Case law

Singh v. Board of Immigration Appeals

237 F. App'x 709 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 14, 2007

Jigme Wangchuck v. DHS, 448 F.3d 524, 528 (2d Cir.2006). … See Steevenez v. Gonzales, 476 F.3d 114 (2d Cir.2007). Finally, we deem any challenge to the denial of Singh’s applica *711 tion for CAT relief to be waived, as he does not raise that issue before us. Yueqing Zhang v.

Coto v. New York City Board of Elections

101 F.3d 803 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 8, 1996

As explained in the companion opinion Gold v. … See Coto v. New York City Bd. of Elections, 97 F.3d 680 (2d Cir.1996).

Gaetano & Associates Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

183 F. App'x 17 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 16, 2006

Accordingly, we defer to the Board’s factual findings. See Holo-Krome Co. v. … First, there is no prohibition on the Board’s consideration of circumstantial evidence. See NLRB v.

Singh v. Board of Immigration Appeals

243 F. App'x 645 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 2, 2007

Twum v. INS, 411 F.3d 54, 58 (2d Cir.2005). … Ke Zhen Zhao v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice, 265 F.3d 83 , 93 (2d Cir. 2001) (internal citations omitted).

Vogel v. New York City Board of Education

67 F. App'x 33 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 29, 2003

Plaintiff David Vogel, a teacher who is partially paralyzed on his right side, brought this action against the New York City Board of Education, claiming that the Board violated his rights under the Americans with Disabilities … In a Memorandum and Order dated August 8, 2002, the District Court for the Eastern District of New York (David Trager, Judge) granted the Board of Education’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

National Labor Relations Board v. United Technologies Corp.

706 F.2d 1254 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 21, 1983

Lawlor v. … But see Eastex, Inc. v.

National Labor Relations Board v. New York Telephone Company

930 F.2d 1009 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 16, 1991

NLRB v. Acme Industrial Co., 385 U.S. 432, 435-36 , 87 S.Ct. 565, 567-68 , 17 L.Ed.2d 495 (1967). … E.g., Olivetti Office U.S.A., Inc. v. NLRB, 926 F.2d 181 , 187 (2d Cir.1991); NLRB v. United Technologies Corp., 884 F.2d 1569 , 1575 (2d Cir.1989); Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. v.

Chawki v. NYC Board of Education

341 F. App'x 660 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 5, 2009

See Raniola v. Bratton, 243 F.3d 610, 625 (2d Cir.2001). … Cioffi v. Averill Park Cent. Sch. Dist. Bd. of Ed., 444 F.3d 158 , 168 (2d Cir.2006).

Colecraft Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

385 F.2d 998 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 22, 1967

B. v. River Togs, Inc., supra. … B. v. Flomatic Corp., supra.

United States Shipping Board Merchant Fleet Corp. v. Dietrich

27 F.2d 681 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 9, 1928

We affirmed the judgment in Dietrich v. U. S. .Shipping Board E. F. Corp., 9 F. (2d) 733. … Concrete Steel Co. v. Hart, 285 F. 322, 325 . Nevertheless, this rule need not tie our hands, where the error is clear, and especially when the court expressly declines to hear argument.

Singh v. Board of Immigration Appeals

220 F. App'x 32 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 21, 2007

See Kaur v. BIA, 413 F.3d 232, 233 (2d Cir.2005) (per curiam); Jin Ming Liu v. Gonzales, 439 F.3d 109, 111 (2d Cir.2006) (per curiam). An asylum applicant may file only one motion to reopen. 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (c)(2).

National Labor Relations Board v. Meenan Oil Co., L.P.

139 F.3d 311 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 4, 1998

Inst., Inc. v. … NLRB v. The Grease Co., 567 F.2d 531, 533 (2d Cir.1977). Ordinarily, the Board’s factual findings stand if they are supported by substantial evidence. 29 U.S.C. § 160 (f); see also Universal Camera Corp. v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Elvine Knitting Mills, Inc.

138 F.2d 633 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 26, 1943

In a supplemental brief respondent asserted that the Board’s petition was barred by reason of a statute passed after the petition was filed in this court. … More broadly still it asserts that such a claim is not within our powers of review, under § 10(e) of the Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 160 (e), or one that respondent may raise, under Alabama Power Co. v.

Choh v. Brown University

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 1, 2026

See Choh v. Brown University, 753 F. Supp. 3d 117, 137 (D. Conn. 2024). … Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 325–26 (1962). Our conclusion is bolstered by the Supreme Court’s reasoning in National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) v. Alston, 594 U.S. 69 (2021).

Youdon v. Board of Immigration Appeals

204 F. App'x 89 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 6, 2006

Cao He Lin v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice, 428 F.3d 391, 406 (2d Cir.2005); Tian-Yong Chen v. INS, 359 F.3d 121, 129 (2d Cir.2004); see also Xiao Ji Chen v. U.S. … Rule Ev. 201(b),(c); Latifi v.

Byrne Dairy, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

431 F.2d 1363 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 9, 1970

A majority of the Board’s three-man panel, affirming the trial examiner, found precisely that. … We must uphold the Board when, as here, there is a fair basis for concluding the employer had crossed the line and seriously impaired the likelihood of a fair election. See Note, NLRB v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Local No. 1261

222 F.2d 542 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 20, 1955

The record as a whole supports the Board’s conclusions that the alleged .agreement existed and was enforced in ■ order to “encourage or discourage membership in a labor organization.” … Universal Camera Corp. v. N. L. R. B., 340 U.S. 474 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 ; National Labor Relations Board v.

Simeonov v. Board of Immigration Appeals

235 F. App'x 760 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 7, 2007

See Islami v. Gonzales, 412 F.3d 391, 397-98 (2d Cir.2005). … See Li Yong Cao v.

Szabo Food Services, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

550 F.2d 705 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 27, 1976

See Wheeler-Van Label Co. v. NLRB, 408 F.2d 613, 616 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 834 (1969); Empire State Sugar Co. v. NLRB, 401 F.2d 559, 562 (2 Cir. 1968). … Continental Insurance Co. v. NLRB, 409 F.2d 727, 729 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 902 (1969); see NLRB v. Solis Theatre Corp., 403 F.2d 381 (2 Cir. 1968).

National Labor Relations Board v. Bridgeport Ambulance Service

966 F.2d 725 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 10, 1992

See NLRB v. A. … An employer’s motivation is a factual question committed in the first instance to the Board. United Aircraft Corp. v. NLRB, 440 F.2d 85, 91-92 (2d Cir.1971).