Case law

Zinnamon v. NYC Department of Education/Board of Education

377 F. App'x 42 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 13, 2010

See Zinnamon v. N.Y.C. Dep’t of Educ., No. 08-CV-1399 (E.D.N.Y. Oct.8, 2008). Finding no merit in Zinnamon’s remaining arguments, we hereby AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.

Constellation Brands, U.S. Operations, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

842 F.3d 784 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 21, 2016

Operations, Inc. v. … Hosp. v. 

National Labor Relations Board v. Friedman-Harry Marks Clothing Co.

85 F.2d 1 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 13, 1936

The board filed complaints under section 10 (b) of the act ( 29 U.S.C.A. § 160 (b), and after a hearing respondent was found to have violated the act and was ordered to cease and desist from the unfair labor practices. … Carter v. Carter Coal Co., 56 S.Ct. 855 , 80 L.Ed. 1160 , May 18, 1936; Schechter Poultry Corporation v. United States, 295 U.S. 495 , 55 S.Ct. 837 , 79 L.Ed. 1570 , 97 A.L.R. 947 .

National Labor Relations Board v. Willow Maintenance Corp.

332 F.2d 367 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 13, 1964

B. v. … NLRB v. United Aircraft Corp., 324 F.2d at 131 .

National Labor Relations Board v. Sandy Hill Iron & Brass Works

165 F.2d 660 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 5, 1947

United States v. The Schooner Peggy, 1 Cranch 103, 110 , 2 L.Ed. 49 ; Ziffrin, Inc., v. United States, 318 U.S. 73 , 63 S.Ct. 465 , 87 L.Ed. 621 ; N. L. R. B. v. Atkins & Co., 7 Cir., 165 F.2d 659 . … It will then be the Board’s duty to make this portion of the order precise and it may then, if necessary, move to make the enforcement order definite and final on this point. N. L. R. B. v.

Containair Systems Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

521 F.2d 1166 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 18, 1975

The Board exercises broad discretion in the selection of remedies, Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. NLRB, 379 U.S. 203, 216 , 85 S.Ct. 398 , 13 L.Ed.2d 233 (1964); Amalgamated Local Union 355 v. … Local 138, Operating Engineers v.

Lembeck v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.

9 F.2d 558 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 13, 1925

On its face the whole resolution seems to us to put operation in the board. … S. v. Percheman, 7 Pet. 51, 85 , 8 L. Ed. 604 ; U. S. v. Wiggins, 14 Pet. 334, 346, 347 , 10 L. Ed. 481 ; Mechan v. Forsyth, 24 How. 175, 176 , 16 L. Ed. 730 ; Breitmayer v. U. S., 249 F. 929, 932, 933 , 162 C. C.

Robert T. Ewing, an Individual v. National Labor Relations Board

768 F.2d 51 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 19, 1985

to the Board for further reconsideration under the teaching of SEC v. … To remand the case again would not engage this Court and the Board in a “ping pong game.” NLRB v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Yale New Haven Hospital

312 F. App'x 428 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 2, 2009

SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the order of the National Labor Relations Board is MODIFIED and that the order is ENFORCED AS MODIFIED. … The National Labor Relations Board order is modified as follows: After the word “representative” in the third line of paragraph 1(b) of the order, add the following: “, except that it is permissible to tell employees that

Mei v. Board of Immigration Appeals

100 F. App'x 21 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 7, 2004

SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner Zhuohong Mei appeals from the order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying his applications for various forms of relief, including asylum and withholding of removal, and ordering Mei … Diallo v. INS, 232 F.3d 279, 287 (2d Cir.2000). Because we afford “particular deference” to the IJ’s credibility determinations, see Montero v.

Zou v. Board of Immigration Appeals

99 F. App'x 322 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 25, 2004

SUMMARY ORDER ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the *323 judgment of the Board of Immigration Appeals be and hereby is AFFIRMED. … Petitioner seeks review of the August 20, 2002, decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”).

National Labor Relations Board v. Gotham Shoe Manufacturing Co., Inc.

359 F.2d 684 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 14, 1966

National Labor Relations Board, supra; National Labor Relations Board v. Cumberland Shoe Corporation, 351 F.2d 917 (6th Cir. 1965); see National Labor Relations Board v. … See National Labor Relations Board v. Overnite Transportation Company, 308 F.2d 279, 283 (4th Cir. 1962); National Labor Relations Board v. Epstein, 203 F.2d 482 (3d Cir. 1953); Joy Silk Mills, Inc. v.

Erie-Niagara Rail Steering Committee v. Surface Transportation Board

167 F.3d 111 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 3, 1999

Simmons v. ICC, 716 F.2d 40 , 42 (D.C.Cir.1983); accord Sierra Club v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Comm’n, 825 F.2d 1356 , 1360 (9th Cir.1987); Clark & Reid Co. v. … Nor does IRR contend that it was a party to the Board’s proceedings.

National Labor Relations Board v. Oakes Machine Corp.

897 F.2d 84 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 26, 1990

See Beasley v. … See, e.g., King Radio Corp., Inc. v. NLRB, 398 F.2d 14, 21-22 (10th Cir.1968); Oil City Brass Works v.

Mrs. B. ex rel. M.M. v. Milford Board of Education

103 F.3d 1114 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 10, 1997

DISCUSSION In Board of Education v. … Polk v. Central Susquehanna Intermediate Unit 16, 853 F.2d 171, 183 (3rd Cir.1988); see also Hall v.

Socony Mobil Oil Co., Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

357 F.2d 662 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 16, 1966

And for this reason, Socony’s suspension of Haleblian was unlawful. *664 NLRB v. Park Edge Sheridan Meats, Inc., 341 F.2d 725 (2d Cir. 1965); NLRB v. … Co. v. NLRB, 116 U.S.App.D.C. 140 , 321 F.2d 753 , cert. denied, 375 U.S. 923 , 84 S.Ct. 265 , 11 L.Ed.2d 166 (1963). Therefore, on the Board’s first theory the test for review is met.

National Labor Relations Board v. Penn Cork & Closures, Inc., District Lodge No. 15 of the International Association of MacHinists Afl-Cio, Intervenor

376 F.2d 52 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 10, 1967

Brown-E. F. … Regrettable as is the Board’s continued failure to use its rule-making powers, see SEC v. Chenery Corp., 332 U.S. 194, 202 , 67 S.Ct. 1575 , 91 L.Ed. 1995 (1947); N. L. R. B. v. A. P. W.

National Labor Relations Board v. Lance Investigation Service, Inc.

680 F.2d 1 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 13, 1982

MESKILL, Circuit Judge: The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) petitions pursuant to section 10(e) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq. (1976), for enforcement of a bargaining order issued on July … The NLRB’s Regional Director rejected Lance’s claims after an investigation but without a hearing, see 29 C.F.R. § 102.69 (1981), and the Board, also without a hearing, affirmed and certified the Union.

National Labor Relations Board v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters

272 F.2d 85 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 27, 1959

Printers, John V. … Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board, 340 U.S. 474 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 ; National Labor Relations Board v. Pittsburgh Steamship Co., 340 U.S. 498 , 71 S.Ct. 453 , 95 L.Ed. 479 .

National Labor Relations Board v. A. E. Nettleton Co.

241 F.2d 130 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 21, 1957

As stated in National Labor Relations Board v. American Nat. Ins. … See also May Department Stores Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 326 U.S. 376, 383, 385 , 66 S.Ct. 203 , 90 L.Ed. 145 .