Case law

National Labor Relations Board v. Millfay Manufacturing Co.

97 F.2d 1009 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 13, 1938

Ianni v. New York City Board of Education

614 F.2d 1287 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 26, 1979

614 F.2d 1287 Ianni v. New York City Board of Education No. 79-7409 United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit 11/26/79 1 E.D.N.Y. AFFIRMED

Itzcovitz v. Selective Service Local Board Number 6

422 F.2d 828 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 2, 1970

National Labor Relations Board v. Stratford Lithographers, Inc.

423 F.2d 1219 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 1, 1970

There was also substantial evidence to support the Board’s finding that the union represented a majority of the employees in the appropriate unit. … We see no proper reason to set aside the Board’s determination that under the circumstances a bargaining order was necessary. Enforcement granted.

New York Board of Fire Underwriters v. Moody

111 F. 1006 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 14, 1901

National Labor Relations Board v. Triboro Carting Corporation

251 F.2d 959 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 7, 1958

251 F.2d 959 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. … On Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Jerome D. Fenton, Gen. Counsel, Stephen Leonard, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Frederick U.

National Labor Relations Board v. Vanguard Tours, Inc.

981 F.2d 62 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 2, 1992

(BNA) 2041 , 61 USLW 2420 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. … Because of the likely chilling effect of such a rule, the Board may conclude that the rule was an unfair labor practice even absent evidence of enforcement. See Republic Aviation Corp. v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Friedman-Harry Marks Clothing Co.

83 F.2d 731 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 6, 1936

Since our rules require such transcripts to be printed, the Board procured ex parte from Judge L. … The Supreme Court in Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Co., 273 U.S. 359, 372 , 47 S.Ct. 400 , 71 L.

Snyder Tank Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

428 F.2d 1348 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 1, 1970

These factual findings, supported by substantial evidence outlined above, are sufficient to warrant the Board’s conclusion that the company violated § 8(a) (1). See, e. g., NLRB v. … NLRB v. Gissel Packing Co., 395 U.S. at 606 , 89 S.Ct. at 1936 . The cards were clear on their face; and the trial examiner and the Board resolved what conflicting testimony there was against the company.

Royal Coach Lines, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

838 F.2d 47 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 27, 1988

NLRB v. … NLRB v.

Lama v. Board of Immigration Appeals

177 F. App'x 131 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 19, 2006

As an initial matter, it is HEREBY ORDERED that the pending motion to consolidate the petitions for review in Lama v. Board of Immigration Appeals, No. 03-4833-ag, and Lama v. … Board of Immigration Appeals, No. 05-4306, is GRANTED. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (b)(6).

Rani v. Board of Immigration Appeals

177 F. App'x 112 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 17, 2006

See Kaur v. BIA, 413 F.3d 232, 233 (2d Cir.2005) (per curiam). … has acted in an arbitrary or capricious manner.’ ” Id. at 233-34 (quoting Ke Zhen Zhao v.

Singh v. Board of Immigration Appeals

175 F. App'x 481 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 11, 2006

See Kaur v. BIA, 413 F.3d 232, 233 (2d Cir.2005) (per curiam); Khouzam v. Ashcroft, 361 F.3d 161, 165 (2d. Cir.2004). … found where the BIA’s decision “provides no rational explanation, inexplicably departs from established policies, is devoid of any reasoning, or contains only summary or conclusory statements; that is to say, where the Board

National Labor Relations Board v. Enterprise Association of Steam

285 F.2d 642 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 30, 1961

285 F.2d 642 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. … In cases involving the breadth of orders of the Board, this limitation was recognized by this court in N. L. R. B. v.

Publishers' Ass'n of New York City v. National Labor Relations Board

364 F.2d 293 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 25, 1966

The arguments against the Board’s position are forcefully stated by Member Brown dissenting in both Evening News Association and in this case. … Int’l Union, 361 U.S. 477 , 80 S.Ct. 419 , 4 L.Ed.2d 454 (1960); NLRB v. Brown et al., 380 U.S. 278 , 85 S.Ct. 980 , 13 L.Ed.2d 839 (1965); American Ship Building Co. v.

Brown v. Vitucci

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 17, 2023

22-1070-cv Brown v. … Mara v. Rilling, 921 F.3d 48, 69 (2d Cir. 2019) (quoting Texas v. Brown, 460 U.S. 730, 742 (1983)).

Irving Air Chute Company, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

350 F.2d 176 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 18, 1965

NLRB v. Kropp Forge Co., 178 F.2d 822, 828-829 (2d Cir. 1950). In this context the Board’s conclusions were consistent with well-established principles. … “It is for the Board not the courts to determine how the effect of prior unfair labor practices may be expunged.” International Ass’n of Machinists, etc. v. NLRB, 311 U.S., supra, at 82, 61 S.Ct. at 89; NLRB v.

Singh v. Board of Immigration Appeals

175 F. App'x 499 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 8, 2006

Secaida-Rosales v. INS, 331 F.3d 297, 307 (2d Cir.2003). … See Yueqing Zhang v. Gonzales, 426 F.3d 540 , 542 n. 1 (2d Cir.2005). For the foregoing reasons, the petition for review is DENIED. The stay of removal that the Court previously granted in this petition is VACATED.

National Labor Relations Board v. Ra-Rich Manufacturing Corporation

276 F.2d 451 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 23, 1960

Subsequent to the Board’s original decision and order, respondent moved the Board to reopen the record, asserting that under this Court’s decision in N.L.R.B. v. … No extraordinary circumstances are present here and in their absence the Court may not consider objections not raised before the Board. N.L.R.B. v.

Yong v. Board of Immigration Appeals

177 F. App'x 124 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 18, 2006

See Kaur v. BIA, 413 F.3d 232, 233 (2d Cir.2005) (per curiam); Jin Ming Liu v. Gonzales, 439 F.3d 109, 111 (2d Cir.2006). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts and procedural history of the case. … See INS v.