 376, 378, 379 , certiorari denied 332 U.S. 824 , 68 S.Ct. 164 , 92 L.Ed. 399 ; Joy Silk Mills v. National Labor Rel. Bd., D.C.Cir., 185 F.2d 732, 741 .
Cited 4 timesPublishedPublishers' Association Of New York City v. National Labor Relations Board
364 F.2d 293 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 25, 1966
NLRB v. Insurance Agts. Int'l Union, 361 U.S. 477 , 80 S.Ct. 419 , 4 L.Ed.2d 454 (1960); NLRB v. Brown et al., 380 U.S. 278 , 85 S.Ct. 980 , 13 L.Ed.2d 839 (1965); American Ship Building Co. v. … v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedA.E. ex rel. E. v. Westport Board of Education
251 F. App'x 685 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 18, 2007
*687 SUMMARY ORDER The plaintiff-appellant sued the West-port Board of Education (the “Board”) under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400 et seq. … Frank G. v. Bd. of Educ., 459 F.3d 356, 363 (2d Cir.2006) (quotation marks omitted).
Cited 3 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Charles R. Krimm Lumber Co.
203 F.2d 194 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 2, 1953
But we cannot say that there was not substantial evidence on the whole record to support the Board’s finding on this question of fact. Universal Camera Corp. v. N. L. R. … The Board was entitled to consider the employer’s conduct as a whole in concluding that other incidents were illegal interferences with the employees’ right to organize in violation of § 8(a) 1. See Canyon Corp. v. N.
Cited 14 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Midvalley Steel Fabricators, Inc.
621 F.2d 49 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 7, 1980
Since the draft embodied agreed-upon terms, it was within the Board’s power to order respondent to execute the draft upon the Union’s request. See H. J. Heinz Co. v. … The “substantial evidence” standard of review “is not modified in any way” by the failure of the Board and the ALJ to agree on this issue. See Universal Camera Corp. v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedViking Industrial Security, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
225 F.3d 131 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 28, 2000
This Court granted enforcement of the Board’s order on September 15, 1992. See NLRB v. Viking Indus. Sec., Inc., No. 92-4139 (2d Cir. Sept. 15, 1992). … We note without surprise that in all of the cases cited by the Board in support of derivative liability, the two entities were still united at the time of the relevant proceedings. See NLRB v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedWest Virginia Investment Management Board v. Doral Financial Corp.
344 F. App'x 717 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 3, 2009
SUMMARY ORDER Plaintiffs West Virginia Investment Management Board, Angel A. … Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc., 282 F.3d 147, 152 (2d Cir.2002); see also ATSI Commc’ns, Inc. v. Shaar Fund, Ltd., 493 F.3d 87, 98 (2d Cir.2007).
Cited 1 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Volney Felt Mills, Inc.
162 F.2d 204 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 2, 1947
Tony Cincotta, the respondent’s plant superintendent, had been one of its most important witnesses, and had denied the statements which the respondent’s employees charged against him, and which were a large factor in the Board
Cited 1 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. The Pembek Oil Corporation
433 F.2d 308 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 14, 1970
NLRB v. Pembek Oil Corp., 404 F.2d 105 (2d Cir. 1968). We therefore enforced the traditional Board remedies of cease-and-desist orders and reinstatement. … Having in mind that we are to give “special respect” to the Board’s choice of remedies, 1 we cannot say that there is not a fair basis for its conclusion. Byrne Dairy, Inc. v. NLRB, 431 F.2d 1363 (1970). See NLRB v.
Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna