Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersbta

10,000+ results

1.39s

  • O'Neil v. Commissioner

    31 B.T.A. 727 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 23, 1934

    O'NEIL, DECEASED, PETITIONERS, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. O'Neil v. Commissioner Docket No. 71706. … Hoyt v. Chapin, 85 Minn. 524 ; 89 N.W. 850 .

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Colony Coal & Coke Corp. v. Commissioner

    20 B.T.A. 326 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jul 25, 1930

    COLONY COAL & COKE CORPORATION, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. HAZARD COAL CORPORATION, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Colony Coal & Coke Corp. v. … MAPOTHER, 1st V-Pres L & N RR Co., Louisville, Ky.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Spencer v. Commissioner

    11 B.T.A. 437 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 9, 1928

    MARION PARSONS SPENCER, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Spencer v. Commissioner Docket No. 22194. … Brown, Esq., for the respondent.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Alexander Sprunt & Son, Inc. v. Commissioner

    24 B.T.A. 599 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 4, 1931

    Altschul Tobacco Co. v. Commissioner, 42 Fed. (2d) 609. … American Rolling Mills Co. v. Commissioner, 41 Fed. (2d) 314.

    Modified by Alexander Sprunt & Son v. Commissioner of Int. Rev., 64 F.2d 424 (1933)Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Warren County Fertilizer Co. v. Commissioner

    17 B.T.A. 113 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Aug 16, 1929

    WARREN COUNTY FERTILIZER CO., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Warren County Fertilizer Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 15999. … Brown 1 Eugene English 1 T. T. Miller 1 A. E. Kitchens 5 S. E. DuPuis 1 T. A. English 5 Besse Cason Battle 36 Denam Cason 5 C. R. Fitzpatrick 30 H. C. Brown 1 A. Baker 5 E. R. English 10 R. S. Mathews 5 B. T.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Osborn v. Commissioner

    22 B.T.A. 935 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Mar 30, 1931

    Word v. Thompson, 22 How. 330, 334 ; 16 L. Ed. 249 ; Meehan v. Valentine, 145 U. S. 611 ; 12 Sup. Ct. 972; 36 L. Ed. 835 ; Keismetter v. … Reviewed by the Board. Decision will be entered under Rule 50.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Leydig v. Commissioner

    15 B.T.A. 124 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 29, 1929

    The majority view seems to be in accord with Kansas National Gas Co. v. Boards 75 Kans. 335 ; 89 Pac. 750 , in holding such rights amount to title. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will he entered wider Buie 50.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • C. H. Swift & Sons, Inc. v. Commissioner

    13 B.T.A. 138 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jul 31, 1928

    SWIFT & SONS, INC., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. C. H. Swift & Sons, Inc. v. Commissioner Docket No. 4806. … Log-run brown ash, 13,000 ft. 4/4.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Killian Co. v. Commissioner

    20 B.T.A. 80 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jun 16, 1930

    KILLIAN CO., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Killian Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 37377. … United States Board of Tax Appeals 20 B.T.A. 80 ; 1930 BTA LEXIS 2203 ; June 16, 1930 , Promulgated *2203 1.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Thompson & Black v. Commissioner

    11 B.T.A. 729 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 20, 1928

    THOMPSON & BLACK, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Thompson & Black v. Commissioner Docket No. 10837. … Brown, Esq., for the respondent. ARUNDELL *729 This proceeding is for the redetermination of a deficiency of $5,212.40 in excess-profits taxes for the year 1917.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Community Water Service Co. v. Commissioner

    32 B.T.A. 164 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Feb 28, 1935

    Old Colony Trust Co. v. Com missioner, 279 U. S. 716 ; Commissioner v. Liberty Bank & Trust Co., 59 Fed. (2d) 320; Sandy Fox v. Commissioner, 75 Fed. (2d) 183. The Board performs judicial functions. Goldsmith v. … Board, 270 U. S. 117 ; Blair v. Oesterlein Machine Co., 275 U. S. 220, 227 ; Uncasville Mfg. Co. v. Commissioner, 55 Fed. (2d) 893, 897; Underwood v. Commissioner, 56 Fed. (2d) 67, 73; Commissioner v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Thomas v. Commissioner

    25 B.T.A. 810 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Mar 7, 1932

    LU FRISK THOMAS, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Thomas v. Commissioner Docket No. 55331. … United States Board of Tax Appeals 25 B.T.A. 810 ; 1932 BTA LEXIS 1471 ; March 7, 1932 , Promulgated *1471 Held, that under the provisions of subdivisions (a) and (c)(5) of section 101 of the Revenue Act of 1928 the petitioner

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • East Toledo Paint Shop Co. v. Commissioner

    2 B.T.A. 1195 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 6, 1925

    East Toledo Paint Shop Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 3441. United States Board of Tax Appeals 2 B.T.A. 1195 ; 1925 BTA LEXIS 2114 ; November 6, 1925 , Decided Submitted July 22, 1925 . *2114 Thomas O. … Coney 1 Florence Snyder 1 Howard Eggleston 3 Cleo Richard Brown 2 *2115 All of the stock, except that held by Wesley L. Thurstin, jr., and H. H. Nelson, was issued for cash.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Pierce Oil Corp. v. Commissioner

    32 B.T.A. 403 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 17, 1935

    The case is controlled in principle by Lucas v. American Code Co., 280 U. S. 445 ; North American Oil Consolidated v. Burnet, 286 U. S. 417 ; Brown v. Helvering, 291 U. S. 193 ; Pharr v. Commissioner, 56 Fed. (2d) 832. … Brown v. Helvering, supra.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Weber-King Lumber Co. v. Commissioner

    20 B.T.A. 1011 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 26, 1930

    WEBER-KING LUMBER CO., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Weber-King Lumber Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 22574. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered under Rule 50.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Garden City Feeder Co. v. Commissioner

    27 B.T.A. 1132 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 10, 1933

    Board of Tax Appeals, 270 U. S. 117 ; Phillips v. Commissioner, 283 U. S. 589 . … United States ex rel James McCandless v. Board, 26 Fed. (2d) 1003.

    Reversed on other grounds by Garden City Feeder Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Rev., 75 F.2d 804 (1935)Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Sanborn v. Commissioner

    39 B.T.A. 721 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 7, 1939

    Hulburd v. Commissioner, 296 U. S. 300 . In the language of Mr. … Oleen v. Helvering, 88 Fed. (2d) 650. A comparable comment applies with respect to United States v. Continental National Bank Trust Co., 805 U. S. 398 . See Olsen v. Helvering, supra.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • J. S. Rippel & Co. v. Commissioner

    36 B.T.A. 789 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 2, 1937

    The decision of the Board in the case of J. S. Rippel & Co., 30 B. T. A. 1146, appears to be in conflict with the opinion of the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in the case of Lilienthal v. … We think the case of Buttgenbach & Co. v. Commissioner, 63 Fed. (2d) 630, cited by petitioner, is distinguishable on its facts.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • George D. Harter Bank v. Commissioner

    27 B.T.A. 941 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Mar 16, 1933

    See Weiss v. Weiner, 279 U. S. 333 ; Burke-Waggoner Oil Ass’n. v. Hopkins, 269 U. S. 110 ; United States v. Childs, 266 U. S. 304 . … See also Bankers Pocahontas Coal Co. v. Burnet, 287 U. S. 308 , and Strother v. Burnet, 287 U. S. 314 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Pacific Southwest Realty Co. v. Commissioner

    45 B.T.A. 426 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 24, 1941

    Compare Brown-Rogers-Dixson Co. v. Commissioner (C. C. A., 4th Cir.), 122 Fed. (2d) 347. It follows that the respondent committed no error in denying the claimed deductions for interest, discount, and premiums. … Whelan v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.