Case law

Ruane v. New York State Racing & Wagering Board

532 F.2d 860 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 29, 1976

After a full evidentiary hearing, the Stewards’ action was upheld by the State Racing and Wagering Board. … Lopez, 419 U.S. 565, 573 , 95 S.Ct. 729, 736 , 42 L.Ed.2d 725, 733 (1975); Board of Regents v.

Eugene T. King, Jr. v. John R. Simpson, Eastern Regional Commissioner, United States Parole Commission

189 F.3d 284 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 20, 1999

See generally, 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (b); FDIC v. Meyer, 510 U.S. 471, 477-78 , 114 S.Ct. 996 , 127 L.Ed.2d 308 (1994); Chen v. … See 28 C.F.R. § 2.12 (d) (1998); see also Green v.

Finkel v. New York City Board of Education

622 F.2d 573 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 3, 1980

622 F.2d 573 Finkel v. New York City Board of Education 79-7629 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Second Circuit 3/3/80 E.D.N.Y., 474 F.Supp. 468 AFFIRMED

Jian Rong Xiao v. Board of Immigration Appeals

213 F. App'x 38 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 11, 2007

Cao He Lin v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice, 428 F.3d 391, 406 (2d Cir.2005); Tian-Yong Chen v. INS, 359 F.3d 121, 129 (2d Cir.2004); see also Xiao Ji Chen v. U.S. … See Latifi v. Gonzales, 430 F.3d 103, 105 (2d Cir.2005); Ming Shi Xue v. BIA, 439 F.3d 111, 124-25 (2d Cir.2006).

Koppell v. New York State Board of Elections

153 F.3d 95 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 28, 1998

Jolly v. Coughlin, 76 F.3d 468, 473 (2d Cir.1996) (quoting Tom Doherty As socs. v. Saban Entertainment, Inc., 60 F.3d 27, 33-34 (2d Cir.1995)). … See Board of Election Comm’rs v. Libertarian Party, 591 F.2d 22, 27 (7th Cir.1979) (all that is required is that the procedure “be neutral in character”).

Singh v. Board of Immigration Appeals

190 F. App'x 95 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 1, 2006

See Jin Ming Liu v. Gonzales, 439 F.3d 109, 111 (2d Cir.2006) (per curiam); Kaur v. BIA, 413 F.3d 232, 233 (2d Cir. 2005) (per curiam). … INS v.

Lihli Fashions Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

80 F.3d 743 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 2, 1996

Co. v. NLRB, 778 F.2d 132 , 137 (2d Cir.1985) (quoting NLRB v. Browning-Ferris Indus., Inc., 691 F.2d 1117, 1122 (3d Cir.1982)), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 814 , 107 S.Ct. 67 , 93 L.Ed.2d 25 (1986). … .”); Stardyne, Inc. v.

In Re St. Lawrence Condensed Milk Corporation

9 F.2d 896 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 2, 1925

Slaughter, who with Caldwell comprised a majority of the board of directors of the Brown & Bailey Condensed Milk Company, and also on behalf of Walsh, Slaughter, and Henry I. … Teal v. Walker, 111 U. S. 242 , 4 S. Ct. 420 , 28 L. Ed. 415 ; In re Jones (D. C.) 209 F. 717 .

Kareemi v. Board of Immigration Appeals

190 F. App'x 61 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 20, 2006

See Mu-Xing Wang v. Ashcroft, 820 F.3d 130, 144 (2d Cir.2003). All relevant evidence must be considered in deciding a petitioner’s CAT claim. Ramsameachire v. Ashcroft, 357 F.3d 169, 184 (2d Cir. 2004). … . § 208.18 (a)(1); Khouzam, v. Ashcroft, 361 F.3d 161, 168 (2d Cir.2004) (emphasis added).

Marshall v. NYC Board of Elections

322 F. App'x 17 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 7, 2009

SUMMARY ORDER Appellant Valorie Marshall, pro se, appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment dismissing her claims against the New York City Board of Elections (“BOE”) of race, sex, and religious discrimination … See, e.g., Kessler v. Westchester County Dep’t of Soc.

National Labor Relations Board v. Mt. Sinai Hospital

8 F. App'x 111 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 17, 2001

Schnurmacher, 214 F.3d at 264 (citing NLRB v. Health Care & Retirement Corp. of Am., 511 U.S. 571, 573-74 , 114 S.Ct. 1778 , 128 L.Ed.2d 586 (1994)). The Board found, and Mt. … See NLRB v.

Martire v. Selective Service Local Board No. 15

467 F.2d 893 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 27, 1972

Naskiewicz v. Lawver, 2 Cir., 456 F.2d 1166, 1168 (1972). Plaintiff therefore relies on the finding below that Dr. … Although plaintiff contends that this test was not properly administered, the board’s conduct of those duties requiring the exercise of its discretion is not reviewable prior to induction. Fein v.

Brooks v. Board of Immigration Appeals

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 17, 2010

09-3805 Brooks v. … Blake, 481 F.3d at 156; see also Sutherland v.

Singh v. Board of Immigration Appeals

184 F. App'x 78 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 2, 2006

. § 1252 (b)(4)(B); Jin Hui Gao v. United States Att’y Gen., 400 F.3d 963, 964 (2d Cir.2005); Zhou Yun Zhang v. INS, 386 F.3d 66, 73-79 (2d Cir.2004); Ramsameachire v. … See Wu Biao Chen v. INS, 344 F.3d 272, 275 (2d Cir.2003).

Singh v. Board of Immigration Appeals

182 F. App'x 55 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 25, 2006

See Ke Zhen Zhao v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice, 265 F.3d 83 , 93 (2d Cir.2001). … See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (c)(1); INS v. Abudu, 485 U.S. 94, 104-05 , 108 S.Ct. 904 , 99 L.Ed.2d 90 (1988).

Singh v. Board of Immigration Appeals

180 F. App'x 290 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 16, 2006

Zheng Zhong Chen v. Gonzales, 437 F.3d 267, 269 (2d Cir.2006) (per curiam). … found where the BIA’s decision “provides no rational explanation, inexplicably departs from established policies, is devoid of any reasoning, or contains only summary or eonclusory statements; that is to say, where the Board

Tafani v. Board of Immigration Appeals

185 F. App'x 20 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 26, 2006

See Kaur v. BIA 413 F.3d 232, 233 (2d Cir.2005) (per curiam). … found where the agency’s decision “provides no rational explanation, inexplicably departs from established policies, is devoid of any reasoning, or contains only summary or conclusory statements; that is to say, where the Board

National Labor Relations Board v. United Aircraft Corp.

490 F.2d 1105 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 28, 1973

motivation. 3 NLRB v. … Citing NLRB v. Dorn's Transportation Co., 405 F.2d 706, 714-715 (2d Cir. 1969), and J. J. Newberry Co. v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Eastern Footwear Corp.

112 F.2d 716 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 17, 1940

Its brief does not question that an enforcement order should be entered, but asks elimination of paragraphs 2 (b) and 2 (c) of the Board’s order. … urged by the respondent, but withdrew its consent because the respondent delayed its acceptance of the proposal until after the Board’s brief in this court had been printed.

Mak-All Manufacturing, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

331 F.2d 404 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 1, 1964

This is a petition to review and set aside an order of the National Labor Relations Board, to which the Board has responded with a cross-petition seeking enforcement. … Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951).