Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersca2

10,000+ results

4.76s

  • National Labor Relations Board v. Cadillac Wire Corp.

    290 F.2d 261 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 10, 1961

    290 F.2d 261 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. … Brown, Jr., Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D. C., for the Board. Sol E. King, New York City, for the Cadillac Corporation.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Suffield Academy

    322 F.3d 196 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 28, 2003

    In affirming this decision, the majority of the Board relied upon Driftwood Convalescent Hosp., 312 NLRB 247 , 252 (1993), enforced sub nom. NLRB v. Valley W. Health Care, 67 F.3d 307 (9th Cir.1995). … Co. v. NLRB, 495 F.2d 44, 48 (2d Cir.1974). We must uphold the Board’s finding that the Academy negotiated in bad faith so long as substantial evidence in the record supports it. TNT USA, Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Beech-Nut Life Savers, Inc.

    406 F.2d 253 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 3, 1968

    E. g., NLRB v. Rohlen, supra; NLRB v. Hanes Hosiery Division, Hanes Corp., supra; Excelsior Underwear, Inc., supra. The district court’s enforcement of the Board-issued subpoena was entirely proper. … Over the years a great many rules have been formulated and applied by the Board in its quasi-judicial proceedings. E. g., Brooks v. NLRB, 348 U.S. 96 , 75 S.Ct. 176 , 99 L.Ed. 125 (1954); NLRB v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Singh v. Board of Immigration Appeals

    174 F. App'x 629 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 31, 2006

    See Zhao v. U.S. … Malvoisin v. INS, 268 F.3d 74, 75 (2d Cir.2001) (thirty-day time limit is mandatory).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Publishers' Ass'n of New York City v. National Labor Relations Board

    364 F.2d 293 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 25, 1966

    The arguments against the Board’s position are forcefully stated by Member Brown dissenting in both Evening News Association and in this case. … Int’l Union, 361 U.S. 477 , 80 S.Ct. 419 , 4 L.Ed.2d 454 (1960); NLRB v. Brown et al., 380 U.S. 278 , 85 S.Ct. 980 , 13 L.Ed.2d 839 (1965); American Ship Building Co. v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Rani v. Board of Immigration Appeals

    177 F. App'x 112 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 17, 2006

    See Kaur v. BIA, 413 F.3d 232, 233 (2d Cir.2005) (per curiam). … has acted in an arbitrary or capricious manner.’ ” Id. at 233-34 (quoting Ke Zhen Zhao v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. American White Cross Laboratories, Inc.

    160 F.2d 75 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 19, 1947

    We think this holding correct, in the light of Wallace Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board, 323 U.S. 248 , 65 S.Ct. 238 , 89 L.Ed. 216 . Cf. Local No. 2880 v. N. L. R. B., 9 Cir., 158 F.2d 365 . … Ct. 238 , 89 L.Ed. 216 . 4 Moreover, as this objection was not made before the Board, it cannot be considered by us. N. L. R. B. v., Cheney Cal. Lumber Co., 327 U.S. 385 , 66 S.Ct. 553 .

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • John E. HARRIS, Petitioner, v. RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD, Respondent

    948 F.2d 123 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 4, 1991

    See, e.g., Poole v. Railroad Retirement Board, 905 F.2d 654, 661 (2d Cir.1990); Aspros v. Railroad Retirement Board, 904 F.2d 384 (7th Cir.1990); Romaker v. Railroad Retirement Board, 733 F.2d 639 (8th Cir.1984). … See Rivera v. Schweiker, 717 F.2d 719, 723 (2d Cir.1983); Gibson v. Heckler, 779 F.2d 619, 622 (11th Cir.1986).

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • United Aircraft Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

    434 F.2d 1198 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 16, 1970

    But as we stated in N.L.R.B. v. … Co. v. N.L.R.B., supra, 412 F.2d at 85 . V.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Black Diamond S. S. Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

    94 F.2d 875 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 14, 1938

    This is in accord with what was decided in Jeffery-De Witt Insulator Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 4 Cir., 91 F.2d 134, 136 , 112 A.L.R. 948 . … As we have said in the opinion in-National Labor Relations Board v.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Plaka v. Board of Immigration Appeals

    139 F. App'x 334 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 20, 2005

    . § 1101 (a)(42); Zhou Yun Zhang v. INS, 386 F.3d 66, 70 (2d Cir .2004). … See Fatin v. INS, 12 F.3d 1233 , 1240 & n. 10 (2d Cir. 1993).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Zinnamon v. NYC Department of Education/Board of Education

    377 F. App'x 42 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 13, 2010

    See Zinnamon v. N.Y.C. Dep’t of Educ., No. 08-CV-1399 (E.D.N.Y. Oct.8, 2008). Finding no merit in Zinnamon’s remaining arguments, we hereby AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • HarperCollins San Francisco v. National Labor Relations Board

    79 F.3d 1324 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 26, 1996

    Brown Meeting Manager Carol Brown met with employees Julie Wunderlich and Kathryn Bader and asked them what they hoped a union would achieve. … Our review of the Board’s findings that an employer has committed unfair labor practices is quite limited. See J.L.M., Inc. v. *1329 NLRB, 31 F.3d 79 , 82 (2d Cir.1994).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Israel Putnam Mills, Inc.

    197 F.2d 116 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 29, 1952

    See Rapid Roller Co. v. National L. Relations Board, 7 Cir., 126 F.2d 452, 459 , certiorari denied 317 U.S. 650 , 63 S.Ct. 45 , 87 L.Ed. 523 ; National L. Relations Board v. George P. … Relations Board v. Westinghouse Air Brake Co., 3 Cir., 120 F.2d 1004, 1006 .

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Vanguard Tours, Inc.

    981 F.2d 62 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 2, 1992

    But the Board determined that leaving the suit pending for eight days after January 15 — after the strike had ended — constituted an unfair labor practice. In Bill Johnson’s Restaurants, Inc. v. … Because of the likely chilling effect of such a rule, the Board may conclude that the rule was an unfair labor practice even absent evidence of enforcement. See Republic Aviation Corp. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Singh v. Board of Immigration Appeals

    138 F. App'x 353 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 29, 2005

    Singh appealed to the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”), which on August 13, 2003, affirmed. See Matter of Balwinder Singh, No. A 79 299 267—New York (BIA Aug. 13, 2003) (hereinafter “Matter of Singh —BIA”). … See, e.g., Norton v. Sam’s Club, 145 F.3d 114, 117 (2d Cir.1998).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Mascoll v. N.Y.C. Board of Education

    126 F. App'x 497 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 2, 2005

    . § 2000e et seq., against the New York City Board of Education (“BOE”), where plaintiff Janet Mascoll worked from September 1997 until her termination in June 1998. … See Chambers v. TRM Copy Centers Corp., 43 F.3d 29, 38 (2d Cir.1994) (“[Rejection of the defendant’s proffered reasons!

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • P.J. ex rel. W.J. v. CT Board of Ed.

    550 F. App'x 20 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 23, 2013

    Nos. 686, 706; see also Joseph A. by Wolfe v. … Music, Inc. v. DMX Inc., 688 F.3d 32, 43 (2d Cir.2012).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Singh v. Board of Immigration Appeals

    164 F. App'x 142 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 30, 2006

    UPON DUE CONSIDERATION of this petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decision, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the petition for review is DENIED. … In Re O-D-, 21 I & N Dec. 1079, 1083 , 1998 WL 24904 (BIA 1998) ; Bropleh v. Gonzales, 428 F.3d 772, 776 (8th Cir.2005); Selami v. Gonzales, 423 F.3d 621, 625 (6th Cir.2005); Yongo v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Javed v. Board of Immigration Appeals

    151 F. App'x 58 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 11, 2005

    See Malvoisin v. … See Kaur v. BIA, 413 F.3d 232, 233 (2d Cir.2005) (per curiam); Khouzam v. Ashcroft, 361 F.3d 161, 165 (2d Cir.2004).

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.