Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersbta

10,000+ results

5.33s

  • Best v. Commissioner

    26 B.T.A. 1070 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 30, 1932

    BEST, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Best v. Commissioner Docket No. 36746. … United States Board of Tax Appeals 26 B.T.A. 1070 ; 1932 BTA LEXIS 1195 ; September 30, 1932 , Promulgated *1195 W. M. Whitney, Esq., for the petitioner. T. M. Mather, Esq., for the respondent.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Phipps v. Commissioner

    43 B.T.A. 790 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Feb 28, 1941

    In Guggenheim v. … Guggenheim v. Rasquin, supra; United States v. Ryerson, supra.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Day v. Commissioner

    1 B.T.A. 15 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 16, 1924

    Day v. Commissioner Docket No. 17. … United States Board of Tax Appeals 1 B.T.A. 15 ; 1924 BTA LEXIS 278 ; October 16, 1924 , decided Submitted October 13, 1924 . *278 Appeal, being from claim for refund of tax paid before June 2, 1924, dismissed for lack of

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Eggink v. Commissioner

    7 B.T.A. 152 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · May 28, 1927

    HENRY EGGINK, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Eggink v. Commissioner Docket No. 6413. … United States Board of Tax Appeals 7 B.T.A. 152 ; 1927 BTA LEXIS 3240 ; May 28, 1927 , Promulgated *3240 March 1, 1913, value of a one-half interest in certain real estate acquired in 1909, and the purchase price of the other

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Star Sporting Goods Co. v. Commissioner

    1 B.T.A. 1266 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · May 27, 1925

    Star Sporting Goods Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 1832. United States Board of Tax Appeals 1 B.T.A. 1266 ; 1925 BTA LEXIS 2593 ; May 27, 1925 , decided Submitted April 21, 1925 . *2593 W.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Commissioner

    6 B.T.A. 1333 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · May 13, 1927

    COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 9387. … Upon the facts the Board is of the opinion that the Commissioner correctly denied the deduction for each of the years involved of one-tenth of the cost of the contract.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Bloomfield v. Commissioner

    6 B.T.A. 298 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Feb 24, 1927

    FREDERICK BLOOMFIELD, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Bloomfield v. Commissioner Docket No. 6501. … United States Board of Tax Appeals 6 B.T.A. 298 ; 1927 BTA LEXIS 3550 ; February 24, 1927 , Promulgated *3550 Theodore B. Benson, Esq., for the petitioner. L. C. Mitchell, Esq., for the respondent.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Calumet Steel Co. v. Commissioner

    9 B.T.A. 174 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 18, 1927

    Calumet Steel Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 6673. … The respondent's action in reducing invested capital by the amount of the bad debt is approved Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered for the Commissioner.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Curry v. Commissioner

    17 B.T.A. 282 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 17, 1929

    His argument is predicated on Marr v. United States, 268 U. … Miles v. Safe Deposit Co., 259 U. S. 247 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Sutcliffe Co. v. Commissioner

    41 B.T.A. 1009 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · May 1, 1940

    Schlemmer v. United States, 94 Fed. (2d) 77; Chapman et al. v. Critchet, 95 S. W. (2d) 360 ; Weger v. Robinson Nash Motor Co., 340 Ill. 81 ; 172 N. E. 7. The evidence is to the contrary. … Reviewed by the Board. Decision will be entered under Ride 50.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ortiz v. Commissioner

    42 B.T.A. 173 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jun 21, 1940

    Miller v. Commissioner, 102 Fed. (2d) 476. … A 223; modified and affirmed, 104 *186 Fed. (2d) 649; Eugene Higgins, supra; Foss v. Commissioner, 75 Fed. (2d) 326; Winmill v. Commissioner, supra; Miller v. Commissioner, supra; Kales v.

    Reversed by Helvering v. Wilmington Trust Co., 124 F.2d 156 (1941)Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Miller v. Commissioner

    29 B.T.A. 1061 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Feb 13, 1934

    Cortland Specialty Co. v. Commissioner, 60 Fed. (2d) 937. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment in Docket No. 60689 will be entered for the respondent. Judgment in Docket No. 60690 will be under Rule 50.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • SAEGER v. COMMISSIONER

    9 B.T.A. 890 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Dec 27, 1927

    In Eisner v. Macomber, 252 U. … Eeviewed by the Board. Judgment will Toe entered for the petitioner on 10 days’ notice, under Bule 50.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Dickinson v. Commissioner

    18 B.T.A. 790 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 14, 1930

    DICKINSON, PETITIONERS, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Dickinson v. Commissioner Docket No. 29208. … United States Board of Tax Appeals 18 B.T.A. 790 ; 1930 BTA LEXIS 2587 ; January 14, 1930 , Promulgated *2587 In 1919 the decedent sold a cotton plantation and transferred title by deed to the purchaser.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Chalmers Liquor Co. v. Commissioner

    1 B.T.A. 49 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 8, 1924

    Chalmers Liquor Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 148. … The matter was presented on the pleadings and oral stipulations of counsel, from which the Board makes the following *50 FINDINGS OF FACT.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Kremer v. Commissioner

    31 B.T.A. 566 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 12, 1934

    Metcalf & Eddy v. Mitchell, 269 U. S. 514 ; Burnet v. Livezey, 48 Fed. (2d) 159. … Reviewed by the Board. Decision will be entered for the respondent.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Cleveland Trust Co. v. Commissioner

    39 B.T.A. 429 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Feb 14, 1939

    Regulations have been promulgated by the respondent, and much has been said by the courts and the Board about the pertinent meaning and application of the term. … See also Helvering v. Coleman-Gilbert Associates, 296 U. S. 369 ; Helvering v. Combs, 296 U. S. 365 ; and Swanson v. Commissioner, 296 U. S. 362 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Stacy v. Commissioner

    43 B.T.A. 91 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Dec 13, 1940

    The petitioner’s dual position as an individual and as a guardian must be kept clear, Van Wart v. Commissioner, 295 U. S. 112 . … It is still true, as the Board said in the earlier proceeding covering; 1931 and 1932, that the Commissioner’s concept of the petitioner’s-relation to the income and expenses of her wards is incorrect.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Jenks v. Commissioner

    3 B.T.A. 596 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Feb 4, 1926

    Jenks v. Commissioner Docket No. 3392. United States Board of Tax Appeals 3 B.T.A. 596 ; 1926 BTA LEXIS 2618 ; February 4, 1926 , Decided Submitted November 11, 1925 . *2618 Isaac C. Jenks pro se. George G.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Independent Life Ins. Co. v. Commissioner

    17 B.T.A. 757 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 4, 1929

    Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered under Rule 50. … , and that the Board is without power to approach such a question.

    Cited 21 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.