Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersbta

10,000+ results

3.35s

  • Reliant Leasing Co. v. Commissioner

    1 B.T.A. 728 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Mar 9, 1925

    Reliant Leasing Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 256. … Hearing was had on the merits and from the evidence submitted the board makes the following FINDINGS OF FACT. 1. The taxpayer was a New York corporation with its principal place of business in New York City.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brinton v. Commissioner

    28 B.T.A. 472 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jun 20, 1933

    Farmer v. Zinn, 261 S.W. 1073 ; Heller v. Heller, 233 S.W. 870 ; Scaggs v. Deskin, 66 SW. 793; Smith v. Butler, supra. … Harbison, 26 B.T.A. 896 , the Board considered a question substantially the same as that here raised by respondent— whether distribution to the trustee (when there is a substantial equitable interest in the beneficiary) is

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Vansant v. Commissioner

    4 B.T.A. 58 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 22, 1926

    Vansant v. Commissioner Docket No. 4274. … United States Board of Tax Appeals 4 B.T.A. 58 ; 1926 BTA LEXIS 2391 ; April 22, 1926 , Decided Submitted November 10, 1925 . *2391 The evidence is insufficient to support a redetermination of deficiency. E. H.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Penn v. Commissioner

    39 B.T.A. 787 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 19, 1939

    PENN, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Penn v. Commissioner Docket No. 90760. … Clifford, Docket No. 89054, an unreported memorandum opinion of this Board entered September 26, 1938.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Marsh v. Commissioner

    12 B.T.A. 1376 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jul 17, 1928

    MARSH, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Marsh v. Commissioner Docket No. 8419. … United States Board of Tax Appeals 12 B.T.A. 1376 ; 1928 BTA LEXIS 3344 ; July 17, 1928 , Promulgated *3344 March 1, 1913, value of stock determined. J. W. Marsh pro se. F. R. Shearer, Esq., for the respondent.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bowles v. Commissioner

    1 B.T.A. 584 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Feb 12, 1925

    Bowles v. Commissioner Docket No. 245. United States Board of Tax Appeals 1 B.T.A. 584 ; 1925 BTA LEXIS 2872 ; February 12, 1925 , decided Submitted January 29, 1925 . *2872 J. D.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Dolenz v. Commissioner

    41 B.T.A. 1091 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · May 8, 1940

    Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. Ingersoll, 153 Cal. 1 ; 94 Pac. 94 ; Smith v. Smith, 47 Cal. App. 650 ; 191 Pac. 60 . … Reviewed by the Board. Decision will he entered wider Rule 60.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Crellin v. Commissioner

    46 B.T.A. 1152 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · May 13, 1942

    Crellin v. Commissioner Docket Nos. 106839, 109669. United States Board of Tax Appeals 46 B.T.A. 1152 ; 1942 BTA LEXIS 768 ; May 13, 1942 , Promulgated *768 1. … Richardson v. Commissioner, 126 Fed.(2d) 562 .

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Rosseter v. Commissioner

    12 B.T.A. 254 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · May 31, 1928

    Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered for the petitioner. Murdock, dissenting: The so-called “ gift ” received by Rosseter was, in the final analysis, compensation received for services. … Eisner v. Macomber, 252 U. S. 189 ; Bowers v. Kerbaugh Empire Co., 271 U. S. 170 ; Noel v. Parrott, 15 Fed. (2d) 669; and Cora B. Beatty, Executrix, 7 B. T. A. 726. SteRNI-iagen and Siefkin agree with this dissent.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Warren Co. v. Commissioner

    46 B.T.A. 897 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 8, 1942

    American National Co. v. United States, 274 U. S. 99; Bonded Mortgage Co. v. Commissioner, 70 Fed. (2d) 341. … Reviewed by the Board. Decisions will he entered wider Rule 50. SEC. 26. CREDITS OF CORPORATIONS.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • St. Louis Tin & Sheet Metal Working Co. v. Commissioner

    12 B.T.A. 723 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jun 21, 1928

    LOUIS TIN & SHEET METAL WORKING CO., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. St. Louis Tin & Sheet Metal Working Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 11976. … United States Board of Tax Appeals 12 B.T.A. 723 ; 1928 BTA LEXIS 3463 ; June 21, 1928 , Promulgated *3463 Evidence held insufficient to overthrow respondent's determination. L. D. Slattery, Esq., for the petitioner.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Pacheco Creek Orchard Co. v. Commissioner

    12 B.T.A. 1358 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jul 16, 1928

    PACHECO CREEK ORCHARD CO., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Pacheco Creek Orchard Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 13465. … United States Board of Tax Appeals 12 B.T.A. 1358 ; 1928 BTA LEXIS 3355 ; July 16, 1928 , Promulgated *3355 1.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Blease v. Commissioner

    16 B.T.A. 972 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jun 10, 1929

    Martin v. Wright, 13 Wend. 463 ; McRae v. McRae, 3 Bradf. Sur. 204 ; Patterson v. Patterson, 13 Johns. 379 ; Quackenbush v. Ehle, 5 Barb. 472 ; Robinson v. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered for the respondent.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Rogers Recreation Co. of Connecticut v. Commissioner

    37 B.T.A. 545 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Mar 29, 1938

    Wishon-Watson Co. v. Commissioner, 66 Fed. (2d) 52; Rubay Co., 9 B. T. A. 133; John M. Burdine Realty Co., 20 B. T. A. 54; Sydney M. Shoen berg, 30 B. T. A. 659; affd., 77 Fed. (2d) 446; certiorari denied, 296 U. … Reviewed by the Board. Decision will be entered for the respondent.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Deutsch v. Commissioner

    2 B.T.A. 729 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 30, 1925

    Deutsch v. Commissioner Docket No. 3005. United States Board of Tax Appeals 2 B.T.A. 729 ; 1925 BTA LEXIS 2298 ; September 30, 1925 , Decided Submitted July 6, 1925 . *2298 Ellis W.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bell v. Commissioner

    46 B.T.A. 484 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Feb 27, 1942

    Irwin v. Gavit, 268 U. S. 161 . … Hale v. Helvering (App. D. C.), 85 Fed. (2d) 819. Reviewed by the Board. Decision toill he entered wider Bule 50. SEC. 24. ITEMS NOT deductible.

    Reversed on other grounds by Bell's Estate v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 137 F.2d 454 (1943)Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Curtis v. Commissioner

    39 B.T.A. 366 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Feb 9, 1939

    Metcalf & Eddy v. Mitchell, supra; Willcuts v. Bunn, 282 U. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgments will be entered under Rule 50.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Charlton & Co. v. Commissioner

    6 B.T.A. 946 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 21, 1927

    CHARLTON & COMPANY, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Charlton & Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 7848. … United States Board of Tax Appeals 6 B.T.A. 946 ; 1927 BTA LEXIS 3371 ; April 21, 1927 , Promulgated *3371 William J. Smith, Esq., for the petitioner. Joseph K. Moyer, Esq., for the respondent.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Briggs Hotel Co. v. Commissioner

    1 B.T.A. 649 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Feb 28, 1925

    Briggs Hotel Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 1068. United States Board of Tax Appeals 1 B.T.A. 649 ; 1925 BTA LEXIS 2825 ; February 28, 1925 , decided Submitted February 16, 1925 . *2825 John G.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Georgia Grocery Co. v. Commissioner

    5 B.T.A. 190 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 26, 1926

    GEORGIA GROCERY CO., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Georgia Grocery Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 5828. … United States Board of Tax Appeals 5 B.T.A. 190 ; 1926 BTA LEXIS 2940 ; October 26, 1926 , Decided *2940 L. R. Christie for the petitioner. Henry Ravenel, Esq., for the respondent.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.