Case law

Kaur v. Board of Immigration Appeals

201 F. App'x 68 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 20, 2006

See Kaur v. BIA 413 F.3d 232, 233 (2d Cir.2005) (per curiam). … See Jian, Huan Guan v. BIA 345 F.3d 47, 49 (2d Cir.2003) (per curiam); see also Yong Zheng v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice, 416 F.3d 129, 130 (2d Cir.2005) (per curiam).

Ahmed v. Board of Immigration Appeals

189 F. App'x 50 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 27, 2006

See Yu Yin Yang v. Gonzales, 431 F.3d 84, 85 (2d Cir.2005); Yan Chen v. Gonzales, 417 F.3d 268, 271 (2d Cir.2005). … See Diallo v. I.N.S., 232 F.3d 279, 285, 288-89 (2d Cir.2000).

George Arthur v. Ewald P. Nyquist, and Eugene T. Reville

547 F.2d 7 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 8, 1976

Brown v. Board of Education, 349 U.S. 294 , 75 S.Ct. 753 , 99 L.Ed. 1083 (1955). … Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954) and Brown v. Board of Education, supra, which seems to indicate that multiple appeals are the rule rather than the exception.

National Labor Relations Board v. Century Projector Corp.

141 F.2d 488 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 21, 1944

The Board’s order directed the employer to reinstate three employees, and to recognize a C. I. O. local in its plant as the accredited bargaining representative of an “appropriate unit.” … We have repeatedly held, following the Supreme Court,' that, as to the effect upon the will of employees of such indications of an employer’s preference, the Board’s word is final. National Labor Relations Board v.

Smakaj v. Board of Immigration Appeals

321 F. App'x 88 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 15, 2009

See Mei Chai Ye v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice, 489 F.3d 517, 523 (2d Cir.2007). … . § 1252 (b)(4)(B); see also Corovic v. Mukasey, 519 F.3d 90, 95 (2d Cir.2008).

Woods v. Rondout Valley Central School District Board of Education

466 F.3d 232 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 10, 2006

Healthy City School District Board of Education v. … In support of its argument, the Board emphasizes Lanza v.

Ohuche v. New York City Board of Education

161 F. App'x 68 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 23, 2005

See Pikulin v. City Univ. of N.Y., 176 F.3d 598, 599 (2d Cir.1999) (per curiam) (citing 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(e)(1)). … The statute of limitations for an unlawful employment practice has been held as beginning to run when the unlawful practice occurs, see Forsyth v.

Marshall v. NYC Board of Elections

322 F. App'x 17 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 7, 2009

SUMMARY ORDER Appellant Valorie Marshall, pro se, appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment dismissing her claims against the New York City Board of Elections (“BOE”) of race, sex, and religious discrimination … See, e.g., Kessler v. Westchester County Dep’t of Soc.

Brown v. Ionescu

380 F. App'x 71 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 7, 2010

09-3628-pr Brown v. … .”); Matarese v.

Singh v. Board of Immigration Appeals

190 F. App'x 54 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 14, 2006

Twum v. INS, 411 F.3d 54, 58 (2d Cir. 2005). … found where the BIA’s decision “provides no rational explanation, inexplicably departs from established policies, is devoid of any reasoning, or contains only summary or conclusory statements; that is to say, where the Board

Operative Plasterers v. Board of Trustees

888 F.2d 1376 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 3, 1989

888 F.2d 1376 Operative Plasterers v. Board of Trustees NO. 89-7448 United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. OCT 03, 1989 Appeal From: E.D.N.Y., 710 F.Supp. 42 1 DISMISSED.

Kaur v. Board of Immigration Appeals

197 F. App'x 30 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 30, 2006

See Kaur v. BIA 413 F.3d 232, 233 (2d Cir.2005) (per curiam). This Court reviews the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen or reconsider for abuse of discretion. See Kaur, 413 F.3d at 233 ; Jin Ming Liu v. … found where the BIA’s decision “provides no rational explanation, inexplicably departs from established policies, is devoid of any reasoning, or contains only summary or conclusory statements; that is to say, where the Board

National Labor Relations Board v. Miranda Fuel Co.

284 F.2d 861 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 28, 1960

In Local 553, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America v. N. L. R. … B. v.

Yuan v. Board of Immigration Appeals

214 F. App'x 27 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 17, 2007

See Yan Chen v. Gonzales, 417 F.3d 268, 271 (2d Cir.2005). This Court reviews the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen for abuse of discretion. See Jin Ming Liu v. Gonzales, 439 F.3d 109, 111 (2d Cir.2006). … found where the BIA’s decision “provides no rational explanation, inexplicably departs from established policies, is devoid of any reasoning, or contains only summary or conclusory statements; that is to say, where the Board

Shah v. Board of Immigration Appeals

314 F. App'x 326 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 18, 2008

See Dong Gao v. BIA, 482 F.3d 122, 125 (2d Cir. 2007). … See Cao He Lin v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice, 428 F.3d 391, 406 (2d Cir.2005). *327 Questions of law and the application of law to undisputed fact are reviewed de novo. See Secaido-Rosales v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Hendel Manufacturing Company, Inc.

483 F.2d 350 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 14, 1973

Bourne v. NLRB, 332 F.2d 47 (2nd Cir., 1964); NLRB v. Dorn’s Transportation Co., 405 F.2d 706 (2nd Cir., 1969); NLRB v. Gladding Keystone Corp., 435 F.2d 129 (2nd Cir., 1970). … In that critical sense, the present case is distinguishable from NLRB v.

Smakaj v. Board of Immigration Appeals

321 F. App'x 88 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 15, 2009

See Mei Chai Ye v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice, 489 F.3d 517, 523 (2d Cir.2007). … . § 1252 (b)(4)(B); see also Corovic v. Mukasey, 519 F.3d 90, 95 (2d Cir.2008).

Wisniewski v. Board of Educ. of Weedsport Cent. School Dist.

494 F.3d 34 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 5, 2007

Graham v. … Porter v.

Kaur v. Board of Immigration Appeals

208 F. App'x 17 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 6, 2006

Twum v. INS, 411 F.3d 54, 58 (2d Cir.2005). … Ke Zhen Zhao v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice, 265 F.3d 83 , 93 (2d Cir. 2001) (internal citations omitted).

Guo Hua Zhang v. Board of Immigration Appeals

165 F. App'x 12 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 10, 2006

See Secaida-Rosales v. INS, 331 F.3d 297, 307 (2d Cir.2003) (stating the IJ must provide “specific, cogent” reasons for rejecting an applicant’s testimony); Cao He Lin v. U.S. … See Jin Shui Qiu v. Ashcroft, 329 *14 F.3d 140, 153 (2d Cir.2003).