Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.28s
Shamrock Oil Co. v. Commissioner
29 B.T.A. 910 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 24, 1934
San Joaquin Fruit & Investment Co., 52 Fed. (2d) 123; Commissioner v. New York Trust Co., 54 Fed. (2d) 463; Jere R. Downing, supra; Commissioner v. … Nichols & Cox Lumber Co., 65 Fed. (2d) 1009; Pittsburgh Terminal Coal Corp. v. Heiner, 56 Fed. (2d) 1072.
Cited 4 timesPublishedWorkingmen's Overall Supply Co. v. Glander
58 Ohio Law. Abs. 385 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 4, 1950
The Board feels that it is supported in its view by what is found in Schumacher Stone Co. v. Tax Commission, 134 Oh St 529, 13 O. O. 161, and Cleveland-Cliffs Iron Company v. Glander, 145 Oh St 423, 31 O. O. 39. … The Tax Commissioner, therefore, did -not arbitrarily disregard the statutes enumerated, ,v ¡ *391 Regarding the claim that its used garments and towels have no inventory value, the Board of Tax Appeals is emphatically of
Cited 1 timesPublished21 B.T.A. 515 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Dec 2, 1930
Co. v. Rahn, 132 U. … In Railroad Co. v. Hanning, 82 U.
Cited 8 timesPublishedNorthwestern Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Commissioner
1 B.T.A. 767 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Mar 16, 1925
The relief which he was denied in court he in effect was given through an appeal to the Board. … San Mateo County v. Southern Pacific R. R. Co., 116 U. S. 138 ; Little v. Bowers 134 U. S. 547 ; Mills v. Green, 159 U. S. 651 .
Cited 1 timesPublished4 B.T.A. 1257 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 30, 1926
In support of this contention, he cites the case of Edwards v. Douglas, 269 U. S. 204 . … We have carefully considered the case of Edwards v.
Cited 0 timesPublished41 B.T.A. 186 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 25, 1940
Within ninety days after the notice was mailed the transferee petitioned the Board for a redetermination. … These statements, the Commissioner says, bring this proceeding within the decision in Tyson v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedOlympia Veneer Co. v. Commissioner
22 B.T.A. 892 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Mar 25, 1931
Dry Goods Co. v. United States, and White v. Hood Rubber Co., 280 U. S. 453 . … The case of White v.
Cited 0 timesPublished26 B.T.A. 682 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jul 20, 1932
That case was based on established rulings of the Federal courts and has been approvingly cited by the Board in subsequent cases. It stands as the considered judgment of the Board. See Marry M. Lee, Executor, 18 B. T. … Hancy, supra; Chase National Bank v. United States, 278 U. S. 327 . Pennsylvania Co., etc. v. Lederer, supra; Fidelity Philadelphia Trust Co. v. McCaughn, 34 Fed. (2d) 600. Decision will he entered for the respondent.
Cited 5 timesPublishedCloquet Coop. Society v. Commissioner
21 B.T.A. 744 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Dec 17, 1930
Board of Directors. Sec. 1. … Also see State v. Northwestern Telephone Exchange Co., 80 Minn. 17 ; 82 N. W. 1090 ; National Bond & Security Co. v. Hopkins, 96 Minn. 119 ; 104 N. W. 678 ; Thompson v. United States, 8 Fed. (2d) 175.
Cited 7 timesPublishedTel-Electric Co. v. Commissioner
1 B.T.A. 434 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 29, 1925
In this case the Board clearly has jurisdiction to consider the deficiency in tax found by the Commissioner for the years 1918 and 1919. … Taxpayer relies upon the decision of the Court of Claims in the case of the Brilliant Coal Company v. United States, 59 Ct.
Cited 2 timesPublishedNibley-Mimnaugh Lumber Co. v. Commissioner
32 B.T.A. 791 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jun 14, 1935
That court remanded the proceeding on May 7, 1934, Commissioner v. … In accordance with the court’s mandate directing that the decision of the Board be reinstated, if the Board finds that petitioner was on an' accrual basis, Judgment will be entered of “Deficiency or overpayment, none; and
Cited 2 timesPublished78 Ohio Law. Abs. 581 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Aug 26, 1957
issue before the Board of Tax Appeals. … See Higbee Co. v. Evatt, 140 Oh St 325, 23 O. O. 543. The only witness to appear in this case for appellant was its attorney, Peter S.
Cited 1 timesPublishedLouis S. Cohn Co. v. Commissioner
12 B.T.A. 1281 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jul 11, 1928
COHN CO., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Louis S. Cohn Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 13501. … United States Board of Tax Appeals 12 B.T.A. 1281 ; 1928 BTA LEXIS 3372 ; July 11, 1928 , Promulgated *3372 1.
Cited 0 timesPublished28 B.T.A. 18 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · May 4, 1933
In Robinson v. … In rebuttal the respondent introduced one witness who is also a member of the Dallas Real Estate Board.
Cited 5 timesPublishedPeoples Life Ins. Co. v. Commissioner
31 B.T.A. 706 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 23, 1934
Murdoch : The Board, on August 31, 1934, promulgated a memorandum opinion in these proceedings in which, inter alia, it cited the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in Commissioner v. … Eeviewed by the Board.
Cited 0 timesPublished7 B.T.A. 820 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jul 29, 1927
In Brookman v. … In De Bary v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedPolicyholder's Nat'l Life Ins. Co. v. Commissioner
37 B.T.A. 60 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 14, 1938
Howland Realty Co. v. Commissioner, 47 Fed. (2d) 1018; affirming 18 B. T. A. 405; Arthur R. Jones Syndicate, supra; Carden Homes Co. v. Commissioner, 64 Fed. (2d) 593, 598. … Wiggin Terminals, Inc. v. United States, supra.
Cited 3 timesPublished39 Ohio Law. Abs. 243 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Mar 19, 1943
See American Steel & Wire Company v. Speed, 192 U. S. 500 , 48 L. Ed. 538 . Brown v. Houston, 114 U S. 622, 29 L. Ed. 257 . In the latter case the first syllabus is as follows: “1. … BOARD OF TAX APPEALS.
Cited 0 timesPublished34 B.T.A. 1158 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 20, 1936
Collin v. Commissioner, 32 Fed. (2d) 753; Newman v. Commissioner, 40 Fed. (2d) 225, 227; certiorari denied, 282 U. S. 858 ; Tex-Penn Oil Co. v. … In Salvage v.
Cited 7 timesPublished20 B.T.A. 647 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 3, 1930
A. 1405; McCahan v. McCaughn, 39 Fed. (2d) 3; and compare Hellmich v. Hellman, 276 U. S. 233 . … Costello v. McConnico, 168 U. S. 674 ; Aikens v. Kinsbury, 247 U. S. 484 ; Dahnke Walker Co. v. Bondurant, 257 U. S. 282 ; Rindge Co. v. Los Angeles, 262 U. S. 700 .
Cited 8 timesPublished
Ask Donna