Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersbta

10,000+ results

1.96s

  • Christensen Machine Co. v. Commissioner

    18 B.T.A. 256 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 19, 1929

    CHRISTENSEN MACHINE CO., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Christensen Machine Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 23168. … United States Board of Tax Appeals 18 B.T.A. 256 ; 1929 BTA LEXIS 2086 ; November 19, 1929 , Promulgated *2086 1. Cost of a contract and an exhaustion allowance based thereon determined. 2. Ira L.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Fidelity-Bankers Trust Co. v. Commissioner

    37 B.T.A. 142 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 21, 1938

    Swanson v. Commissioner, 296 U. S. 362 . … Keviewed by the Board. Decision will be entered under Rule 50.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Foster v. Commissioner

    2 B.T.A. 180 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jun 26, 1925

    Foster v. Commissioner Docket No. 3063. United States Board of Tax Appeals 2 B.T.A. 180 ; 1925 BTA LEXIS 2509 ; June 26, 1925 , Decided Submitted May 21, 1925 . *2509 Richard R. Martin, Esq., for the taxpayer.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Green v. Commissioner

    8 B.T.A. 730 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 10, 1927

    In Widdall v. Garsed, 17 Atlantic 418, it was said: The “ transfer of the business ” is an uncertain, equivocal expression, and may mean property, or it may mean good will. … We are of the opinion, however, that had good will existed at the time the petitioner acquired the Parkway it could not possibly have been transferred to the Grant under the circumstances of this case because as this Board

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Stafford v. Commissioner

    14 B.T.A. 1199 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 11, 1929

    In United States v. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered for the petitioner.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • William H. Jackson Co. v. Commissioner

    2 B.T.A. 411 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 7, 1925

    Jackson Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 2662. … On reference to the Board, ARUNDELL took no part in the consideration.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Inspiration Consol. Copper Co. v. Commissioner

    11 B.T.A. 1425 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · May 16, 1928

    United States Board of Tax Appeals 11 B.T.A. 1425 ; 1928 BTA LEXIS 3626 ; May 16, 1928 , Promulgated *3626 1. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered on 15 days' notice, under Rule 50.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • McColgan v. Commissioner

    10 B.T.A. 958 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Feb 23, 1928

    MCCOLGAN, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. McColgan v. Commissioner Docket No. 3147. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered on 15 days' notice, under Rule 50.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Schinebro, Inc. v. Commissioner

    45 B.T.A. 580 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 5, 1941

    SCHINEBRO, INCORPORATED, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Schinebro, Inc. v. Commissioner Docket No. 101545. … Reviewed by the Board. Decision will be entered for the respondent.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Atlantic Coast Line R.R. v. Commissioner

    2 B.T.A. 892 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 16, 1925

    Atlantic Coast Line R.R. v. Commissioner Docket No. 2505. … The first issue has been determined by the Board in the . That decision is fully controlling in this case and decisive of this issue. The second point presents a new and distinct issue to the Board.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Newberry v. Commissioner

    39 B.T.A. 1123 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · May 26, 1939

    Doric Apartment Co. v. Commissioner, 94 Fed. (2d) 985; United States v. New River Collieries, 262 U. S. 341 ; Ithaca Trust Co. v. United States, 279 U. S. 151 ; Andrews v. Commissioner, 38 Fed. (2d) 55; Grant Co. v. … Crowell v. Commissioner, supra; Tracy v. Commissioner, supra.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Oppenheimer v. Commissioner

    16 B.T.A. 993 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jun 11, 1929

    LEO OPPENHEIMER, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Oppenheimer v. Commissioner Docket No. 18816. … This Board has had occasion to pass upon this question in numerous appeals.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Roe Stephens Manufacturing Co. v. Commissioner

    12 B.T.A. 1254 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jul 10, 1928

    The Supreme Court of the United States in Burk-Waggoner Oil Association v. Hopkins, 269 U. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered under Buie 50.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Woods Lumber Co. v. Commissioner

    44 B.T.A. 88 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 8, 1941

    Burnet v. Clark, 287 U. S. 410 ; Dalton v. Bowers, 287 U. S. 404 ; and Burnet v. Commonwealth Improvement Co., 287 U. S. 415 . … See New Colonial Ice Co. v. Helvering, 292 U. S. 435 ; Southern Pacific Co. v. Lowe, 247 U. S. 330 ; Gulf Oil Corporation v. Lewellyn, 248 U. S. 71 ; North Jersey Title Insurance Co. v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Chicago & N. W. R. Co. v. Commissioner

    39 B.T.A. 661 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Mar 30, 1939

    MEGAN, TRUSTEE OF THE PROPERTY OF THE CHICAGO AND NORTH WESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Chicago & N. W. R. Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 61703. … United States Board of Tax Appeals 39 B.T.A. 661 ; 1939 BTA LEXIS 996 ; March 30, 1939 , Promulgated *996 1.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Roe Stephens Mfg. Co. v. Commissioner

    12 B.T.A. 1254 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jul 10, 1928

    The Supreme Court of the United States in Burk-Waggoner Oil Association v. Hopkins, 269 U. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered under Buie 50.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hind v. Commissioner

    26 B.T.A. 431 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jun 15, 1932

    HIND, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS A FORMER MEMBER OF, AND ON BEHALF OF THE PARTNERSHIP OF HIND, ROLPH & COMPANY, NOW DISSOLVED, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Hind v. Commissioner Docket No. 19167. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered for the respondent.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Newman v. Commissioner

    15 B.T.A. 369 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Feb 12, 1929

    FAY CARR, EXECUTORS UNDER THE WILL OF LOUIS NEWMAN, PETITIONERS, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. LILLIAN D. NEWMAN, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Newman v. … V.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Fifth Ave. Bank v. Commissioner

    32 B.T.A. 208 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Mar 7, 1935

    SHEPHERD, DECEASED, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Fifth Ave. Bank v. Commissioner Docket No. 69166. … Vanderbilt, the settlor, was alive November 6, 1931, and was still alive at the hearing of this matter before a division of the Board.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Farmers Coop. Ass'n v. Commissioner

    7 B.T.A. 657 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jul 13, 1927

    FARMERS CO-OPERATIVE ASSOCIATION, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Farmers Coop. Ass'n v. Commissioner Docket No. 654. … United States Board of Tax Appeals 7 B.T.A. 657 ; 1927 BTA LEXIS 3136 ; July 13, 1927 , Promulgated *3136 Net income determined from the evidence. Isidor Zeigler, Esq., M. J. Holland, Esq., and F. W.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.