Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.65s
14 B.T.A. 605 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Dec 6, 1928
In Mesce v. United States, 64 Ct. Cls. 481, the ordinance passed by the city council, of the City of Chicago authorized the board of local improvements “to employ” real estate experts. … Metcalf & Eddy v. Mitchell, 269 U. S. 514 ; Lyons v. Reinecke, 10 Fed. (2d) 3; Mesce v. United States, supra; R. Clipston Sturgis, 10 B. T. A. 1394; George W. Fuller, 9 B. T. A. 108; Fred H. Tibbetts, supra; Emma B.
Cited 3 timesPublished36 B.T.A. 109 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jun 15, 1937
A. 1381; affd., 79 Fed. (2d) 561; Helvering v. Stifel, 75 Fed. (2d) 583, affirming an unpublished decision of the Board. … A. 1088; affd., 88 Fed. (2d) 616; Keeler v. Commissioner, 86 Fed. (2d) 265, affirming an unpublished decision of the Board; Skinner v. Eaton, 45 Fed. (2d) 568; certiorari denied, 283 U. S. 837 .
Cited 2 timesPublished43 Ohio Law. Abs. 485 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Aug 8, 1945
See also Hayes v Yost, Treasurer, 4 C. C. (ns) 455; Moore v Given, 39 Oh St 661; Davies, Jr., Auditor v Investment Company, 76 Oh St 407; O'Connor v Austin, 140 Oh St 7. … In the cases of Cleveland Theatres, Inc., v Evatt, 24 O O 148 and Tyroler Realty Company v Board of Revision, 26 O O 304, this Board held that the provisions of §5624-10 GC, do not authorize the remission of taxes and penalties
Cited 0 timesPublished15 B.T.A. 806 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Mar 12, 1929
In the recent case of Blair v. … McCulloch v. Maryland, 4 Wheat. 316 ; Gillespie v. Oklahoma, 257 U. S. 501 ; Metcalf & Eddy v. Mitchell, 269 U. S. 514 ; Panhandle Oil Co. v. State, 297 U. S. 218 .
Cited 5 timesPublished41 B.T.A. 220 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 30, 1940
He was justified in so holding; for this Board had held in Seymour H. … Under date of December 19, 1939, the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit reversed an unreported memorandum decision of this Board (Docket No. 92719) in McBrier v.
Cited 6 timesPublished33 B.T.A. 761 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Dec 20, 1935
The respondent in his behalf presented as witnesses, John V. Carey, customers’ man for West & Co., brokers, from 1926 to 1930, inclusive, and Frederick D. Bendler, a revenue agent. … . *763 The Supreme Court, in Helvering v. Rankin, 295 U. S. 123 , reversing the decision of the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in Rankin v.
Cited 0 timesPublished16 B.T.A. 419 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · May 9, 1929
Hall v. Wisconsin, supra; Auffmordt v. Hedden, 137 U. S. 310 . … See United States v. Maurice, 2 Brock. 96, 102, 103 ; Untied States v. Germaine, 99 U. S. 508, 511, 512 ; Adams v.
Cited 3 timesPublished39 B.T.A. 1075 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · May 25, 1939
Brown 490 3,675 1,225 Weston M. … Brown, who owned 490 shares of stock, and Brown Prosser, who owned 70 shares of stock, disposed of their stock at $1,000 per share.
Cited 4 timesPublishedAlmours Secur., Inc. v. Commissioner
35 B.T.A. 61 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 13, 1936
United Business Corporation of America v. Commissioner, supra; United States v. Tway Coal Sales Co. (C. C. A., 6th Cir.), 15 Fed. (2d) 336; Irvington Investments Co., 32 B. T. A. 1165. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered for the respondent.
Cited 10 timesPublished8 Ohio Misc. 100 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Mar 1, 1966
The appellant relies primarily on the case of Kirtland Country Club Co. v. Bowers, Tax Commr., 174 Ohio St. 116 , and appellee bases his argument on the American Jersey Cattle Club v. … The syllabus of Kirtland Country Club Co. v.
Cited 1 timesPublished30 B.T.A. 837 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · May 31, 1934
This proceeding does not differ in principle from that of Browne v. Commissioner, 22 B.T.A. 678 ; aff'd., 63 Fed. (2d) 66; 291 U.S. 193 . … Compare North American Oil Consolidated v. Burnet, 286 U.S. 417, 424 .
Cited 3 timesPublished3 B.T.A. 79 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 20, 1925
Baltzell v. Mitchell, 3 Fed. (2d) 428; Appeal of Brown & Ives, Trustees, 2 B. T. A. 936.
Cited 3 timesPublishedC. D. Johnson Lumber Corp. v. Commissioner
47 B.T.A. 873 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 13, 1942
S. 185 ; Marlborough House, Inc. v. Commissioner, 315 U. S. 189 ; and Helvering v. Southwest Consolidated Corporation, 315 U. … Rogers, Brown & Crocker Bros., Inc., 32 B. T. A. 307. Market value, even if it had been satisfactorily proven, is irrelevant.
Cited 0 timesPublished28 B.T.A. 472 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jun 20, 1933
Brinton v. Commissioner Docket Nos. 53715, 55341, 55342. United States Board of Tax Appeals 28 B.T.A. 472 ; 1933 BTA LEXIS 1127 ; June 20, 1933 , Promulgated *1127 1. … Farmer v. Zinn, 261 S.W. 1073 ; Heller v. Heller, 233 S.W. 870 ; Scaggs v. Deskin, 66 S.W. 793 ; Smith v. Butler, supra.
Cited 0 timesPublishedWholesale Coal Co. v. Commissioner
16 B.T.A. 550 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · May 14, 1929
Gamble, Cleric, United, States Board of Taw Appeals, Washington, D. C. Re: Wholesale Coal Company, Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent. Docket No. 24532. … Coal Company, Docket No. 4515, decided by the Board on January 26, 1926.
Cited 0 timesPublished10 B.T.A. 553 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Feb 7, 1928
In Joy Floral Co., v. Commissioner, 7 B. T. … See North Texas Lumber Co. v. Commissioner, 7 B. T. A. 1193. Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered for the respondent.
Cited 3 timesPublished39 B.T.A. 56 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 10, 1939
On June 22, 1938, respondent filed with the Board a computation for entry of decision in accordance with the opinion of the Board. … United States v. Andrews, 302 U. S. 517 ; United States v. Garbutt Oil Co., 302 U. S. 528 .
Cited 2 timesPublishedCentral Iron & Metal Co. v. Evatt
39 Ohio Law. Abs. 69 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jul 19, 1943
See Board of Education v. Budget Commission, 139 Oh. St., 313, 313; Miner v. Witt, 82 Oh. St., 237; Travis v. Public Utilities Commission, 123 Oh. St., 355. … Jur., §410, p. 1324; State ex Pulskamp v. Board of County Commissioners, 119 Oh. St., 504.
Cited 0 timesPublishedStanley Co. of Am. v. Commissioner
26 B.T.A. 705 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jul 26, 1932
If the aforesaid order of the Board (attached as Exhibit A) is a bar to the right of this petitioner in this proceeding of seeking a redetermination of the tax liability of said Stanley Realty Company on the merits, the Board … Company o’f America as ’transferee, the petitioner herein, is ’foreclosed by the aforesaid order ’of the Board in the case of Stanley Realty Company v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedCity Nat'l Bank Bldg. Co. v. Commissioner
34 B.T.A. 93 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Mar 10, 1936
The decision of the Board in F. and R. Lazarus & Co., 32 B. T. A. 633, now on appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, and the decision of the Sixth Circuit in Commissioner v. … The opinions of the Board in the above mentioned cases were promulgated prior to the decision of the Supreme Court in Senior v. Braden, supra. The appellate court in the Neighbors case considered Senior v.
Cited 3 timesPublished
Ask Donna