Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.34s
National Labor Relations Board v. American Laundry MacHinery Co.
152 F.2d 400 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 10, 1945
National Labor Relations Board v. American Laundry Machinery Co., 2 Cir., 138 F.2d 889 . … National Labor Relations Board, 319 U.S. 533, 539 , 63 S.Ct. 1214 , 87 L.Ed. 1568 ; National Labor Relations Board v.
Cited 15 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Yale & Towne Mfg. Co.
114 F.2d 376 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 16, 1940
See Swift & Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 10 Cir., 106 F.2d 87 , 91 ; National Labor Relations Board v. Piqua Munising W. Products Co., 6 Cir., 109 F.2d 552, 557 ; National Labor Relations Board v. … Paragraph 2(b) of the order must be modified to conform to our decisions in National Labor Relations Board v. Leviton Mfg. Co., 2 Cir., 111 F.2d 619 , and Phelps Dodge Corp. v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Karp Metal Products, Co.
134 F.2d 954 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 25, 1943
National Labor Relations Board v. Dahlstrom Metallic Door Co., 2 Cir., 112 F.2d 756, 758 . We reiterate that ruling. … Nothing in National Labor Relations Board v. P. Lorillard Co., 314 U.S. 512 , 62 S.Ct. 397 , 86 L.Ed. 380 , is to the contrary of this position.
Cited 9 timesPublishedBrown-Kerr, Inc. v. Steam Tug P. R. R. No. 32
47 F.2d 1082 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 2, 1931
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion textBryant Chucking Grinder Company v. National Labor Relations Board
389 F.2d 565 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 12, 1967
The Board could properly hold that this promise of benefit was a violation of Section 8(a) (1). NLRB v. Exchange Parts Co., 375 U.S. 405, 409 , 84 S.Ct. 457 , 11 L.Ed.2d 435 (1964); NLRB v. … Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 321 U.S. 702 [ 64 S.Ct. 817 , 88 L.Ed. 1020 ]; National Labor Relations Board v. P. Lorillard Co., 314 U.S. 512 [ 62 S.Ct. 397 , 86 L.Ed. 380 ]; National Labor Relations Board v.
Cited 20 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Roman Catholic Diocese
535 F.2d 1387 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 4, 1976
Nevertheless, the Board asserted jurisdiction on the ground that the Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn, over which the Board admittedly has jurisdiction, is a joint employer of the lay teachers in St. Leo’s School. … Accordingly, we enforce the Board’s order.in its entirety.
Cited 1 timesPublishedDietrich v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.
9 F.2d 733 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 10, 1925
Board, the Emergency Fleet Corporation were also intended to be parties. In Sloan Shipyards Corporation v. United *739 States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corporation, 258 U. S. 549 , 42 S. Ct. 386 , 66 L. … In Leduc v. Ward, 20 Q. B. D. 475, 6 Asp. Mar. L. Cas. 290, Lord Esher said: “If the bill of lading is wrong as to the goods put on board, its effect is "destroyed for any other purpose.
Cited 36 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Gottfried Baking Co., Inc.
210 F.2d 772 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 17, 1954
B. v. Gaynor News Co., supra. The Union, relying upon N. L. R. B. v. Guy F. … B. v. Westex Boot & Shoe Co., 5 Cir., 190 F.2d 12 . See also N. L. R. B. v. Gaynor News Co., supra; N. L. R. B. v. Dinion Coil Co., supra; N. L. R. B. v. Pecheur Lozenge Co., Inc., supra.
Cited 35 timesPublishedGant v. Wallingford Board of Education
69 F.3d 669 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 26, 1995
Law Rep. 584 Ray GANT, Jr., Ray Gant, Sr. and Elisa Gant, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. WALLINGFORD BOARD OF EDUCATION, Barbara Beecher, Richard Centner, Phyllis Dechello, Mark Moynihan, T. … Id. at 431 (quoting Brown v. Board of Education 347 U.S. 483, 493 , 74 S.Ct. 686, 691 , 98 L.Ed. 873 (1953)).
Cited 0 timesPublishedGreystone Knitwear Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board
311 F.2d 794 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 8, 1963
The Board’s order is based upon its findings that the Company instigated and assisted the formation of a labor organization of its warehouse employees and refused to recognize District 65, Retail, Wholesale and Department … The Board’s findings are amply supported by the evidence. They are affirmed in open court. An enforcement order will issue.
Cited 1 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Roure-Dupont Mfg., Inc.
199 F.2d 631 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 7, 1952
B. v. Bell Oil & Gas Co., 5 Cir, 98 F.2d 406 , rehearing denied 98 F.2d 870 ; N. L. R. B. v. American Creosoting Co., 6 Cir., 139 F.2d 193 , certiorari denied American Creosoting Co. v. N. L. R. … B. v. Bird Mach. Co., 1 Cir., 161 F.2d 589, 591 ; R. R. Donnelley & Sons, Co. v. N. L. R. B, 7 Cir, 156 F.2d 416, 418 , certiorari denied 329 U.S. 810 , 67 S.Ct. 624 , 91 L.Ed. 692 ; N. L. R. B. v.
Cited 11 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Timken Silent Automatic Co.
114 F.2d 449 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 20, 1940
Finley v. Union Joint Stock Land Bank, 281 Mich. 214 , 274 N.W. 768 ; Gledhill v. Fisher & Co., 272 Mich. 353 , 262 N.W. 371 , 102 A.L.R. 1042 ; Kingston *451 Dry Dock Co. v. … National Labor Relations Board v. National Casket Co., 2 Cir., 107 F.2d 992 ; Phelps-Dodge Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board, 113 F.2d 202 , 2 Cir., decided July 11, 1940.
Cited 7 timesPublishedUnited States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp. v. Greenwald
16 F.2d 948 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 10, 1927
Co. v. Campbell (9th Circuit) 8 F.(2d) 223 , the injury occurred on board ship and the death as a result of the injury occurred on shore. The suit was under section 33 of the Jones Act (Comp. … Sloan Shipyards v. U. S. Shipping Board, etc., 258 U. S. 549 , 42 S. Ct. 386 , 66 L. Ed. 762 ; Everett v. United States (D. C.) 277 F. 256 ; Stewart v. U. S. Shipping Board, etc. (D. C.) 7 F.(2d) 676 .
Cited 10 timesPublishedKfc National Management Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board
497 F.2d 298 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 8, 1974
Given these admissions, we believe the Board’s reliance on our decision in Eastern Air Lines, Inc. v. … Morgan v. United States, 298 U.S. 468, 481 , 56 S.Ct. 906 , 80 L.Ed. 1288 (1936); Labor Board v. Mackay Radio & Telegraph Co., 304 U.S. 333, 350-51 , 58 S.Ct. 904 , 82 L.Ed. 1381 (1938); Edison Co. v.
Cited 49 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. United Mineral & Chemical Corporation
391 F.2d 829 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 16, 1968
Co. v. NLRB, 331 F.2d 737 (6 Cir. 1964) and NLRB v. Superflex Drugs, Inc., 341 F.2d 747 (6 Cir. 1965), on which the Board mistakenly relied. … The Board threw out five cards solicited by supervisor Thomas, see NLRB v. Hamilton Plastic Molding Co., 312 F.2d 723 (6 Cir. 1963), leaving 35.
Cited 15 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Ford Radio & Mica Corporation
258 F.2d 457 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 12, 1958
B. v. … B. v. West Coast Casket Co., 9 Cir., 1953, 205 F.2d 902 , both of which are also relied upon by the Board.
Cited 19 timesPublished486 F. App'x 959 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 22, 2012
11-1461 Brown v. … In light of these circumstances, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Brown’s request for leave to amend. See McCarthy v.
Cited 3 timesUnpublishedScobell Chemical Company, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
267 F.2d 922 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 18, 1959
B. v. Consolidated Machine Tool Corp., 2 Cir., 163 F.2d 376 , certiorari denied 332 U.S. 824 , 68 S.Ct. 164 , 92 L.Ed. 399 ; N. L. R. B. v. Stow Mfg. … B. v. Pyne Molding Corp., 2 Cir., 226 F.2d 818 .
Cited 10 timesPublishedNazareth Regional High School v. National Labor Relations Board
549 F.2d 873 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 28, 1977
The NLRB further found that under NLRB v. … See, Howard Johnson Co. v. Detroit Local Joint Executive Board, Hotel & Restaurant Employees, 417 U.S. 249, 262-65 , 94 S.Ct. 2236 , 41 L.Ed.2d 46 (1974); NLRB v.
Cited 48 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. M & M Oldsmobile, Inc.
377 F.2d 712 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 3, 1967
In NLRB v. … The short answer is that the Board had jurisdiction to find an unfair labor practice and to remedy it. Cf. NLRB v.
Cited 21 timesPublished
Ask Donna