Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersca2

10,000+ results

4.03s

  • National Labor Relations Board v. Kelly Brothers Nurseries, Inc.

    341 F.2d 433 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 5, 1965

    The Board’s reliance on cases holding that a small percentage of annual time spent on work outside the definition of § 3(f) of the FLSA, such as our decision in Wirtz v. … NLRB v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Zheng v. Board of Immigration Appeals

    142 F. App'x 529 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 26, 2005

    Petitioner Lin Lin Zheng (“Zheng”), a citizen of the People’s Republic of China, petitions for review of a September 17, 2003 decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming the May 2002 decision of an Immigration … Ramsameachire v. Ashcroft, 357 F.3d 169, 177 (2d Cir.2004) (internal quotation marks omitted); see also Secaida-Rosales v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Friedman-Harry Marks Clothing Co.

    83 F.2d 731 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 6, 1936

    Since our rules require such transcripts to be printed, the Board procured ex parte from Judge L. … The Supreme Court in Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Co., 273 U.S. 359, 372 , 47 S.Ct. 400 , 71 L.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Singh v. Board of Immigration Appeals

    140 F. App'x 334 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 29, 2005

    Pro se petitioner Jasvir Singh asks this court to review an April 24, 2003 order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying Singh’s motion to reopen. … See Kaur v. BIA 413 F.3d 232, 234 (2d Cir.2005).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. United Technologies Corporation

    706 F.2d 1254 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 21, 1983

    Lawlor v. … E.g., Armco Steel Corp. v. NLRB, 344 F.2d 621 (6th Cir.1965) (distribution); NLRB v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Enterprise Association of Steam

    285 F.2d 642 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 30, 1961

    285 F.2d 642 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. … In cases involving the breadth of orders of the Board, this limitation was recognized by this court in N. L. R. B. v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Tut v. Board of Immigration Appeals

    139 F. App'x 310 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 13, 2005

    See Kaur v. Board of Immigration Appeals, 418 F.3d 232 (2d Cir.2005) (per curiam). … Ke Zhen Zhao v. United States Dep’t of Justice, 265 F.3d 83 , 93 (2d Cir.2001) (internal citations omitted).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Offermann v. Nitkowski

    378 F.2d 22 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 19, 1967

    See, e.g., Wanner v. County School Board, 357 F.2d 452, 455 (4th Cir. 1966); Dowell v. School Board, 244 F.Supp. 971, 981 (W.D.Okl.1965). Springfield School Committee v. … Cincinnati Board of Education, 369 F.2d 55 (6th Cir. 1966); Downs v. Board of Education, 336 F.2d 988 (10th Cir. 1964), cert. denied 380 U.S. 914 , 85 S.Ct. 898 , 13 L.Ed.2d 800 (1965); Bell v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Robert J. Simmons, II v. United States Railroad Retirement Board

    982 F.2d 49 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 16, 1992

    Accordingly, the Board had the burden of establishing that there was other work that Simmons could perform. See White v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 910 F.2d 64, 65 (2d Cir.1990); Rivera v. … See Harris, 948 F.2d at 126 ; Schisler v. Heckler, 787 F.2d 76, 85 (2d Cir.1986) [Schisler I]; Ferraris v. Heckler, 728 F.2d 582, 585 (2d Cir.1984). We reject the Board’s argument that Drs.

    Cited 59 timesPublished
  • Ren v. Board of Immigration Appeals

    91 F. App'x 173 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 23, 2004

    In reviewing the BIA’s decision, we apply the substantial evidence test to the Board’s factual findings and reverse only if no reasonable factfinder could have arrived at the same conclusion as the Board. Diallo v. … See Qiu v. Ashcroft, 329 F.3d 140, 147-48 (2d Cir.2003).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Great Eastern Color Lithographic Corp.

    309 F.2d 352 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 1, 1962

    Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 260 F.2d 109 (8th Cir., 1958); National Labor Relations Board v. Van Deusen, 138 F.2d 893 (2d Cir., 1943). … Independent Employees Ass’n of Neptune Meter Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 158 F.2d 448 (2d Cir., 1946); Sperry Gyroscope Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 129 F.2d 922 (2d Cir., 1942). 6 .

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Chen v. Board of Immigration Appeals

    131 F. App'x 764 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 18, 2005

    SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the petition for review of the order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) entered on February 25, 2003, is hereby DENIED. … See Khouzam v. Ashcroft, 361 F.3d 161, 165 (2d Cir.2004).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Holo-Krome Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

    954 F.2d 108 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 17, 1992

    Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274 , 97 S.Ct. 568 , 50 L.Ed.2d 471 (1977). … See NLRB v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Rose Ann Brown v. Anginell Andrews, Superintendent of Albion Correctional Facility

    220 F.3d 634 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 9, 2000

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Meyer Label Company, Inc.

    597 F.2d 18 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 6, 1979

    We must now consider whether the Board’s order ought to be enforced. II. Our authority to review Board findings is narrow. Niagara University v. NLRB, 558 F.2d 1116, 1118 (2d Cir. 1977). … Moreover, the Board’s order was arbitrary because it departed from Board precedents, the facts of which are indistinguishable from the facts present here. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Irving Air Chute Company, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    350 F.2d 176 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 18, 1965

    NLRB v. Kropp Forge Co., 178 F.2d 822, 828-829 (2d Cir. 1950). In this context the Board’s conclusions were consistent with well-established principles. … “It is for the Board not the courts to determine how the effect of prior unfair labor practices may be expunged.” International Ass’n of Machinists, etc. v. NLRB, 311 U.S., supra, at 82, 61 S.Ct. at 89; NLRB v.

    Cited 59 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. United Aircraft Corp.

    490 F.2d 1105 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 28, 1973

    motivation. 3 NLRB v. … Citing NLRB v. Dorn’s Transportation Co., 405 F.2d 706, 714-715 (2d Cir. 1969), and J. J. Newberry Co. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • United Aircraft Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board

    434 F.2d 1198 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 16, 1970

    But as we stated in N.L.R.B. v. … Co. v. N.L.R.B., supra, 412 F.2d at 85 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • British Airways Board v. Port Authority of New York

    558 F.2d 75 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 14, 1977

    Rep. 20 ,512 BRITISH AIRWAYS BOARD and Compagnie Nationale Air France, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. The PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK and New Jersey, William J. Ronan, W. Paul Stillman, James G. Hellmuth, Victor R. … See Douglas v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Singh v. Board of Immigration Appeals

    132 F. App'x 400 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 1, 2005

    Lakhvinder Singh, a citizen of India, files this pro se petition for review of the May 23, 2003, decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”). … See Zhao v. United States Dep’t of Justice, 265 F.3d 83 , 90 (2d Cir.2001). We review the BIA’s denial of motions to reopen and motions to reconsider for abuse of discretion. See Khouzam v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.