Case law

Anna Lange v. Houston County, Georgia

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Sep 9, 2025

Ct. at 1834 (reasoning that the comparator “would lack a qualifying diagnosis”). That misapplies step three. … Similarly, we should not extend Skrmetti’s Equal Protection Clause analysis to this Title VII context and stray from established Title VII jurisprudence.

United States v. Fitzgerald Lamar Wright

154 F. App'x 790 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Nov 15, 2005

. § 841(a)(1)(B), clearly indicated that the minimum supervised release term was eight years. See Fed.R.Crim.P. 11(b)(1)(H); 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1)(B). … Pursuant to § 3E1.1(b), a defendant may qualify for an additional one-level reduction if, inter alia, he timely notifies authorities of his intention to enter a guilty plea, thus permitting the government and the court

United States v. Damon Depreece Garrett

172 F. App'x 295 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Mar 27, 2006

Because the issue whether Agent Grant qualified as a “federal officer” under § 1114 was a legal issue for the court to decide, the court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to give a jury question on it. … In applying Booker, we have determined that a district court’s interpretation of the federal guidelines still is subject to de novo review, while its factual findings must be accepted unless clearly erroneous.

Viridis Corporation v. TCA Global Credit Master Fund, LP

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Jan 3, 2018

While the allegations of such threats contained in paragraphs 84, 93-99 and 111 of the TAC refer to defaults of the FCA and Second Amendment to the FCA, the allegations contained in paragraphs 136- 47 clearly relate to … To establish a claim under the analogous Nevada unfair trade practices statute, Nev. Rev.

Silver Comet Terminal Partners, LLC v. Paulding County Airport Authority

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Apr 18, 2023

As a result, Silver Comet has failed to establish that the exception applies. … So expenses charged eventually to Silver Comet qualify as a kind of “any and all . . . expense[s].”

United States v. Romie Roland

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Jun 14, 2018

Ashburn did not clearly indicate whether the patients received treatment from Dr. … “If admissibility could be established merely by the ipse dixit of an admittedly qualified expert, the reliability prong would be, for all practical purposes, subsumed by the qualification prong.”

Tallahassee Bail Fund v. Clerk of the Circuit Court and Comptroller for Leon County

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Jun 1, 2026

This fact is established by [the Fund’s founder] credible tes- timony on this point. . . . … These findings were not clearly erroneous.

Veronza L. Bowers, Jr. v. United States Parole Commission

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · May 22, 2019

It further found that the escape attempt still qualified as a serious offense many years later, given the gravity of the violation. We find no abuse of discretion in these findings. … DOJ may not submit its opinions to the Commission as the latter considers pending cases. 39  Case: 16-15737 Date Filed: 05/22/2019 Page: 40 of 42 clearly