Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersbta

10,000+ results

4.66s

  • Howell v. Commissioner

    1 B.T.A. 1224 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · May 23, 1925

    Howell v. Commissioner Docket No. 1287, 1288. United States Board of Tax Appeals 1 B.T.A. 1224 ; 1925 BTA LEXIS 2621 ; May 23, 1925 , decided Submitted April 6, 1925 . *2621 R. F. Delahant, C.P.A., for the taxpayers. … The issues presented for consideration of the Board are the same for each taxpayer, and the two appeals were heard together.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Keen v. Commissioner

    15 B.T.A. 1243 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 3, 1929

    HERBERT IDE KEEN, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Keen v. Commissioner Docket No. 22262. … The case of this same petitioner was before the Board for the year 1921 in Herbert Ide Keen, 6 B.T.A. 275 .

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Barker v. Commissioner

    13 B.T.A. 562 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 26, 1928

    Miller v. Gearin (C. C. A.), 258 Fed. 225 ; Cryan v. Wardell, 263 Fed. 248 . The amounts paid as security were not held in escrow, or as a trust fund. … Reviewed by the Board. Decision will be entered v/nder Rude 50.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Knapp v. Commissioner

    7 B.T.A. 790 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jul 29, 1927

    KNAPP, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Knapp v. Commissioner Docket No. 2775. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered on 15 days' notice, under Rule 50. ARUNDELL concurs in the result. Footnotes 1. No returns filed. ↩

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Walls v. Commissioner

    21 B.T.A. 1417 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 30, 1931

    WALLS, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Walls v. Commissioner Docket No. 25297. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered under Rule 50.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Sacks v. Commissioner

    25 B.T.A. 415 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 29, 1932

    SACKS, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Sacks v. Commissioner Docket No. 39851. … Chapin and Sacks Manufacturing Company was succeeded by Chapin-Sacks Corporation in 1920 and petitioner became vice president and chairman of the board of the company in charge of its finances.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Spang-Chalfant & Co. v. Commissioner

    9 B.T.A. 858 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Dec 23, 1927

    SPANG-CHALFANT & CO., INC., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Spang-Chalfant & Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 10469. … United States Board of Tax Appeals 9 B.T.A. 858 ; 1927 BTA LEXIS 2506 ; December 23, 1927 , Promulgated *2506 1.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Davis Co. v. Commissioner

    6 B.T.A. 281 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Feb 21, 1927

    THE DAVIS COMPANY, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Davis Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 5497. … The chamber of commerce or board of trade requested that the petitioner make the new enterprise possible by selling its property to the foundry company.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Saner-Ragley Lumber Co. v. Commissioner

    3 B.T.A. 927 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Feb 19, 1926

    The Board has had occasion to pass directly upon the principle here involved in Appeal of Tel-Electric Co., 1 B. T. A. 434, and Appeal of North Wayne Tool Co., 2 B. T. … In the recent decision of the Supreme Court in United States v. Anderson, 269 U.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Peoples Nat'l Bank v. Commissioner

    39 B.T.A. 565 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Mar 7, 1939

    ROBERTS, EXECUTOR OF MARTHA ROBERTS FARISH, PETITIONERS, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Peoples Nat'l Bank v. Commissioner Docket No. 89594. … The respondent's determination is in accord with the decisions of the Board and of the courts in ; affd., ; certiorari denied, ; , affirming ; ; ; , and other cases of like import.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Magnolia Farmers Elevator Co. v. Commissioner

    19 B.T.A. 390 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Mar 25, 1930

    MAGNOLIA FARMERS ELEVATOR CO., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Magnolia Farmers Elevator Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 6853. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered for the respondent.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Randall Bros., Inc. v. Commissioner

    4 B.T.A. 291 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jul 20, 1926

    Randall Bros., Inc. v. Commissioner Docket No. 1770. … There is much merit in the suggestion, which was fully considered by the Board at the time of its decision in the .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Thibaut & Walker Co. v. Commissioner

    42 B.T.A. 29 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jun 11, 1940

    The facts are presented by a stipulation which the Board adopts as its findings of fact. The petitioner is a corporation, organized under the laws of New York. … Helvering v. Stockholms Enskilda Bank, 293 U. S. 84 . The petitioner is not entitled to the credit. Decision will be entered for the resfondent.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Sidney-Hill System of Health Bldg. Co. v. Commissioner

    12 B.T.A. 548 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jun 13, 1928

    SIDNEY-HILL SYSTEM OF HEALTH BUILDING CO., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Sidney-Hill System of Health Bldg. Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 13963. … United States Board of Tax Appeals 12 B.T.A. 548 ; 1928 BTA LEXIS 3502 ; June 13, 1928 , Promulgated *3502 A judgment for damages for loss of property which became binding on the taxpayer in one year and was paid the following

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Albers v. Commissioner

    33 B.T.A. 373 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 6, 1935

    ALBERS, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Albers v. Commissioner Docket No. 74759. … Helvering v. Bliss, 293 U.S. 144 . 2.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Van Vranken v. Commissioner

    40 B.T.A. 956 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 24, 1939

    ELSIE VAN VRANKEN, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Van Vranken v. Commissioner Docket No. 92788. … United States Board of Tax Appeals 40 B.T.A. 956 ; 1939 BTA LEXIS 777 ; November 24, 1939 , Promulgated *777 Petitioner's father left certain personal property to his wife for life, then to petitioner if she should outlive

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • New York, C. & S. L. R. Co. v. Commissioner

    26 B.T.A. 1229 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 20, 1932

    Co. v. Commis sioner, 284 U. S. 552 . … Co. v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Pennsylvania Water & Power Co. v. Commissioner

    36 B.T.A. 467 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Aug 24, 1937

    This contention is sound and accords with the view frequently expressed by the courts and this Board. Western Maryland Railway Co. v. Commissioner, 33 Fed. (2d) 695; New York Central Railroad Co. v. … The question was recently considered by this Board in Metropolitan Edison Co., supra (issue III).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hoskins v. Commissioner

    42 B.T.A. 117 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jun 18, 1940

    This definition has been considered and accepted by the Board as a fair interpretation of the statute and as having the force and effect of law. Olive Ross, 37 B. T. A. 928, 931; Alfred E. Fuhlage, 32 B. T. … A. 222; petition to review dismissed, Helvering v. Fuhlage, 79 Fed. (2d) 998; Percy Wade, 40 B. T. A. 328.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Walville Lumber Co. v. Commissioner

    12 B.T.A. 152 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · May 28, 1928

    WALVILLE LUMBER CO., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Walville Lumber Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 10295. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered for the respondent.

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.