Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
4.03s
National Labor Relations Board v. Kelly Brothers Nurseries, Inc.
341 F.2d 433 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 5, 1965
The Board’s reliance on cases holding that a small percentage of annual time spent on work outside the definition of § 3(f) of the FLSA, such as our decision in Wirtz v. … NLRB v.
Cited 12 timesPublishedZheng v. Board of Immigration Appeals
142 F. App'x 529 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 26, 2005
Petitioner Lin Lin Zheng (“Zheng”), a citizen of the People’s Republic of China, petitions for review of a September 17, 2003 decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming the May 2002 decision of an Immigration … Ramsameachire v. Ashcroft, 357 F.3d 169, 177 (2d Cir.2004) (internal quotation marks omitted); see also Secaida-Rosales v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Friedman-Harry Marks Clothing Co.
83 F.2d 731 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 6, 1936
Since our rules require such transcripts to be printed, the Board procured ex parte from Judge L. … The Supreme Court in Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Co., 273 U.S. 359, 372 , 47 S.Ct. 400 , 71 L.
Cited 9 timesPublishedSingh v. Board of Immigration Appeals
140 F. App'x 334 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 29, 2005
Pro se petitioner Jasvir Singh asks this court to review an April 24, 2003 order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying Singh’s motion to reopen. … See Kaur v. BIA 413 F.3d 232, 234 (2d Cir.2005).
Cited 0 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. United Technologies Corporation
706 F.2d 1254 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 21, 1983
Lawlor v. … E.g., Armco Steel Corp. v. NLRB, 344 F.2d 621 (6th Cir.1965) (distribution); NLRB v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Enterprise Association of Steam
285 F.2d 642 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 30, 1961
285 F.2d 642 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. … In cases involving the breadth of orders of the Board, this limitation was recognized by this court in N. L. R. B. v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedTut v. Board of Immigration Appeals
139 F. App'x 310 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 13, 2005
See Kaur v. Board of Immigration Appeals, 418 F.3d 232 (2d Cir.2005) (per curiam). … Ke Zhen Zhao v. United States Dep’t of Justice, 265 F.3d 83 , 93 (2d Cir.2001) (internal citations omitted).
Cited 0 timesPublished378 F.2d 22 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 19, 1967
See, e.g., Wanner v. County School Board, 357 F.2d 452, 455 (4th Cir. 1966); Dowell v. School Board, 244 F.Supp. 971, 981 (W.D.Okl.1965). Springfield School Committee v. … Cincinnati Board of Education, 369 F.2d 55 (6th Cir. 1966); Downs v. Board of Education, 336 F.2d 988 (10th Cir. 1964), cert. denied 380 U.S. 914 , 85 S.Ct. 898 , 13 L.Ed.2d 800 (1965); Bell v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedRobert J. Simmons, II v. United States Railroad Retirement Board
982 F.2d 49 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 16, 1992
Accordingly, the Board had the burden of establishing that there was other work that Simmons could perform. See White v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 910 F.2d 64, 65 (2d Cir.1990); Rivera v. … See Harris, 948 F.2d at 126 ; Schisler v. Heckler, 787 F.2d 76, 85 (2d Cir.1986) [Schisler I]; Ferraris v. Heckler, 728 F.2d 582, 585 (2d Cir.1984). We reject the Board’s argument that Drs.
Cited 59 timesPublishedRen v. Board of Immigration Appeals
91 F. App'x 173 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 23, 2004
In reviewing the BIA’s decision, we apply the substantial evidence test to the Board’s factual findings and reverse only if no reasonable factfinder could have arrived at the same conclusion as the Board. Diallo v. … See Qiu v. Ashcroft, 329 F.3d 140, 147-48 (2d Cir.2003).
Cited 0 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Great Eastern Color Lithographic Corp.
309 F.2d 352 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 1, 1962
Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 260 F.2d 109 (8th Cir., 1958); National Labor Relations Board v. Van Deusen, 138 F.2d 893 (2d Cir., 1943). … Independent Employees Ass’n of Neptune Meter Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 158 F.2d 448 (2d Cir., 1946); Sperry Gyroscope Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 129 F.2d 922 (2d Cir., 1942). 6 .
Cited 22 timesPublishedChen v. Board of Immigration Appeals
131 F. App'x 764 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 18, 2005
SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the petition for review of the order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) entered on February 25, 2003, is hereby DENIED. … See Khouzam v. Ashcroft, 361 F.3d 161, 165 (2d Cir.2004).
Cited 0 timesPublishedHolo-Krome Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
954 F.2d 108 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 17, 1992
Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274 , 97 S.Ct. 568 , 50 L.Ed.2d 471 (1977). … See NLRB v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedRose Ann Brown v. Anginell Andrews, Superintendent of Albion Correctional Facility
220 F.3d 634 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 9, 2000
Cited 3 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Meyer Label Company, Inc.
597 F.2d 18 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 6, 1979
We must now consider whether the Board’s order ought to be enforced. II. Our authority to review Board findings is narrow. Niagara University v. NLRB, 558 F.2d 1116, 1118 (2d Cir. 1977). … Moreover, the Board’s order was arbitrary because it departed from Board precedents, the facts of which are indistinguishable from the facts present here. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedIrving Air Chute Company, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
350 F.2d 176 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 18, 1965
NLRB v. Kropp Forge Co., 178 F.2d 822, 828-829 (2d Cir. 1950). In this context the Board’s conclusions were consistent with well-established principles. … “It is for the Board not the courts to determine how the effect of prior unfair labor practices may be expunged.” International Ass’n of Machinists, etc. v. NLRB, 311 U.S., supra, at 82, 61 S.Ct. at 89; NLRB v.
Cited 59 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. United Aircraft Corp.
490 F.2d 1105 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 28, 1973
motivation. 3 NLRB v. … Citing NLRB v. Dorn’s Transportation Co., 405 F.2d 706, 714-715 (2d Cir. 1969), and J. J. Newberry Co. v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedUnited Aircraft Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board
434 F.2d 1198 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 16, 1970
But as we stated in N.L.R.B. v. … Co. v. N.L.R.B., supra, 412 F.2d at 85 .
Cited 2 timesPublishedBritish Airways Board v. Port Authority of New York
558 F.2d 75 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 14, 1977
Rep. 20 ,512 BRITISH AIRWAYS BOARD and Compagnie Nationale Air France, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. The PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK and New Jersey, William J. Ronan, W. Paul Stillman, James G. Hellmuth, Victor R. … See Douglas v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedSingh v. Board of Immigration Appeals
132 F. App'x 400 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 1, 2005
Lakhvinder Singh, a citizen of India, files this pro se petition for review of the May 23, 2003, decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”). … See Zhao v. United States Dep’t of Justice, 265 F.3d 83 , 90 (2d Cir.2001). We review the BIA’s denial of motions to reopen and motions to reconsider for abuse of discretion. See Khouzam v.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna