Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersbta

10,000+ results

0.88s

  • Rosenberg v. Commissioner

    32 B.T.A. 618 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · May 17, 1935

    On January 25, 1935, the Clerk of the Board received through the mail and filed as No. 78410, a petition captioned “ I. J. Rosenberg, Transferee, Bankers Security Co., Transferor, Petitioner, v. … Reviewed by the Board.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • New York Trust Co. v. Commissioner

    20 B.T.A. 162 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jun 26, 1930

    Since the Board is a body of limited jurisdiction, all requirements of the statute giving it jurisdiction must be strktly complied with. See Monks v. Duffle, 259 S. W. 735 , and Keal v. Rhydderck, 148 N. … Reviewed by the Board.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • American Laundry Machinery Co. v. Commissioner

    32 B.T.A. 793 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jun 17, 1935

    THE AMERICAN LAUNDRY MACHINERY COMPANY, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. American Laundry Machinery Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 75721. … Brown Co., 8 B.T.A. 112 ; Crown Willamette Paper Co., 14 B.T.A. 133 ; Arcade Department Store, Inc., 18 B.T.A. 1172 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • The Evergreens v. Commissioner

    47 B.T.A. 815 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 7, 1942

    Tait v. Western Maryland Ry. Co., 289 U. S. 620 . … Reviewed by the Board. Decision will be entered, wider Bule 50. Elmhurst Cemetery Co. of Joliet v. Commissioner, 300 U. S. 37 .

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Rieck v. Commissioner

    35 B.T.A. 1178 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · May 28, 1937

    It has been held that the question of what constitutes a “petition” is one for the Board to determine. Continental Petroleum Co. v. United States, (Dist. Ct., W. D. … Bonwit Teller & Co. v. United States, 283 U. S. 258 , 51 S. Ct. 395 , 75 L. Ed. 1018 . Reviewed by the Board.

    Reversed by Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Rieck, 104 F.2d 294 (1939)Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Coley v. Commissioner

    45 B.T.A. 405 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 22, 1941

    COLEY, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Coley v. Commissioner Docket No. 99322. … Cohen Trust v. Commissioner, 121 Fed.(2d) 689 , followed. John E. McClure, Esq., for the petitioner. L. W. Creason, Esq., for the respondent.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Pitcher v. Commissioner

    31 B.T.A. 957 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Dec 28, 1934

    Register v. Commissioner, 69 Fed. (2d) 607; Kreipke v. Commissioner, 32 Fed. (2d) 694, affirming 7 B. T. A. 777; Burnet v. Livezey, 48 Fed. (2d) 159; Harry D. Kremer, 31 B. T. A. 566. … Such facts were present in Burnet v. Livezey, supra, and United States v. Butler, 49 Fed. (2d) 52, cases in which the compensation was Held to be exempt *961 from tax.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Nicholson v. Commissioner

    32 B.T.A. 977 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jul 19, 1935

    In Helvering v. Gregory, 69 Fed. (2d) 809; affirmed in Gregory v. Helvering, 293 U. … A. 1014; affirmed in Commissioner v. Kerbaugh, supra, the Board stated: * * * A charge of fraud has always been regarded as a serious matter in the law.

    Cited 77 timesPublished
  • Retailers Credit Asso. v. Commissioner

    33 B.T.A. 1166 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Feb 25, 1936

    In connection with the third condition, it is obvious petitioner was neither a chamber of commerce, real estate board, or board of trade. … Trinidad v. Sagrada Orden 263 U. S. 578, 581 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Providence Mill Supply Co. v. Commissioner

    2 B.T.A. 791 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 5, 1925

    Providence Mill Supply Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 3261. United States Board of Tax Appeals 2 B.T.A. 791 ; 1925 BTA LEXIS 2264 ; October 5, 1925 , Decided Submitted July 3, 1925 . *2264 1. … Other corporations in the same line of business as the Providence Co. are Brown Brothers Co., the Hope Mill Supply Co., and the United States Oil & Supply Co., all of providence, R.I. DECISION.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Wood v. Commissioner

    31 B.T.A. 1141 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 29, 1935

    [Citing cases.] * * * In Helvering v. … On its material facts this case is not distinguishable from Blair v. Mathews, 29 Fed. (2d) 892, and United States v. Butler, 49 Fed. (2d) 52. We sustain the contentions of the petitioner. Reviewed by the Board.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Denholm & McKay Co. v. Commissioner

    41 B.T.A. 986 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 30, 1940

    A. 56, and notwithstanding the reversal of the Board’s decision in the Rieck case in Commissioner v. … Reviewed by the Board. Decision will he entered under Bule 50.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Missouri P. R. Co. v. Commissioner

    30 B.T.A. 587 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · May 1, 1934

    Bray, 225 U.S. 205, 217 , as quoted with approval by the same Court in New York v. … Reviewed by the Board.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Nash-Breyer Motor Co. v. Commissioner

    20 B.T.A. 577 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Aug 21, 1930

    In Draper v. Davis, 102 U. … In Simpson v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Anderson v. Commissioner

    31 B.T.A. 197 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 26, 1934

    Again quoting from Noel v. … Garey, and Noel v. Parrott, supra, the board of directors, as such, voted this payment to the petitioner.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Shanley v. Commissioner

    7 B.T.A. 521 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jun 24, 1927

    The question presented is governed by the opinions of the Board in Appeal of New York Trust Co. et al., Executors, 3 B. T. A. 583, and E. L. Harris v. Commissioner, 5 B. T. A. 1026. … Harris v. Commissioner, supra, presented facts which are the converse of those presented in the instant case.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co. v. Commissioner

    36 B.T.A. 1122 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Dec 9, 1937

    THE CINCINNATI GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY, PETITIONER, ET AL., 1 v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co. v. Commissioner Docket Nos. 44351, 44352, 44353, 46903, 49614, 50424. … Brown, C.P.A., for the petitioners. Philip M. Clark, Esq., and Stanley B. Pierson, Esq., for the respondent. HILL *1122 OPINION.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Coosa Land Co. v. Commissioner

    29 B.T.A. 389 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 23, 1933

    McMillan Metal Co., 2 B.T.A. 797 ; General Water Heater Co., 14 B.T.A. 4 ; Atlas Plaster & Fuel Co., 18 B.T.A. 1123; Brown & Haley, 21 B.T.A. 752 ; Barto Co., 21 B.T.A. 1197 ; Gray & Co. v. … Roberts, 19 B.T.A. 351 ; Dawkins Lumber Co. v. Row, 276 S.W. 493 ; Duncan v. Gage, 250 S.W. 647 ; Boggs & Buhl v. Commissioner , 34 Fed. (2d) 859. Decision will be entered u/nder Rule 50. Sec. 284.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Appeal of the Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance

    1 B.T.A. 767 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Mar 16, 1925

    The relief which he was denied in court he in effect was given through an appeal to the Board. … San Mateo County v. Southern Pacific R. R. Co., 116 U. S. 138 ; Little v. Bowers 134 U. S. 547 ; Mills v. Green, 159 U. S. 651 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Jaffee v. Commissioner

    17 B.T.A. 675 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 28, 1929

    That similar principles would apply to the board of directors of a New York corporation when in voluntary dissolution is shown by the following statement from Security Trust Co. v. Pritchard, 201 App. Div. 142 ; 194 N. … Also Liberty Baking Co. v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.