Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersbta

10,000+ results

4.14s

  • Shoenberg v. Commisioner

    19 B.T.A. 399 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Mar 25, 1930

    Lora: In light of Taft v. Bowers, 278 U. S. 470 , the petitioners have abandoned their contention relative to the constitutionality of section 202 (a) (2) of the Revenue Act of 1921. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will he entered for the respondent. TRussell and Seawell dissent.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ulferts v. Commissioner

    11 B.T.A. 408 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 3, 1928

    ULFERTS, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Ulferts v. Commissioner Docket No. 14034. … United States Board of Tax Appeals 11 B.T.A. 408 ; 1928 BTA LEXIS 3817 ; April 3, 1928 , Promulgated *3817 J. J. Ulferts pro se. Paul L. Peyton, Esq., for the respondent.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Burnham v. Commissioner

    33 B.T.A. 147 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 3, 1935

    They cite Pinellas Ice & Cold Storage Co. v. Commissioner, 287 U. S. 462 , and Cortland Specialty Co. v. … Reviewed by the Board. Decision will he entered under Rule 60. VAN FossaN dissents.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Keen v. Commissioner

    6 B.T.A. 275 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Feb 19, 1927

    HERBERT IDE KEEN, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Keen v. Commissioner Docket No. 8423. … United States Board of Tax Appeals 6 B.T.A. 275 ; 1927 BTA LEXIS 3570 ; February 19, 1927 , Promulgated *3570 John Wattawa, Esq., for the petitioner. C. H. Curl, Esq., for the respondent.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Old Mission Portland Cement Co. v. Commissioner

    25 B.T.A. 305 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 21, 1932

    Anchor Co. v. Commissioner, 42 F. (2d) 99 (C. C. A. 4); Am-Plus Storage Battery Co. v. Commissioner, 35 F. (2d) 167 (C. C. A. 7). * * * In Anchor Co. v. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered under Rule 50. Goodkich dissents.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Champlin v. Commissioner

    1 B.T.A. 1255 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · May 26, 1925

    Champlin v. Commissioner Docket No. 2419. United States Board of Tax Appeals 1 B.T.A. 1255 ; 1925 BTA LEXIS 2605 ; May 26, 1925 , decided Submitted April 27, 1925 . *2605 Harry O. Glasser, Esq., for the taxpayer.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lambert's Point Tow Boat Co. v. Commissioner

    16 B.T.A. 1360 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jul 17, 1929

    Hirschberg v. Bacher, 159 Wis. 207 ; 149 N. W. 383 ; McCall v. Moschowitz, 1 N. Y. St. 99; Ryman v. Kennedy, 141 Ga. 75; 80 S. E. 551 . … Wilcox v. Consolidated Gas Co., 212 U. S. 19 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Kent Oil Co. v. Commissioner

    38 B.T.A. 528 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 13, 1938

    In Helvering v. General Utilities & Operating Co. (C. C. … See United States v. Phellis, 257 U. S. 156 ; Phelps v. Commissioner (C. C. A., 7th Cir.), 54 Fed. (2d) 289; certiorari denied, 285 U. S. 558 ; Labrot v. Burnet, 57 Fed. (2d) 413; Reed v. United States (C. C.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Polichroniades v. Commissioner

    2 B.T.A. 1263 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 9, 1925

    Polichroniades v. Commissioner Docket No. 1265. … United States Board of Tax Appeals 2 B.T.A. 1263 ; 1925 BTA LEXIS 2102 ; November 9, 1925 , Decided Submitted August 24, 1925 . *2102 Martin Bourke, Esq., for the taxpayer.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Adams v. Commissioner

    20 B.T.A. 243 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jul 15, 1930

    ADAMS, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Adams v. Commissioner Docket No. 41167. … He was present at a special meeting of the board of directors of that company held at the office of the company in Philadelphia on December 26, 1924.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Texas Chem. Co. v. Commissioner

    11 B.T.A. 390 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 3, 1928

    TEXAS CHEMICAL CO., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Texas Chem. Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 6360. … United States Board of Tax Appeals 11 B.T.A. 390 ; 1928 BTA LEXIS 3813 ; April 3, 1928 , Promulgated *3813 1.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Kountze v. Commissioner

    24 B.T.A. 405 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 22, 1931

    See Marr v. United States, supra; United States v. Phellis, 257 U. S. 156 ; Rockefeller v. United States, 257 U. S. 176 ; *412 Cullinan v. Walker, 262 U. S. 906 ; United States v. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will he entered under Bule 50.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Chamansky v. Commissioner

    8 B.T.A. 1276 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 7, 1927

    LOUIS CHAMANSKY, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Chamansky v. Commissioner Docket No. 11646. … United States Board of Tax Appeals 8 B.T.A. 1276 ; 1927 BTA LEXIS 2693 ; November 7, 1927 , Promulgated *2693 Louis Chamansky pro se. James A. O'Callahan, Esq., for the respondent.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cereal Products Refining Corp. v. Commissioner

    39 B.T.A. 92 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 17, 1939

    Lynch v. Tilden Produce Co., 265 U. S. 315, 320-322 , 44 S. Ct. 488 , 68 L. Ed. 1034 ; Miller v. United States, 294 U. S. 435, 439, 440 , 55 S. Ct. 440 , 79 L. Ed. 977 , and cases cited. … Co. v. Davidson, 257 U. S. 506, 514 , 42 S. Ct. 179 , 66 L. Ed. 341 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • W. F. Shawver Co. v. Commissioner

    20 B.T.A. 723 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 10, 1930

    SHAWVER CO., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. W. F. Shawver Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 34252. … United States Board of Tax Appeals 20 B.T.A. 723 ; 1930 BTA LEXIS 2042 ; September 10, 1930 , Promulgated *2042 Arthur S. Dayton, Esq., for the petitioner. C. H. Curl, Esq., for the respondent.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hoke v. Commissioner

    5 B.T.A. 1247 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 27, 1927

    GEORGE HOKE, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Hoke v. Commissioner Docket No. 7999. … United States Board of Tax Appeals 5 B.T.A. 1247 ; 1927 BTA LEXIS 3648 ; January 27, 1927 , Promulgated *3648 An individual who kept his books and filed his returns on the calendar-year basis was a member of a partnership

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Parkersburg Chair Co. v. Commissioner

    13 B.T.A. 1251 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 1, 1928

    PARKERSBURG CHAIR CO., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Parkersburg Chair Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 19237. … United States Board of Tax Appeals 13 B.T.A. 1251 ; 1928 BTA LEXIS 3081 ; October, 26, 1928 , Promulgated *3081 Special assessment disallowed for lack of evidence showing inability of the Commissioner to determine invested

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hummel-Ross Fibre Corp. v. Commissioner

    40 B.T.A. 821 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 25, 1939

    HUMMEL-ROSS FIBRE CORPORATION, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Hummel-Ross Fibre Corp. v. Commissioner Docket No. 93077. … United States Board of Tax Appeals 40 B.T.A. 821 ; 1939 BTA LEXIS 798 ; October 25, 1939 , Promulgated *798 Pursuant to a plan of statutory reorganization, and essential thereto, petitioner, on May 31, 1934, exchanged its

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Federal Advertising Agency, Inc. v. Commissioner

    19 B.T.A. 1126 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · May 26, 1930

    FEDERAL ADVERTISING AGENCY, INC., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Federal Advertising Agency, Inc. v. Commissioner Docket Nos. 9835, 11512, 12957, 19391, 21196. … All advertising plans were passed upon by a so-called executive board consisting of Tinsman, Nixon, and the two Kaufmans, with the substitution of Geisinger for Joseph Kaufman in 1920, and this board also passed upon every

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Illinois Merchants Trust Co. v. Commissioner

    14 B.T.A. 890 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Dec 21, 1928

    It appears to be the conclusion of the Board that, because a life interest in the income was reserved, that which was given was a remainder interest which must be measured by its present value. *902 This is a concept which … Irwin v. Gavit, 268 U. S. 161 ; Codman v. Miles, 28 Fed. (2d) 823.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.