Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.70s
National Labor Relations Board v. Elvine Knitting Mills, Inc.
138 F.2d 633 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 26, 1943
In a supplemental brief respondent asserted that the Board’s petition was barred by reason of a statute passed after the petition was filed in this court. … More broadly still it asserts that such a claim is not within our powers of review, under § 10(e) of the Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 160 (e), or one that respondent may raise, under Alabama Power Co. v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedJian Rong Xiao v. Board of Immigration Appeals
213 F. App'x 38 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 11, 2007
Cao He Lin v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice, 428 F.3d 391, 406 (2d Cir.2005); Tian-Yong Chen v. INS, 359 F.3d 121, 129 (2d Cir.2004); see also Xiao Ji Chen v. U.S. … See Latifi v. Gonzales, 430 F.3d 103, 105 (2d Cir.2005); Ming Shi Xue v. BIA, 439 F.3d 111, 124-25 (2d Cir.2006).
Cited 1 timesPublishedByrne Dairy, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
431 F.2d 1363 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 9, 1970
A majority of the Board’s three-man panel, affirming the trial examiner, found precisely that. … We must uphold the Board when, as here, there is a fair basis for concluding the employer had crossed the line and seriously impaired the likelihood of a fair election. See Note, NLRB v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Local No. 1261
222 F.2d 542 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 20, 1955
The record as a whole supports the Board’s conclusions that the alleged .agreement existed and was enforced in ■ order to “encourage or discourage membership in a labor organization.” … Universal Camera Corp. v. N. L. R. B., 340 U.S. 474 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 ; National Labor Relations Board v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedSimeonov v. Board of Immigration Appeals
235 F. App'x 760 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 7, 2007
See Islami v. Gonzales, 412 F.3d 391, 397-98 (2d Cir.2005). … See Li Yong Cao v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCoto v. New York City Board of Elections
101 F.3d 803 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 8, 1996
As explained in the companion opinion Gold v. … See Coto v. New York City Bd. of Elections, 97 F.3d 680 (2d Cir.1996).
Cited 1 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 1, 2026
See Choh v. Brown University, 753 F. Supp. 3d 117, 137 (D. Conn. 2024). … Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 325–26 (1962). Our conclusion is bolstered by the Supreme Court’s reasoning in National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) v. Alston, 594 U.S. 69 (2021).
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Bridgeport Ambulance Service
966 F.2d 725 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 10, 1992
See NLRB v. A. … An employer’s motivation is a factual question committed in the first instance to the Board. United Aircraft Corp. v. NLRB, 440 F.2d 85, 91-92 (2d Cir.1971).
Cited 6 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Pratt, Read & Co., Inc
191 F.2d 1006 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 2, 1951
See American Communications Ass’n v. Douds, 339 U.S. 382, 385-386 , 70 S.Ct. 674 , 94 L.Ed. 925 ; Developments in the Law — The Taft-Hartley Act, 64 Harv.L.Rev. 781, 793. … For the foregoing reasons the order of the Board should be enforced. Enforcement granted.
Cited 4 timesPublishedAli v. Board of Immigration Appeals
199 F. App'x 78 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 3, 2006
SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION of this petition for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”), it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED, that the petition for review is DENIED. … See, e.g., Twum v. INS, 411 F.3d 54, 59 (2d Cir.2005); Yu Sheng Zhang v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice, 362 F.3d 155, 159 (2d Cir.2004).
Cited 0 timesPublishedSingh v. Board of Immigration Appeals
201 F. App'x 51 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 19, 2006
Cao He Lin v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice, 428 F.3d 391, 395, 406 (2d Cir.2005); TianYong Chen v. INS, 359 F.3d 121, 129 (2d Cir.2004); see also Xiao Ji Chen v. U.S. … See Diallo v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDervishi ex rel. T.D. v. Stamford Board of Education
691 F. App'x 651 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 6, 2016
Polera v. Bd. of Educ., 288 F.3d 478, 481 (2d Cir. 2002). Here, the district court properly dismissed Dervishi’s claims as unex-hausted. … Cave v. E. Meadow Union Free Sch. Dist., 514 F.3d 240, 245 (2d Cir. 2008) (citing 20 U.S.C. § 1415 (i)(2)(A)).
Cited 1 timesPublishedSingh v. Board of Immigration Appeals
230 F. App'x 47 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 3, 2007
SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner Jeet Singh, a native and citizen of India, seeks review of a February 28, 2006 order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming the November 1, 2004 decision of Immigration Judge (“IJ”) … See Paul v. Gonzales, 444 F.3d 148, 156 (2d Cir.2006). Singh has failed to present any meaningful challenge to the denial of his CAT claim. Accordingly, the petitioner waived his CAT claim. See Mirzoyan v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedSingh v. Board of Immigration Appeals
203 F. App'x 346 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 10, 2006
Yan Chen v. Gonzales, 417 F.3d 268, 271 (2d Cir.2005). This court reviews the agency’s factual findings, including adverse credibility findings, under the substantial evidence standard. Xiao Ji Chen v. U.S. … See 8 C.F.R. § 208.16 (b); Is lami v. Gonzales, 412 F.3d 391, 395 (2d Cir.2005).
Cited 0 timesPublishedSingh v. Board of Immigration Appeals
184 F. App'x 78 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 2, 2006
. § 1252 (b)(4)(B); Jin Hui Gao v. United States Att’y Gen., 400 F.3d 963, 964 (2d Cir.2005); Zhou Yun Zhang v. INS, 386 F.3d 66, 73-79 (2d Cir.2004); Ramsameachire v. … See Wu Biao Chen v. INS, 344 F.3d 272, 275 (2d Cir.2003).
Cited 0 timesPublishedEDRO Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board
650 F. App'x 789 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 31, 2016
“Factual findings of the Board will not be disturbed if they are supported by substantial evidence in light of the record as a whole.” N.L.R.B. v. Starbucks Corp., 679 F.3d 70, 77 (2d Cir. 2012) (quoting N.L.R.B. v. … Further, the Board “has ‘broad discretion’ in fashioning remedial orders.” Mohave Elec. Co-op., Inc. v. N.L.R.B., 206 F.3d 1183, 1192 (D.C. Cir. 2000) (quoting ABF Freight System, Inc. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. New York Telephone Company
930 F.2d 1009 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 16, 1991
NLRB v. Acme Industrial Co., 385 U.S. 432, 435-36 , 87 S.Ct. 565, 567-68 , 17 L.Ed.2d 495 (1967). … E.g., Olivetti Office U.S.A., Inc. v. NLRB, 926 F.2d 181 , 187 (2d Cir.1991); NLRB v. United Technologies Corp., 884 F.2d 1569 , 1575 (2d Cir.1989); Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. v.
Cited 25 timesPublishedSahibjan v. Board of Immigration Appeals
200 F. App'x 42 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 6, 2006
See, e.g., Chun Gao v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 122, 124 (2d Cir.2005); Secaida-Rosales v. INS, 331 F.3d 297, 305 (2d Cir.2003). … Iavorski v. INS, 232 F.3d 124, 128 (2d Cir.2000).
Cited 0 timesPublishedMannion v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.
9 F.2d 894 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 9, 1925
R. v. Johnson, 264 U. S. 375 , 44 S. Ct. 391 , 68 L. Ed. 748 . … Shepard v. Adams, 168 U. S. 618 , 18 S. Ct. 214 , 42 L. Ed. 402 ; Boston & Me. R. v. Gokey, 210 U. S. 155 , 28 S. Ct. 657 , 52 L. Ed. 1002 .
Cited 2 timesPublishedSingh v. Board of Immigration Appeals
182 F. App'x 55 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 25, 2006
See Ke Zhen Zhao v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice, 265 F.3d 83 , 93 (2d Cir.2001). … See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (c)(1); INS v. Abudu, 485 U.S. 94, 104-05 , 108 S.Ct. 904 , 99 L.Ed.2d 90 (1988).
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna