Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersbta

10,000+ results

1.60s

  • Harris-Emery Co. v. Commissioner

    37 B.T.A. 958 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jun 1, 1938

    Blair v. Chicago, 201 U. S. 400 .) In *965 so far as the grantee is concerned, it has a right not unlike that which a lessee under a lease contract acquires. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will l>e entered v/nder Rule 50.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Gessner v. Commissioner

    32 B.T.A. 1258 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Aug 23, 1935

    It having been apparently conceded both before the Board and here that if the Board’s interpretation of Act 212 was erroneous, and if the income liere involved was derived from an estate by the entirety, it was all taxable … Battjes Fuel & Buildmig Material Co. v. Milanowski, 236 Mich. 622 ; Peoples State Bank of Pontiac v. Reckling, 252 Mich. 833 ; American State Trust Co. v. Rosenthal, 255 Mich. 157 ; Bankers Trust Co. v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Kahn v. Commissioner

    38 B.T.A. 1417 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Dec 16, 1938

    When the question arises before the Board the taxpayer must prove the fact of worthlessness. The evidence must be such as reasonably to convince the Board that the accounts were in fact worthless. … Both petitioners and respondent rely on Cohan v. Commissioner, 39 Fed. (2d) 540 (C. C. A., 2d Cir.).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Commissioner

    35 B.T.A. 949 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 27, 1937

    It is not supported by any decision which has come to our attention except those of the Board. In Knickerbocker Imp. Co. v. Board of Assessors, 74 N. J. Law 583, 585, 65 A. 913, 915 , 7 L. R. A. (N. … A. 941; reversed, Commissioner v. Boca Ceiga Development Co., 66 Fed. (2d) 1004; and despite the decisions of the Board in Houghton & Dutton Co., 26 B. T. A. 52; James D. Robinson, 21 B. T. A. 1018; affd., Robinson v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Alabama Hardware Co. v. Commissioner

    7 B.T.A. 1178 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Aug 29, 1927

    A proceeding in court may be begun for any part of the amount, claim for which is allowed by the Board. … Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Neuberger v. Commissioner

    37 B.T.A. 223 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 28, 1938

    S. 683 , and Winmill v. Commissioner, 93 Fed. (2d) 494, affirming the Board at 35 B. T. A. 804, on this point. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered mder Rule 50.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Surety Finance Co. of Tacoma v. Commissioner

    27 B.T.A. 616 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 31, 1933

    Co. v. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered for the respondent.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Watson v. Commissioner

    35 B.T.A. 706 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Mar 23, 1937

    Then March 30, 1928, the Board promulgated its decision in Victor G. Marquissee, 11 B. T. A. 334; affd., sub nom Lewis v. Commissioner, 47 Fed. (2d) 32. … Missouri Insurance Co. v. Gehner, supra. There may be expressions in the opinion of the court and Board in the Marquissee case, supra, which are inconsistent with statements of the Board in the Knox case, supra.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Conley v. Commissioner

    18 B.T.A. 736 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 10, 1930

    Docker was retained at the same monthly compensation at the will of the Board. … See Blair v. Howard,-U. S.-, decided December 9, 1929, and, we, accordingly, hold that the compensation paid by the irrigation districts to these petitioners is not exempt from Federal taxation.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Growers Cold Storage Co. v. Commissioner

    17 B.T.A. 1279 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 7, 1929

    The Board held that it was not a business league, and that it was not required to operate at cost. … In Kansas City Hay Dealers’ Assn. v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Bullington v. Commissioner

    38 B.T.A. 754 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 7, 1938

    It occupied a substantial part of the time of the board members. … Metcalf & Eddy v. Mitchell, 269 U. S. 514 ; Board of Trustees v. United States, 289 U. S. 48 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Gibson Amusement Co. v. Commissioner

    22 B.T.A. 1212 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 16, 1931

    the authority of Com’r. of Internal Revenue v. … Avery v. Commissioner, 22 Fed. (2d) 6. This burden of proof petitioner has not sustained. Reviewed by the Board. Decision will be entered, for the respondent.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Craig v. Commissioner

    18 B.T.A. 86 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 9, 1929

    The Board is not a court, Old Colony Trust Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 279 U. … A. 1119, and Peerless Woolen Mills v. Rose, 24 Fed. (2d) 576. We find no conflict between the decision in the Kelley case and the decisions of the Board.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Simms v. Commissioner

    28 B.T.A. 988 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Aug 11, 1933

    SIMMS, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Simms v. Commissioner Docket Nos. 19175, 19791. … United States v. Phellis, 257 U.S. 156 ; Weiss v. Stearn, 265 U.S. 242 . The foregoing principles have been consistently followed by the Board. Anna M. Harkness, 1 B.T.A. 127 ; B. F. Saul, 4 B.T.A. 639 ; William H.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • John A. Gebelein, Inc. v. Commissioner

    37 B.T.A. 605 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Mar 31, 1938

    The notice need not be in any special form or advise the taxpayer of his right to file a petition with the Board, Ventura Consolidated Oil Fields v. Bogan, supra; Commissioner v. … Reviewed by the Board. Hill concurs only in the result.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Oesterlein Machine Co. v. Commissioner

    1 B.T.A. 159 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Dec 11, 1924

    the Board and its divisions and all evidence received by the Board and its divisions * * * shall be public records open to the inspection of the public * * *. … The United States Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit, in the case of United States v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Morriss Realty Co. v. Commissioner

    23 B.T.A. 1076 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jul 10, 1931

    And it was said in White v. … Where the ancestral element has been present and the evident object of a trust has been liquidation of property, the Board has followed the principle of Blair v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Bioff v. Commissioner

    47 B.T.A. 942 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 27, 1942

    Board of Tax Appeals v. United States ex rel. … Erving v. Dwyer, 18 B. T. A. 319; Reliance Manufacturing Co. v. Blair, 19 Fed. (2d) 798; Weaver v. Blair, 19 Fed. (2d) 16.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Newhall v. Commissioner

    10 B.T.A. 656 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Feb 10, 1928

    Cls. 126, and Ward v. Hopkins, U. S. District Court, Texas. The latter case, for some reason went no higher than the district court, and the Board has already said in the Appeal of Even Realty Co., 1 B. T. … In United States v. Ludey, 274 U. S. 295 , 47 S.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Falk v. Commissioner

    24 B.T.A. 299 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 7, 1931

    A. 391; Baltzell v. Mitchell, 3 Fed. (2d) 428; certiorari denied, 268 U. S. 690 ; Whitcomb v. Blair, 25 Fed. (2d) 528; affirming Louis P. V. Whitcomb et al., 4 B. T. A. 80; Abell v. Tail, 30 Fed. (2d) 54; Hubbell v. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered for the respondent.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.